Conquer Club

shoulda hadda gun?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

read the god damned title you idiota

 
Total votes : 0

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Night Strike on Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:29 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Or Holmes propped the door open earlier, went to his car, donned the armor and guns, and then re-entered through the exit door.

The police confirmed this.


Maybe the guy is protecting his buddy. This is an interesting story

http://www.wkyc.com/news/article/252995 ... e-theater-
A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

He says he thinks someone deliberately let the gunman inside once the movie started.

Here's what he told TV station KCNC this morning live on their newscast.

Expanded coverage

"As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place."



I'm pretty sure it was the same person: he left the theater after propping the door open in order to come back around and re-enter with his equipment.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:56 pm

Night Strike wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Or Holmes propped the door open earlier, went to his car, donned the armor and guns, and then re-entered through the exit door.

The police confirmed this.


Maybe the guy is protecting his buddy. This is an interesting story

http://www.wkyc.com/news/article/252995 ... e-theater-
A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

He says he thinks someone deliberately let the gunman inside once the movie started.

Here's what he told TV station KCNC this morning live on their newscast.

Expanded coverage

"As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place."



I'm pretty sure it was the same person: he left the theater after propping the door open in order to come back around and re-enter with his equipment.


Yeah, I know. Just sharing.

But separately, I have been anxious to hear some statements from survivors. There is one individual who is a Navy vet I think, and I was listening to his story about how he saved his two friends lives by laying on top of them while he had already been shot twice. He said the first thing he was going to do when he gets out of the hospital is to go back to the same theater and sit in the same seat and watch The Dark Knight Rises.

=D>
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby tkr4lf on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:00 pm

I read that one of the victims had previously survived a mass shooting at a mall in Toronto. That's pretty messed up. You survive one mass shooting, and then later you get killed in another mass shooting. What kind of luck did that lady have?
User avatar
Major tkr4lf
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Night Strike on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:05 pm

Phatscotty wrote:But separately, I have been anxious to hear some statements from survivors. There is one individual who is a Navy vet I think, and I was listening to his story about how he saved his two friends lives by laying on top of them while he had already been shot twice. He said the first thing he was going to do when he gets out of the hospital is to go back to the same theater and sit in the same seat and watch The Dark Knight Rises.


There's a story about how one military man sacrificed his life to protect his girlfriend. Fox News had an interview this afternoon with the woman who lives in the apartment beneath the shooter: she nearly opened his apartment door to turn off the music but at the last moment she decided not to. If she had opened that door, the entire situation would have been much worse (plus it would have been harder to find evidence of this person's background).
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:35 pm

tkr4lf wrote:I read that one of the victims had previously survived a mass shooting at a mall in Toronto. That's pretty messed up. You survive one mass shooting, and then later you get killed in another mass shooting. What kind of luck did that lady have?


Dude needs to start playing the lotto.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby john9blue on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:37 pm

...what?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby tkr4lf on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:38 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I read that one of the victims had previously survived a mass shooting at a mall in Toronto. That's pretty messed up. You survive one mass shooting, and then later you get killed in another mass shooting. What kind of luck did that lady have?


Dude needs to start playing the lotto.

It's a female, and she's dead, so I doubt she's going to start playing the lottery.
User avatar
Major tkr4lf
 
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
Location: St. Louis

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:41 pm

tkr4lf wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I read that one of the victims had previously survived a mass shooting at a mall in Toronto. That's pretty messed up. You survive one mass shooting, and then later you get killed in another mass shooting. What kind of luck did that lady have?


Dude needs to start playing the lotto.

It's a female, and she's dead, so I doubt she's going to start playing the lottery.


oh, missed the part about how she got killed. I thought we were talking about survivors.

:oops:
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:06 pm

Army of GOD wrote:just saw this from someone's Facetbook

Image

THE FACTS HAVE SPOKEN


I just talked to my grandma about the whole shooting. Such a sweet old lady. anyways, I was floored when I head her start bitching about how there wasn't a single person around with a gun who could stop the shooter, and then told me she gave 20$ to the NRA.

Image
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Army of GOD on Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:43 pm

I'm pretty sure that girl was in Final Destination or some shit.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:57 pm

User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:55 am

Phatscotty wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Or Holmes propped the door open earlier, went to his car, donned the armor and guns, and then re-entered through the exit door.

