bob is a racist

[Woodruff]

How many times has Natty called people a racist just for criticizing Obama? How about Juan Bottom, Pimpdave, Symmetry, and Woodruff? ......exactly

The burden of proof lies with you here. I cant recall Natty ever calling anyone racist because they oppose Obama; and Im sure I would have seen it seeing as Obama isnt exactly mr popular on these boards.

"Burden"......

To get you started
Here

Here

Here

Gosh, it only took you a freaking month to find three quotes that don't show what you claim they would show? Hell, the first one is the only one that even has a hint of being on the subject. The other two aren't even relevant. That's your evidence?

I don't know... speaking as an outside observer who really doesn't have an emotional investment in this debate, I'd say the second one in the group is pretty spot-on.

So then you believe the reason he uses Obama's complete name and only Romney's last name is?

[Dukasaur]

How many times has Natty called people a racist just for criticizing Obama? How about Juan Bottom, Pimpdave, Symmetry, and Woodruff? ......exactly

The burden of proof lies with you here. I cant recall Natty ever calling anyone racist because they oppose Obama; and Im sure I would have seen it seeing as Obama isnt exactly mr popular on these boards.

"Burden"......

To get you started
Here

Here

Here

Gosh, it only took you a freaking month to find three quotes that don't show what you claim they would show? Hell, the first one is the only one that even has a hint of being on the subject. The other two aren't even relevant. That's your evidence?

I don't know... speaking as an outside observer who really doesn't have an emotional investment in this debate, I'd say the second one in the group is pretty spot-on.

So then you believe the reason he uses Obama's complete name and only Romney's last name is?

He supports Romney, so of course he's going to paint him in the most positive light possible. That includes tying him as strongly as possible to the name "Romney" which sounds like a good, strong Celtic warrior with a fist like iron, rather than to "Mitt" which sounds like a prepubescent boy that might have hung out after school with Beaver Cleaver. Contrariwise, he opposes Obama, so he's going to paint him in the most negative light possible, which includes slipping in as many references as possible to "Hussain" which is of course a name that ties him to numerous Arab terrorists.

Your allegation that he's a racist speaks to motive. But as a shill, his job is to use whatever words will work to create a desired effect in the minds of the audience, regardless of his personal views. There's no reason to assume any particular motive. Using words that create negative connotations for the competitor's product doesn't make him a racist (even if those words were explicitly racist, which they aren't) or anything else, any more than for a convention shill to offer you free drinks makes him an alcoholic.

[Woodruff]

The burden of proof lies with you here. I cant recall Natty ever calling anyone racist because they oppose Obama; and Im sure I would have seen it seeing as Obama isnt exactly mr popular on these boards.

"Burden"......

To get you started
Here

Here

Here

Gosh, it only took you a freaking month to find three quotes that don't show what you claim they would show? Hell, the first one is the only one that even has a hint of being on the subject. The other two aren't even relevant. That's your evidence?

I don't know... speaking as an outside observer who really doesn't have an emotional investment in this debate, I'd say the second one in the group is pretty spot-on.

So then you believe the reason he uses Obama's complete name and only Romney's last name is?

He supports Romney, so of course he's going to paint him in the most positive light possible. That includes tying him as strongly as possible to the name "Romney" which sounds like a good, strong Celtic warrior with a fist like iron, rather than to "Mitt" which sounds like a prepubescent boy that might have hung out after school with Beaver Cleaver. Contrariwise, he opposes Obama, so he's going to paint him in the most negative light possible, which includes slipping in as many references as possible to "Hussain" which is of course a name that ties him to numerous Arab terrorists.

Your allegation that he's a racist speaks to motive. But as a shill, his job is to use whatever words will work to create a desired effect in the minds of the audience, regardless of his personal views. There's no reason to assume any particular motive. Using words that create negative connotations for the competitor's product doesn't make him a racist (even if those words were explicitly racist, which they aren't) or anything else, any more than for a convention shill to offer you free drinks makes him an alcoholic.

Bad analogy. The convention shill isn't using the alcohol himself, so it makes no sense to consider him an alcoholic. Such is not the case with Phatscotty.

In addition, it's not just this single bit of data to be viewed in a vacuum. Tie it in to his attacks against the poor and other policy supports he has, and the picture becomes much more clear.

All that said, your argument is a reasonable one. It's one I disagree with it, but it has merit.

[Phatscotty]

The burden of proof lies with you here. I cant recall Natty ever calling anyone racist because they oppose Obama; and Im sure I would have seen it seeing as Obama isnt exactly mr popular on these boards.

"Burden"......

To get you started
Here

Here

Here

Gosh, it only took you a freaking month to find three quotes that don't show what you claim they would show? Hell, the first one is the only one that even has a hint of being on the subject. The other two aren't even relevant. That's your evidence?

I don't know... speaking as an outside observer who really doesn't have an emotional investment in this debate, I'd say the second one in the group is pretty spot-on.

So then you believe the reason he uses Obama's complete name and only Romney's last name is?

He supports Romney, so of course he's going to paint him in the most positive light possible. That includes tying him as strongly as possible to the name "Romney" which sounds like a good, strong Celtic warrior with a fist like iron, rather than to "Mitt" which sounds like a prepubescent boy that might have hung out after school with Beaver Cleaver. Contrariwise, he opposes Obama, so he's going to paint him in the most negative light possible, which includes slipping in as many references as possible to "Hussain" which is of course a name that ties him to numerous Arab terrorists.

Your allegation that he's a racist speaks to motive. But as a shill, his job is to use whatever words will work to create a desired effect in the minds of the audience, regardless of his personal views. There's no reason to assume any particular motive. Using words that create negative connotations for the competitor's product doesn't make him a racist (even if those words were explicitly racist, which they aren't) or anything else, any more than for a convention shill to offer you free drinks makes him an alcoholic.

I like what you say here. Very observant and very clever. Only one thing...again this is all over a trolled and edited version of what I said and taken out of context. Here's a great example from recent history of how these guys troll

ala viewtopic.php?f=8&t=177067&p=3917039&hilit=brag#p3916574