Moderator: Community Team







Woodruff wrote:oVo wrote:Suh is the first defensive player to be named AP Player of the Year.
He really should have won the Heisman.





















king sam wrote:Woodruff wrote:oVo wrote:Suh is the first defensive player to be named AP Player of the Year.
He really should have won the Heisman.
hes an amazing talent, but I just dont see how you can give him or even Gerhardt the nod over other candidates that lead their teams to a perfect regular season...










Woodruff wrote:The Heisman isn't a team award, so the team's record should be irrelevant to it. In fact, if anything, I would suggest that a team's record should be held AGAINST a player if it's that good because perhaps the player wouldn't really be that outstanding without the strength of his teammates around him. In other words, a stronger team means the individual has to do less to stand out.





















king sam wrote:if anyone wants to do a bowl pick em I created a group on the ESPN site so we can all do it together and see whos predictions are the most accurate.
Heres the link:
http://games.espn.go.com/bowlmania/en/frontpage
make an account with ESPN if you dont already have one
- once you get there select "my groups"
- then create/join a group
- In the search box type in the league name Conquer Club
- Password is CC Pick em
Then your in, select your name and make your picks.
Good Luck




























king sam wrote:king sam wrote:if anyone wants to do a bowl pick em I created a group on the ESPN site so we can all do it together and see whos predictions are the most accurate.
Heres the link:
http://games.espn.go.com/bowlmania/en/frontpage
make an account with ESPN if you dont already have one
- once you get there select "my groups"
- then create/join a group
- In the search box type in the league name Conquer Club
- Password is CC Pick em
Then your in, select your name and make your picks.
Good Luck
hawkeye is leading right now with a total prediction of 3 right and 1 wrong.
Seems the Middle Tenn game gave everyone fits, as no one predicted that one right



























TheMissionary wrote:Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.





















king sam wrote:TheMissionary wrote:Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.







Bowl Tallies so far wrote:Mountain West 3-0
Big East _ 2-0
Sun Belt _ 1-0
C-USA _ 2-2
PAC 10 _ 1-2
MAC _ 0-1
ACC _ 0-2
WAC _ _0-2
SEC _ _ 0-0
Big Ten _ 0-0
Big 12 _ 0-0







king sam wrote:TheMissionary wrote:Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.










Woodruff wrote:king sam wrote:TheMissionary wrote:Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.
I ALMOST changed my Nevada pick to SMU, because of the two big rushers being out. Then I thought...sure, June Jones is there, but it's SM-freaking-U and kept it the same. Oh, and I had a confidence of 30 on it (which I DEFINITELY should have had the sense to change, regardless). Dammit.



























Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









strike wolf wrote:SMU blew out Nevada? wasn't this the necxt best tem after Boise in the WAC? OR am I mistaken. Either way this bowl season isn't loolking good so far for the wac. course it isn't looking too good for the PAC 10 either.







strike wolf wrote:SMU blew out Nevada? wasn't this the necxt best tem after Boise in the WAC? OR am I mistaken. Either way this bowl season isn't loolking good so far for the wac. course it isn't looking too good for the PAC 10 either.
























Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!






















oVo wrote:Ohio U. is trying to make a game of it. Starting with a goal line stand to end the first half... they've come back from 21 down. A blocked a punt just led to a FG making it 21-17 in the 3rd quarter...
but Marshall --held scoreless in the second half-- hangs on to win it.
So did you go with Pitt's offense or Carolina's defense?
Pittsburgh 19 North Carolina 17 Final
Pitt drove 79 yards in 16 plays burning 8:43 off of the clock to take the lead with 0:56 left.
Pitt had 4th & 2 on the UNC 30 with 1:55 to play and the Tarheel D gave away a 1st down with an offsides call.



























Bowl Record by Conference wrote:Mountain West 3-0
Big East _ 2-0
Big Ten _ 1-0
Sun Belt _ 1-0
C-USA _ 2-2
PAC 10 _ 2-2
SEC _ 1-1
ACC _ 1-3
Big 12 _ 0-1
MAC _ 0-2
WAC _ 0-2























































Users browsing this forum: No registered users