Moderator: Community Team



























TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Seriously guys, you don't need a private forum. There's already forum games. If the thread was subjected to trolling, then it would be dealt with by moderators accordingly.
-TG

























































BigBallinStalin wrote:Why don't we start a D&D thread only as a trap to troll the trolls?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








BigBallinStalin wrote:Why don't we start a D&D thread only as a trap to troll the trolls?














natty dread wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Why don't we start a D&D thread only as a trap to troll the trolls?
Where do you think you're posting?











































saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










macbone wrote:OK, I'm game if you guys are.
If you're interested in GURPS fantasy, I can post some information and links to character building material. I'll probably run a GURPS adventure that has a mix of investigation, exploration, and combat. I'll start up an OOC thread to get things rolling, and when we're ready to play, I'll begin an IC thread with the actual action.
If GURPS is a no-go for you guys, I'd be willing to play, but I've only GMed GURPS and WEG Star Wars, so I'd be useless at D&D or any other system. =)

















































saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










IcePack wrote:-1 to gurp
+1 to other










Drakkon wrote:I have only played D&D 3.5, what is GURPS?




























tkr4lf wrote:That seems incredibly complicated.










Woodruff wrote:tkr4lf wrote:That seems incredibly complicated.
It's not nearly as complicated as it may appear to someone who doesn't play a lot of live RPGs. It is more complicated than AD&D, but that's also what gives it more "life" (i.e. flexibility).


















tkr4lf wrote:Woodruff wrote:tkr4lf wrote:That seems incredibly complicated.
It's not nearly as complicated as it may appear to someone who doesn't play a lot of live RPGs. It is more complicated than AD&D, but that's also what gives it more "life" (i.e. flexibility).
I don't know, I've never played a live RPG. I'm vaguely familiar with D&D/AD&D, but only from computer RPGs.
It does seem cool that you can adjust it for any scenario you would like. That could be fun, to do a live RPG set in the current world, or in the future, instead of a regular medieval setting.
I can't say for sure whether I'll take part or not. I would like to, but I'm not certain that I can dedicate the time necessary. Is it pretty intensive? Does it require lot's of time/dedication?














































Woodruff wrote:Come on you guys...are you mice or men?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.












Users browsing this forum: No registered users