Moderator: Community Team
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:I don't like whiny bitches that take pot shots at me when I'm not even involved in a thread.
xelabale wrote:it doesn't mention you prowler
TheProwler wrote:If you want a little private chat, use the private messages. You posted in a public forum. "addressed to captain.c" Hahaha! Bullshit! You actually asked for "members of the NWO" to post.
TheProwler wrote:You are naive.
No electricity.
That means no running water
...no natural gas
...no sewage
...no grocery store
...no modern transportation
...no long range communication
etc.
You are out of your tree if you think the people here on CC could rebuild the power grid. Especially among with the chaotic fight for survival that would take place within weeks.
Snorri1234 wrote:Wow. Why do you guys keep feeding the troll so much?
Snorri1234 wrote:Wow. Why do you guys keep feeding the troll so much?
xelabale wrote:You know what, you're an idiot. Who said anything about rebuilding the power grid. Why'd we want to do that? We're not going to try to replicate this civilisation, what a step backwards that would be! If the apocalypse came, the people who were left would rebuild a civilisation. It wouldn't be done in a week or a year or a generation, but it'd get done. You think waving a gun around's gonna make a difference, you're the last person we're going to need to rebuild.
HapSmo19 wrote:
It's gonna be so perfect.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
xelabale wrote:You saidTheProwler wrote:I don't like whiny bitches that take pot shots at me when I'm not even involved in a thread.
I saidxelabale wrote:it doesn't mention you prowler
You saidTheProwler wrote:If you want a little private chat, use the private messages. You posted in a public forum. "addressed to captain.c" Hahaha! Bullshit! You actually asked for "members of the NWO" to post.
I fear you are attacking me rather than the points in question Prowler. Is that because you are focussing on the person rather than the ideas? Are your points so undefendable you need to attack me instead, because triple-posting and shouting louder than others doesn't make for a rational debate.
xelabale wrote:TheProwler wrote:You are naive.
No electricity.
That means no running water
...no natural gas
...no sewage
...no grocery store
...no modern transportation
...no long range communication
etc.
You are out of your tree if you think the people here on CC could rebuild the power grid. Especially among with the chaotic fight for survival that would take place within weeks.
You know what, you're an idiot. Who said anything about rebuilding the power grid. Why'd we want to do that? We're not going to try to replicate this civilisation, what a step backwards that would be! If the apocalypse came, the people who were left would rebuild a civilisation. It wouldn't be done in a week or a year or a generation, but it'd get done. You think waving a gun around's gonna make a difference, you're the last person we're going to need to rebuild.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
thegreekdog wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Wow. Why do you guys keep feeding the troll so much?
As I said, "Whee!" However, his latest post, directed at me... more "Yawn." than "Whee!" Erego, no need for me to reply.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
jay_a2j wrote:HapSmo19 wrote:
It's gonna be so perfect.
Far from it. But you go ahead and enjoy it.
HapSmo19 wrote:xelabale wrote:You know what, you're an idiot. Who said anything about rebuilding the power grid. Why'd we want to do that? We're not going to try to replicate this civilisation, what a step backwards that would be! If the apocalypse came, the people who were left would rebuild a civilisation. It wouldn't be done in a week or a year or a generation, but it'd get done. You think waving a gun around's gonna make a difference, you're the last person we're going to need to rebuild.
You're right. Once the U.S. government collapses, there will be no more war or need to defend yourself. It's gonna be a total utopia. Forget history and human nature, the world has just been waiting for the "evil capitalist empire"(that's only been around for about the last two-hundred years) to fall so it can get on with the peace/love that it would've been all along if that scourge had never came to be in the first place.
Wheeeeeeeeee...........
It's gonna be so perfect.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
xelabale wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Wow. Why do you guys keep feeding the troll so much?
Underneath it all Prowler occasionally has some good contributions to add to a conversation, and I think he's genuine on this issue. I wish he'd just address the points in the initial post rather than flying onto the attack - it seems like there's no answer from the NWO believers so far...
xelabale wrote:So if captain c's cogent well-thought out theories are true, as all the evidence points to, I have a question: Why?
Why do "they" want a NWO, it seems like such hard work. Admittedly I'm a bit lazy, but I don't get it. I mean, these guys are already powerful and rich enough to decide the next president (ask cap'n c for proof), what more do they want? I'd've thought they were pretty happy with the current world order, seeing as they're at the top of it. Surely a shake up might end up with plebs like us at the top instead.
If anyone out there is part of the NWO could you enlighten me as to what it is you're after. Personally I'd be quite happy to just let you have it, it might save a bit of hassle all round, but I don't know what it is you want!
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:Hahaha!
I think you might have to explain that you were being sarcastic.
f*ck, xelabale thinks we'd all walk around sharing and caring like some big hippie commune. He hasn't really thought ahead to when the food supply runs out.
TheProwler wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Wow. Why do you guys keep feeding the troll so much?
As I said, "Whee!" However, his latest post, directed at me... more "Yawn." than "Whee!" Erego, no need for me to reply.
Yeah, pretty hard to bullshit your way out of this one:
I've never said I think the NWO will "unleash an apocalypse". Why do you make these assumptions? This is why you are always misunderstanding. You assume I think something that I do not.
It clearly shows that you make assumptions.
It clearly asks you to explain why you make these assumptions.
