Gay Adoption

[patrickaa317]

On the flip side, did you know that you can marry a horse in 0 states but can have homosexual intercourse in 50 states+DC?

Untrue. http://www.sodomy.org/laws/ it's a bit out of date, because some of the laws are technically on the books but have been found by the courts to be unconstitutional. However, I know at least Alabama is still on the books and has not been challenged.

The supreme court struck down all sodomy laws in 2003 and declared them unconstitutional. I don't think an exception was granted to alabama. I'll post more details when I am not on my cellular telephone.

[Woodruff]

But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.

It will lead to gay adoption

Is it a problem for children to be raised in loving homes instead of on the street?

I thought poverty and lack of medical care forced kids to sleep on the street. Now not allowing gay marriage causes it?

Learn how to read. Seriously. It's pretty basic.

You bet your ass it does! In fact, you are already directly responsible for all homelessness in America just for asking....

Were you going to answer my question, Phatscotty? Or is this just another example we should add to the long list of things you ignore because you don't have an answer for them?

[Woodruff]

Grab a case of Dr Pepper for me and a bottle of vodka for pwn Saxi. Do you want any Canadian Mountain Dew, it doesn't have caffeine and tastes slightly mellower.

Mountain Dew without the caffeine? What's the point?

[2dimes]

Mountain Dew without the caffeine? What's the point?

• It's delicious.
• Won't keep you up.
• Less addictive.
• You can drink it when you're attracted to that Mormon girl and doing your "investigator" thing about her excellent cult.
• You can spike it with roofies and offer it to morman cougars. (this is like a twenty year old or so that has not got married yet)
• In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.

[Phatscotty]

But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.

It will lead to gay adoption

Is it a problem for children to be raised in loving homes instead of on the street?

I thought poverty and lack of medical care forced kids to sleep on the street. Now not allowing gay marriage causes it?

Learn how to read. Seriously. It's pretty basic.

You bet your ass it does! In fact, you are already directly responsible for all homelessness in America just for asking....

Were you going to answer my question, Phatscotty? Or is this just another example we should add to the long list of things you ignore because you don't have an answer for them?

Just because you think you are clever hiding your trolling inside a question does not mean I am dumb enough to get tangled in it. There is only one way to answer your question, which means you have no business asking it because you already know the answer.

As far as I am concerned, you completely changed the subject. That is where the true dodge lies

[Woodruff]

Mountain Dew without the caffeine? What's the point?

• It's delicious.
• Won't keep you up.
• Less addictive.
• You can drink it when you're attracted to that Mormon girl and doing your "investigator" thing about her excellent cult.
• You can spike it with roofies and offer it to morman cougars. (this is like a twenty year old or so that has not got married yet)
• In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.

It seems like drinking alcohol-free beer.

[*]In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.[/list]

I find this fascinating. Why would the color have anything to do with caffiene and health? Sounds like a market ploy by some brown-colored soft drink to me.

[Woodruff]

But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.

It will lead to gay adoption

Is it a problem for children to be raised in loving homes instead of on the street?

I thought poverty and lack of medical care forced kids to sleep on the street. Now not allowing gay marriage causes it?

Learn how to read. Seriously. It's pretty basic.

You bet your ass it does! In fact, you are already directly responsible for all homelessness in America just for asking....

Were you going to answer my question, Phatscotty? Or is this just another example we should add to the long list of things you ignore because you don't have an answer for them?

Just because you think you are clever hiding your trolling inside a question does not mean I am dumb enough to get tangled in it.

Trolling? Are you serious? You think my honest question was trolling? Will you seriously go to any length at all to avoid answering legitimate questions? Was it a leading question? Of course it was...why are you afraid of answering it...are you afraid that answering it will force you out as being just plain old homophobic or something?

There is only one way to answer your question, which means you have no business asking it because you already know the answer.

I'm confused now. Earlier, you seemed to be implying that gay adoption was a bad thing. Now you seem to be implying that gay adoption is a good thing (unless I'm completely misunderstanding your implication here, which happens when you won't answer the damn question).