The police confirmed this.


Maybe the guy is protecting his buddy. This is an interesting story

http://www.wkyc.com/news/article/252995 ... e-theater-
A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

He says he thinks someone deliberately let the gunman inside once the movie started.

Here's what he told TV station KCNC this morning live on their newscast.

Expanded coverage

"As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place."



And? That's a vague account. It still doesn't rule out the likelihood that the man with the cell phone who walked out the emergency door was also the shooter.

Besides, having another accomplice increases the risk unnecessarily for Holmes, so why outsource the job when it can just as effectively and safely be performed by himself?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:00 am

moved from TDKR

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
puppydog85 wrote:And the reason you knew you were safe? ;)


Phatscotty claims he knows how to handle a weapon. That's why he worded it the way he did...he likes to talk about it, so people won't think he's just a poser, but he hasn't figured out that's why so many of us think he's a poser. troll


:lol:

The reason I knew I was 100% safe is because there is a law saying nobody can bring guns into a movie theater. and there is sign outside the theater that says "no guns allowed on this premise"

8-)


So, a sign that says, "gun-free zone," somehow makes you safer? Recall how people with guns and the intent to kill don't really care about signs.


It was a joke.

Quick story. When Minnesota passed conceal and carry recently, there were articles all over our newspapers about how we were going to turn into the wild wild west, and there were going to be shootouts in the streets over minor disputes, chaos, anarchy etc.... Well the law passed, and businesses everywhere promptly put up sign saying "Guns not permitted on this property". It is not unlawful to ignore that sign though, and it's mostly for insurance reasons. However, what businesses soon realized was that their signs in fact attracted criminals. Slowly, those signed began to come down, and sanity has prevailed! Oh and btw, since the passage of conceal and carry (soon to be expanded to stand your ground) crime has plummeted.
Minnesota Crime Rate Falls to Lowest Level Since the Moon Landing
Violent crime is down in Minnesota across the board:

· Minnesota's homicide rate of 2.1 incidents per 100,000 residents is at its lowest level since 1985 (2.1), falling 4.5 percent from 2007.
· The rate of forcible rape of 34.6 is at the lowest level since 1990 (34.0), dropping 3.3 percent from a year ago.
· The robbery rate of 80.0 is down 12.9 percent from 2007 and marks a 4-year low.
· Likewise, the aggravated assault rate of 146.1 is at a 4-year low, and down 7.9 percent from 2007.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:23 am

How has Minnesota weathered the depression since 2008?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:35 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:How has Minnesota weathered the depression since 2008?


better than most, and for many reasons. Our real estate got crushed, of course not as bad as California or Florida, but our unemployment rate has never been above 8% (I think) and we currently boast a budget surplus. Many large Corporations are headquartered out of Minnesota. 3M, Medtronic, St Jude, General Mills, Best Buy, Target, United Health Group, Supervalu, Hormel, Polaris, Buffalo Wild Wings, Caribou Coffee, US Bank Corp, Xcel Energy, Fastenal, Valspar, TCF, Famous Daves, Toro, Ecolab, just to name a few.....

Plymouth, Minnesota, rated best city to live in all across America

We have always been a blue state (the only one to go for Mondale in 84) but in my lifetime I have considered it purple. Jesse Ventura got elected here, Michelle Bachmann will retire here, and Tim Pawlenty was re-elected here, but of course Al Franken (media matters/moveon.org) and Amy Klobochar (Soros) more than erase that.

I should note that, on a state level, the Tea Party dominated the Congressional elections in 2010, controlling super majorities. In fact the Tea Party Republican candidate Tom Emmer only lost by 6,000 votes to Mark Dayton (Soros), of the Billion dollar Dayton retail dynasty. We are getting everything from our platform that we wanted that we can do without the governor, and that includes constitutional amendments. This fall we are voting on Voter-ID, currently polling around 80% support, as well as expanding conceal carry laws and other things like tort reform and some kind of blockages of Obamacare.

The Ron Paul/Libertarian wing recently gained control of the state party here, and we have a Senate candidate running who Ron Paul has officially endorsed named Kurt Bills. We have a real chance to join Wisconsin and make Minnesota a red state this November, and I think it's because our policies are working pretty good on a state level, and our recent governor may very well be the next Vice President.