You feel no need to reply because you have no way to explain without looking like a tool.
TheProwler wrote:Woodruff wrote:TheProwler wrote:Woodruff wrote:But yet again, you are overlooking the obvious...these people are allegedly ALREADY IN CONTROL for the most part. Since they are evil masters and have put themselves in that position, we'll presume that they're NOT COMPLETELY STUPID. IF they are, in fact, NOT completely stupid, then WHY would they want to put themselves into a position where they would NOT BE in control, for the most part? None of you has cleared this up. Since you're talking about how stupid we are, perhaps you could give it a go?
First off, don't assume that I agree with everything others on "my side" of the argument say.
Here's your question: "WHY would they want to put themselves into a position where they would NOT BE in control, for the most part?"
They wouldn't. When did I say they would?
The fact that you haven't even slightly attempted to counter their statements is why ANYONE would think you agree with them. Are you too afraid to point out the errors that your side is making? Or are you simply unable to?
You know what? I asked you a question. If you don't have enough manners to respond to my question, please refrain from asking me two new questions. I can only be overly polite for so long.
TheProwler wrote:xelabale thinks we'd all walk around sharing and caring like some big hippie commune. He hasn't really thought ahead to when the food supply runs out.
TheProwler wrote:I gave you the answer. I don't know what other people think, but that is what I think. It is to position themselves to be in a position of control after one, or several, devastating (natural or man-made) catastrophes.
BTW, the shit might hit the fan before the biggest disaster actually hits. Like if we start getting nailed by asteroids and someone leaks out that there is a biggie coming. Mass hysteria. And they need to maintain control for their own survival. If it gets out that 90% of the population is going to die because there are only enough supplies stockpiled for 10% of people, or that 10% is the total number of people that can fit in the underground shelters, what do you think would happen? Do you think that society might revolt?
So they are actually planning for before the catastrophes, too.
But let's not worry too much about that. I should try to keep the answers as short and simple as possible for you.
Woodruff wrote:TheProwler wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I have a pretty relevant question - how do small arms do, generally speaking, against nuclear weapons? Because, frankly, if the NWO uses nuclear weapons, I'm not quite sure how my hypothetical handgun is going to counter said nuclear weapons. Further, if the NWO uses some sort of biological threat and holes up in some underground bunker, will it matter if we all had firearms?
I guess my point is, your insistence that we be well-armed may have good intentions, but will it truly be effective?
Holy shit man, use your fuckin' head.
After immense global destruction, nuclear weapons will not function. Do you think you can launch a missile without electricity?
When your enemies (the people you want to control) are living 1 mile away from you, do you think nuking them is a good idea?
I am talking about post-catastrophe. This is all a setup for that. With no catastrophe, the powers that be would be happy with the status quo. They are planning for the future.
They don't want to hole up in a bunker and then come out and work for themselves. They want to hole up in a bunker and then come out and rule the fuckin' world. What fuckin' words don't you understand?
Honestly, the stupidity of people on this site is frustrating.
But yet again, you are overlooking the obvious...these people are allegedly ALREADY IN CONTROL for the most part. Since they are evil masters and have put themselves in that position, we'll presume that they're NOT COMPLETELY STUPID. IF they are, in fact, NOT completely stupid, then WHY would they want to put themselves into a position where they would NOT BE in control, for the most part? None of you has cleared this up. Since you're talking about how stupid we are, perhaps you could give it a go?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:Go ahead, watch this and part 2. And continue saying it's a bunch of wacky conspiracy theorists.
I DARE YOU.
xelabale wrote:TheProwler wrote:I gave you the answer. I don't know what other people think, but that is what I think. It is to position themselves to be in a position of control after one, or several, devastating (natural or man-made) catastrophes.
BTW, the shit might hit the fan before the biggest disaster actually hits. Like if we start getting nailed by asteroids and someone leaks out that there is a biggie coming. Mass hysteria. And they need to maintain control for their own survival. If it gets out that 90% of the population is going to die because there are only enough supplies stockpiled for 10% of people, or that 10% is the total number of people that can fit in the underground shelters, what do you think would happen? Do you think that society might revolt?
So they are actually planning for before the catastrophes, too.
But let's not worry too much about that. I should try to keep the answers as short and simple as possible for you.
So let me get this straight - they are positioning themselves to be in control after the catastrophes. They are doing this by:
- Using fluoride in the water. This will help after the catastrophe by, er, keeping people's teeth strong thus they will spend time looking at themselves in the mirror instead of getting angry at the NWO elite who were in power before and are now in power again.
- Contrails - these help by, er, poisoning us. But not them. They are immune.
- Putting mercury in vaccines - this helps by, er, making people a bit mentally unstable, perfect for mind control purposes when the white teeth are no longer enough.
- Purposely destroying the economy - this helps by, er, destroying their power base now so they can be even more incognito later I guess??
- They will impose a world currency by April 2009. I mean they did. I mean they would've, I mean they should've, it says so in Isiah.. This would've helped by, er, making them rich now, which would have helped after the catastrophe by, er, well, don't worry about it it didn't happen anyway.
They are worried that being powerful enough to control who gets elected will not help them after the catastrophe. These guys should just chill and enjoy the power they have now.
A further question - what will they need to control the world post-society?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
xelabale wrote:So is my analysis wrong?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
Snorri1234 wrote:No prowler is just a troll.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users