As far as I am concerned, you completely changed the subject. That is where the true dodge lies

Stop it, troll. Answer the question instead of being so afraid of your own thoughts.

[saxitoxin]

[*]In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.[/list]

I find this fascinating. Why would the color have anything to do with caffiene and health? Sounds like a market ploy by some brown-colored soft drink to me.

The potential existed that some people would assume Mountain Drew, Orange Crush or Big Red was a fruit juice. Forcing them to remove the mildly addictive caffeine levels the playing field and protects that segment of the population who would both assume Mountain Dew was a healthy beverage choice and would be unresponsive to packaging warnings, no matter how large.

[Phatscotty]

Every child deserves a mother and a father.

[2dimes]

In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.

I find this fascinating. Why would the color have anything to do with caffiene and health? Sounds like a market ploy by some brown-colored soft drink to me.

The potential existed that some people would assume Mountain Drew, Orange Crush or Big Red was a fruit juice. Forcing them to remove the mildly addictive caffeine levels the playing field and protects that segment of the population who would both assume Mountain Dew was a healthy beverage choice and would be unresponsive to packaging warnings, no matter how large.

One of you knows how to protect Walmart shoppers/north Americans from themselves.

Also back In the old days people did not want to have to be as conscious feeding their children soda pop. With a glance I could tell, that's red and makes the 5 year old boy hyper so he can't drink it at this time or it's brown I have to go find out if it's rootbeer or something with caffeine in it that I don't want him to have until he's a little older. It's green, orange, clear, purple or yellow. He can drink it if we're not too close to bedtime since I don't want to have to change the sheets for another day or two.

[saxitoxin]

In Canada there used to be some sort of Health law prohibiting caffeine in soft drinks that are not brown in colour. If it's still on the books they are challenging it with code red and the others.

I find this fascinating. Why would the color have anything to do with caffiene and health? Sounds like a market ploy by some brown-colored soft drink to me.

The potential existed that some people would assume Mountain Drew, Orange Crush or Big Red was a fruit juice. Forcing them to remove the mildly addictive caffeine levels the playing field and protects that segment of the population who would both assume Mountain Dew was a healthy beverage choice and would be unresponsive to packaging warnings, no matter how large.

One of you knows how to protect Walmart shoppers/north Americans from themselves.

Also back In the old days people did not want to have to be as conscious feeding their children soda pop. With a glance I could tell, that's red and makes the 5 year old boy hyper so he can't drink it at this time or it's brown I have to go find out if it's rootbeer or something with caffeine in it that I don't want him to have until he's a little older. It's green, orange, clear, purple or yellow. He can drink it if we're not too close to bedtime since I don't want to have to change the sheets for another day or two.

To slightly modify the words of Scott ... "every child deserves a father, a mother, and a U.S. Federal Trade Commission and/or Canadian Competition Bureau."

[2dimes]

Hear him!

So far the government of Canuckistan is keeping all the nasty stuff from Monsanto out of our dairy cows too but we're creeping toward being just like our cool older bro the US&A everyminute.

We used to have strict laws against misleading advertising it was great.

[saxitoxin]

Hear him!

So far the government of Canuckistan is keeping all the nasty stuff from Monsanto out of our dairy cows too but we're creeping toward being just like our cool older bro the US&A everyminute.

Until you start installing 100-story windwills at the border to blow-back seed spores floating in from North Dakota, it's a losing cause.

[Woodruff]

Every child deserves a mother and a father.

Why? What makes "a mother and a father" so special? What makes a mother and a father more important than a loving home?

[saxitoxin]

Every child deserves a mother and a father.

Why? What makes "a mother and a father" so special?

So should robots be allowed to adopt, Woodruff? Well, should they?



What if it wasn't recreation or homecare robots but Death-Droids, or even Model 7000-X Death-Droids? Would that make you happy?

Yeah, you don't have an answer for that, huh?

[2dimes]

Hear him!

So far the government of Canuckistan is keeping all the nasty stuff from Monsanto out of our dairy cows too but we're creeping toward being just like our cool older bro the US&A everyminute.

Until you start installing 100-story windwills at the border to blow-back seed spores floating in from North Dakota, it's a losing cause.