Thanks for asking. I love my state and love talking about it!
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby AAFitz on Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:43 am

Phatscotty wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:I read that one of the victims had previously survived a mass shooting at a mall in Toronto. That's pretty messed up. You survive one mass shooting, and then later you get killed in another mass shooting. What kind of luck did that lady have?


Dude needs to start playing the lotto.

It's a female, and she's dead, so I doubt she's going to start playing the lottery.


oh, missed the part about how she got killed. I thought we were talking about survivors.

:oops:


Oh, thats ok. That was just a relevant fact you ignored. Happens all the time, though this one, is somewhat inexplicable. Looks like you read the first sentence and ignored the third, which, isn't surprising, and would be funny, if your reply were not disgustingly inappropriate.

But again, not like its the first time. :roll:
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Baron Von PWN on Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:11 am

Phatscotty wrote:moved from TDKR

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
puppydog85 wrote:And the reason you knew you were safe? ;)


Phatscotty claims he knows how to handle a weapon. That's why he worded it the way he did...he likes to talk about it, so people won't think he's just a poser, but he hasn't figured out that's why so many of us think he's a poser. troll


:lol:

The reason I knew I was 100% safe is because there is a law saying nobody can bring guns into a movie theater. and there is sign outside the theater that says "no guns allowed on this premise"

8-)


So, a sign that says, "gun-free zone," somehow makes you safer? Recall how people with guns and the intent to kill don't really care about signs.


It was a joke.

Quick story. When Minnesota passed conceal and carry recently, there were articles all over our newspapers about how we were going to turn into the wild wild west, and there were going to be shootouts in the streets over minor disputes, chaos, anarchy etc.... Well the law passed, and businesses everywhere promptly put up sign saying "Guns not permitted on this property". It is not unlawful to ignore that sign though, and it's mostly for insurance reasons. However, what businesses soon realized was that their signs in fact attracted criminals. Slowly, those signed began to come down, and sanity has prevailed! Oh and btw, since the passage of conceal and carry (soon to be expanded to stand your ground) crime has plummeted.
Minnesota Crime Rate Falls to Lowest Level Since the Moon Landing
Violent crime is down in Minnesota across the board:

· Minnesota's homicide rate of 2.1 incidents per 100,000 residents is at its lowest level since 1985 (2.1), falling 4.5 percent from 2007.
· The rate of forcible rape of 34.6 is at the lowest level since 1990 (34.0), dropping 3.3 percent from a year ago.
· The robbery rate of 80.0 is down 12.9 percent from 2007 and marks a 4-year low.
· Likewise, the aggravated assault rate of 146.1 is at a 4-year low, and down 7.9 percent from 2007.


the two aren't necessarily related. It's probably some other factor and crime is likely unrelated to gun ownership levels (though how amounts of gun ownership likely increases lethality of crime).
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:53 am

Baron Von PWN wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:moved from TDKR

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
puppydog85 wrote:And the reason you knew you were safe? ;)


Phatscotty claims he knows how to handle a weapon. That's why he worded it the way he did...he likes to talk about it, so people won't think he's just a poser, but he hasn't figured out that's why so many of us think he's a poser. troll


:lol:

The reason I knew I was 100% safe is because there is a law saying nobody can bring guns into a movie theater. and there is sign outside the theater that says "no guns allowed on this premise"

8-)


So, a sign that says, "gun-free zone," somehow makes you safer? Recall how people with guns and the intent to kill don't really care about signs.


It was a joke.

Quick story. When Minnesota passed conceal and carry recently, there were articles all over our newspapers about how we were going to turn into the wild wild west, and there were going to be shootouts in the streets over minor disputes, chaos, anarchy etc.... Well the law passed, and businesses everywhere promptly put up sign saying "Guns not permitted on this property". It is not unlawful to ignore that sign though, and it's mostly for insurance reasons. However, what businesses soon realized was that their signs in fact attracted criminals. Slowly, those signed began to come down, and sanity has prevailed! Oh and btw, since the passage of conceal and carry (soon to be expanded to stand your ground) crime has plummeted.
Minnesota Crime Rate Falls to Lowest Level Since the Moon Landing
Violent crime is down in Minnesota across the board:

· Minnesota's homicide rate of 2.1 incidents per 100,000 residents is at its lowest level since 1985 (2.1), falling 4.5 percent from 2007.
· The rate of forcible rape of 34.6 is at the lowest level since 1990 (34.0), dropping 3.3 percent from a year ago.
· The robbery rate of 80.0 is down 12.9 percent from 2007 and marks a 4-year low.
· Likewise, the aggravated assault rate of 146.1 is at a 4-year low, and down 7.9 percent from 2007.


the two aren't necessarily related. It's probably some other factor and crime is likely unrelated to gun ownership levels (though how amounts of gun ownership likely increases lethality of crime).


