Non-VANILLA Game 3 *Game Over* 14 Winners

[Aimless]

Anyway, this whole ordeal is sounding rather complicated. How would the mafia even know who the doctor was to role-block him/her? Why didn't they just kill the doc if they knew? It doesn't add up... Besides, it might be that aimless is the one behind the killing, trying to disguise it behind the fact that he would have to be an idiot to have done it. And he is being more defensive than necessary.

FOS Aimless.

If the doc was roleblocked, I think it was entirely by accident. The Doc might have been one of the more suspicious players on Day 1, or one of the more experienced players, or just hit by dumb luck.

As for being more defensive than necessary... hmmm. Yeah, when I step back and look at it, I probably am. Well, I brought the point up to begin with because I thought it would be better for the town to hash out this argument now, rather than leave it for some intrepid thread miner later in the game.

[sheepofdumb]

Well now that I have school the amount of post's I make will be few. I also want to get back into WoW.

[pancakemix]

Or it was a good guess by the mafia roleblocker.

[Colaalone]

The fact that Aimless immediately brought up the issue of being framed, tends to make me think he planned this.
Though I find it hard to actually credit this as evidence and worthy of a vote.
FOS

[sheepofdumb]

We may never know.

[unriggable]

Okay I missed quite a bit (most turned out to be useless)!

Things I realized:
1. There was one nightkill, I know fircoal well enough to know that he would include three killing roles (and there definitly aren't two docs).
2. The one kill (mandy) was done by a mafia janitor, so that leaves a vig and an SK who did not post their night action.
3. Anybody who logs on regularly would remember to turn in their night actions. There is a list a few pages back done by AD that shows five or six people who do not participate regularly, they might not have logges on in time to send their night actions.

My conclusion - one, maybe even two of these five has a killing role. I'm probably wrong though.

[Anarkistsdream]

Okay I missed quite a bit (most turned out to be useless)!

Things I realized:
1. There was one nightkill, I know fircoal well enough to know that he would include three killing roles (and there definitly aren't two docs).
2. The one kill (mandy) was done by a mafia janitor, so that leaves a vig and an SK who did not post their night action.
3. Anybody who logs on regularly would remember to turn in their night actions. There is a list a few pages back done by AD that shows five or six people who do not participate regularly, they might not have logges on in time to send their night actions.

My conclusion - one, maybe even two of these five has a killing role. I'm probably wrong though.

No, no,I agree with you.

[jnd94]

well you would know, cuz ur scuuuum!!!!!!! *goes into rage and has to be held by psychiatrists*


.......no, not the jacket....noo not the shot, anything but the shot...

[sheepofdumb]

Okay I missed quite a bit (most turned out to be useless)!

Things I realized:
1. There was one nightkill, I know fircoal well enough to know that he would include three killing roles (and there definitly aren't two docs).
2. The one kill (mandy) was done by a mafia janitor, so that leaves a vig and an SK who did not post their night action.
3. Anybody who logs on regularly would remember to turn in their night actions. There is a list a few pages back done by AD that shows five or six people who do not participate regularly, they might not have logges on in time to send their night actions.

My conclusion - one, maybe even two of these five has a killing role. I'm probably wrong though.

They could be hiding in the pile of quiet people. O.o

It makes sense. Guess we will have to go through them one by one just to make sure.

[jnd94]

i say we lynch each one, one by one

[unriggable]

That's nuts. Unit2 I think is least suspicious since I know he logged on a few days back, during nighttime.

[pancakemix]

Only scum and n00bs want to lynch inactives. Vote to replace inactives

Since you are both n00bs, You're off the hook this time, but I'm watching you.

[Aimless]

Okay I missed quite a bit (most turned out to be useless)!

Things I realized:
1. There was one nightkill, I know fircoal well enough to know that he would include three killing roles (and there definitly aren't two docs).
2. The one kill (mandy) was done by a mafia janitor, so that leaves a vig and an SK who did not post their night action.
3. Anybody who logs on regularly would remember to turn in their night actions. There is a list a few pages back done by AD that shows five or six people who do not participate regularly, they might not have logges on in time to send their night actions.

My conclusion - one, maybe even two of these five has a killing role. I'm probably wrong though.

This is good. And, I think it is definitely strange that there was only one kill last night.

Of that list... hmmm. Primate or Puff seem to be the most likely suspects. Unit_2 never participates, so I don't think that counts as a tell. Hitman and Shadowstar seem to be the same way.

Puff is usually active though. And Primate is experienced, although he hasn't done anything yet. Could be a sign he just wants to slip in under the radar.

[Anarkistsdream]

That is why I voted Primate.

[unriggable]

The main problem is that we come across this possibility:
One person, the SK, sent their night action, which was protected by the doc. Therefore one of those five (four under my idea) who did not send their night action is the VIG. If we lynch him were at a disadvantage.

[sheepofdumb]

It took us 51 pages to start talking about them. I'm going to guess they were thinking we would just ask to replace them.

[Colaalone]

FOS: Aimless
Colaalone
Got Tonkaed

Why?

[Aimless]

I think I agree with you on that one.

Vote: Primate

[Anarkistsdream]

The main problem is that we come across this possibility:
One person, the SK, sent their night action, which was protected by the doc. Therefore one of those five (four under my idea) who did not send their night action is the VIG. If we lynch him were at a disadvantage.

But what about the mafia? You didn't even mention them...

Sounds to me like you keep implying something...

[unriggable]

The main problem is that we come across this possibility:
One person, the SK, sent their night action, which was protected by the doc. Therefore one of those five (four under my idea) who did not send their night action is the VIG. If we lynch him were at a disadvantage.

But what about the mafia? You didn't even mention them...

Sounds to me like you keep implying something...

Mafia definitly did their kill since there is a janitor who wiped the spot clean.

[Anarkistsdream]

The main problem is that we come across this possibility:
One person, the SK, sent their night action, which was protected by the doc. Therefore one of those five (four under my idea) who did not send their night action is the VIG. If we lynch him were at a disadvantage.

But what about the mafia? You didn't even mention them...

Sounds to me like you keep implying something...

Mafia definitly did their kill since there is a janitor who wiped the spot clean.

AHHHHH! I see... Okay...

We can't assume that just because the role is unknown that it is a mafia cleaner, though.

[unriggable]

We can't assume that just because the role is unknown that it is a mafia cleaner, though.

When else does that happen?

[pancakemix]

Aimless, you are acting very out of character. It is not like you to vote without hearing from someone. FOS Aimless

Also, as for Unriggable's conclusion, that is possible, and the reason why I voted to replace. It is stupid to randomly kill people who submarine, and yesterday provides an excellent example.

[jnd94]

im not positive yet, but i cant tell if a mafia killed mando or another killer. Im thinkin mafia just cuz if there it was another killer, we would ahve know mando's role

[everywhere116]

Aimless pretending he was framed could be an out. I rhink that is suspicious.

Fos Aimless