We have had GMO crops for awhile. The dairy production enhancing hormones are not allowed. You can taste the difference in milk too. We bring our own if camping. So far it's not restricted at the boarder. And we try to steer the kids away from the ice cream dessert bar at Golden Corral. Obviously some ofthe dairy cows are probably ending up in the Famous Star hold the cheese at Carl's Jr. But we're not quite organic granola only in our pantry.

[Woodruff]

Every child deserves a mother and a father.

Why? What makes "a mother and a father" so special?

So should robots be allowed to adopt, Woodruff? Well, should they?

What if it wasn't recreation or homecare robots but Death-Droids, or even Model 7000-X Death-Droids? Would that make you happy?

Yeah, you don't have an answer for that, huh?

Sometimes, I suspect that's precisely how Phatscotty views homosexuals.

[saxitoxin]

Hear him!

So far the government of Canuckistan is keeping all the nasty stuff from Monsanto out of our dairy cows too but we're creeping toward being just like our cool older bro the US&A everyminute.

Until you start installing 100-story windwills at the border to blow-back seed spores floating in from North Dakota, it's a losing cause.

We have had GMO crops for awhile. The dairy production enhancing hormones are not allowed. You can taste the difference in milk too. We bring our own if camping. So far it's not restricted at the boarder. And we try to steer the kids away from the ice cream dessert bar at Golden Corral. Obviously some ofthe dairy cows are probably ending up in the Famous Star hold the cheese at Carl's Jr. But we're not quite organic granola only in our pantry.

But don't the cows eat GMO feed grain?

[2dimes]

Not as much as the people.

Most cattle here are free range grass fed. Once they get to the feed lot they'll get fed nasty things I don't like the flavour of those cows. While I was growing up eating cows from my Grandma's Husband's farm I developed a sensitive beef palate.

My wife can eat beef in the UK and can't taste the difference.

[2dimes]

I could tell when Burger King here switched to pink slime. I still ate it but it slowed me down. I love how the dog food around here is now mostly human grade meats. Several times more expensive than before and dogs are living noticeably shorter lives.

[patrickaa317]

But it can't be true, because I heard that allowing gay marriage would lead to beastiality, not the other way around.

It will lead to gay adoption

Is it a problem for children to be raised in loving homes instead of on the street?

I thought poverty and lack of medical care forced kids to sleep on the street. Now not allowing gay marriage causes it?

Learn how to read. Seriously. It's pretty basic.

Your comment implied that if there if gay marriage is allowed, there are less kids on the street. Therefore you are also implying that not allowing gay marriage keeps more kids on the street.

If that's not want you meant, don't criticize my reading skills, you should check your skills at communicating your points.

[2dimes]

Actually he was not implying a bunch of things you want to read into it. He quoted a statement and directly asked a question.

Basically weighing the difference between a kid having no parents versus gay adopted parents.

[2dimes]

And don't worry. If gay people are allowed to adopt they will end up at the very bottom of the list. I'm pretty confident the kid actually was not getting adopted until some people that know what it's like to be rejected by everyone else had the compassion to adopt it.

[patrickaa317]

Actually he was not implying a bunch of things you want to read into it. He quoted a statement and directly asked a question.

Basically weighing the difference between a kid having no parents versus gay adopted parents.

It was a loaded question at that. If he worded it the way you did, then it's a valid question without being loaded and I would personally answer it as:

I'd much rather have children raised with gay adopted parents than on the street. I would also rather have children raised with gay adopted parents than be victims of infanticide. I would also rather have children raised with gay adopted parents than be victims of abortion. I would also rather have children raised with gay adopted parents than be raised in abusive situations.

If you feel his question wasn't loaded, perhaps you will have no issue answering this one. What percent of same-sex couples would provide a loving home?

[patrickaa317]

And don't worry. If gay people are allowed to adopt they will end up at the very bottom of the list. I'm pretty confident the kid actually was not getting adopted until some people that know what it's like to be rejected by everyone else had the compassion to adopt it.

Oh, they aren't allowed now? Did you know that in 2007, 65,000 adopted kids lived in homes with same-sex parents?