Most of the supposed explanations listed in Table 1 actually played little direct role in the crime decline, including the strong economy of the 1990s, changing demo-graphics, better policing strategies, gun control laws, concealed weapons laws and increased use of the death penalty. Four factors, however, can account for virtually all of the observed decline in crime: increases in the number of police, the rising prison population, the waning crack epidemic and the legalization of abortion.[1
]

(1st and 2nd pages, http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CFUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpricetheory.uchicago.edu%2Flevitt%2FPapers%2FLevittUnderstandingWhyCrime2004.pdf&ei=US0MUO73KeHI2gXW4bkf&usg=AFQjCNHqWNThdafe1fxUvsHYaYU9hIMKKQ

But it's highly debatable.

Others mention the change in laws during the 1990s regarding private security (i.e. deregulation, or freer market for law and order/security), whose officers now total more than public police officers.

Malcolm Gladwell in his book The Tipping Point suggests that a change in policing strategies in NY which arresting for misdemeanors more fiercely and the cleaning up of subway cars were the main causes.

Mark Kleiman (When Brute Force Fails) mentions causes which work more effectively in reducing crime:

show

http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9018.html
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Woodruff on Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:26 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:Et tu, Mr Destructo? sums up my feelings concerning gun control on this case precisely:

Image


Eh, Phatscotty could've taken him. You have no faith!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Woodruff on Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:28 pm

john9blue wrote:i have always wondered why nobody in a crowd will tackle/subdue someone who is firing a gun at them.


It happens, actually. There was a teacher at a recent school shooting that went chasing after one of the gunmen. But most people don't have the training to understand how to do such a thing without being killed in the process or the reaction responses to react that quickly, and so end up Phatscottying behind a wall somewhere. You have to keep in mind that this sort of thing doesn't take much time.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Woodruff on Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:35 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Most of the supposed explanations listed in Table 1 actually played little direct role in the crime decline, including the strong economy of the 1990s, changing demo-graphics, better policing strategies, gun control laws, concealed weapons laws and increased use of the death penalty. Four factors, however, can account for virtually all of the observed decline in crime: increases in the number of police, the rising prison population, the waning crack epidemic and the legalization of abortion.[1
]


I find myself exceptionally confused by that fourth one. Anyone care to explain how that particularly decreases crime (other than the fact that it specifically isn't a crime itself, I guess?)?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:02 pm

Woodruff wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Most of the supposed explanations listed in Table 1 actually played little direct role in the crime decline, including the strong economy of the 1990s, changing demo-graphics, better policing strategies, gun control laws, concealed weapons laws and increased use of the death penalty. Four factors, however, can account for virtually all of the observed decline in crime: increases in the number of police, the rising prison population, the waning crack epidemic and the legalization of abortion.[1
]


I find myself exceptionally confused by that fourth one. Anyone care to explain how that particularly decreases crime (other than the fact that it specifically isn't a crime itself, I guess?)?


There's a strong positive correlation between being an unwanted child and seeking a life of crime (I forget the exact variables used because I read that article years ago). When abortion was legalized, a large portion of abortions were due to reasons like "can't afford the kid." This spike in abortions is reflected in later decreased crime because had those kids been born, there would've been an upward pressure on crime. In other words, the loss of unwanted kids later resulted in a decrease in crime.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:09 pm

It's also "common sense" that a criminal will prefer to commit crime in a place where they know there aren't any opposing guns.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby comic boy on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:41 pm

Its common sense that fewer guns will lead to fewer homocides but common sense is in short supply it seems :(
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: shoulda hadda gun?

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:46 pm

comic boy wrote:Its common sense that fewer guns will lead to fewer homocides but common sense is in short supply it seems :(


It's common sense that fewer guns means force abusers will be the only ones who have them.

Are you a Communist sir?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users