Phatscotty wrote:maasman wrote:I'm pretty sure that if those things existed, I would still be able to walk down the street, go where ever I please on public property, vote for whoever I want, buy guns in the same ways, and the list goes on. So no, equality doesn't mean you don't get liberty, it just means that you get more equality.
And how is equality implemented? It costs money right? Don't you have to take money away from one person before you can give it to another? Would you be able to keep more than half of your paycheck? PePer controlling resources on a national level; doesn't that mean you likely won't be able to control your own thermostat in your home (already a reality in some places)? Per democratizing our banking and financial system; won't that likely end up shrinking opportunity for those sectors? Per achieving an adequate standard of health care, nutrition, housing, and safety; how can you do that without making an unequal choice about who and how much is to be taken from one person who earned the money, and to who and how much will be given to another person that did not earn the money. The definition won't be and can't be truly equal, but I will concede you originally stated "what is realistically possible".
and for the ways in which I believe are obvious perversions of liberty.....
Per a guaranteed salary for all adults; I don't think I need to get into that one and how liberty is impacted...do I???
Per Universal health care, child care, vacation time, and lifelong access to education and training; Ummmmm see above
A tax system based on the ability to pay???? This is straight up Marxism, Socialism, Communism, whatever you want to call it, which is most definitely not compatible with any kind of liberty. If you want to call it "Change us into Greece" that will work too.
It's HUGE government, will require HUGE borrowing, with that comes HUGE interest payments on our children. Oh, our children would be so lucky to only have so much liberty.
To be shackled by the chains of the previous generations profligate spending and debts is practically equal to an all you can eat liberty buffet!
Thomas Jefferson knew a tad about Liberty.
āIt is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.ā
So were you ever going to delineate the liberties that would be lost, or did you plan to just continue to distract from maasman's question until it's forgotten?
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:As for specific kinds of liberty.....what are the options here?
It's wide open - any kind you can think of. So answer his damn question instead of trying to avoid it, you poser.Mind your own damn business! Holy shit lmao!!!!
Yes, it is terrible when someone tries to actually hold you accountable for your statements, isn't it? If you don't like it, stop posting in a public forum.



























































































