Moderator: Community Team
PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:Never said they were.Phatscotty wrote:Rehab isn't always the answer anyways, so you are wrong too.Here, I disagree as I explained above.Phatscotty wrote:The person needs to decide to be ready before rehab is every going to work, and threatening to cut off an addicts welfare check is a great time for the addict to decide.
My point was that you were wrong.. yet you keep attempting to bounce around and STILL cannot even admit honestly that you were just wrong. (and yes, I admit when I am wrong, frequently.. but holding and opinion that differs from yours doesn't mean I am wrong. Putting down incorrect information does.)
ALSO, you STILL don't seem to get that the problem here is not even as much cutting off welfare checks for convicted of drug use, it is testing ALL APPLICANTS and randomly testing others.. amounts that are only refunded if they happen to actually qualify for welfare. THAT is the biggest problem. This program is not designed to catch people on drugs, it is designed to earn money for the testing company and to penalize anyone who dares APPLY for welfare.
I specifically remember copy-pasting it. You have less proof that the post in question does not exist. I wonder if anyone else with any amount of honor can throw it on the line and say the remember reading that post?![]()
I can't find it and I'm wondering if it might have been in another link, as this debate has spilled over into other threads thanks to Woodruff, as you see today in the Guns preventing killings in Norway thread.
Your point is pointless
IT DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE YOU OBVIOUSLY MIS READ THE REPORT YOU POSTED! That is why you could not find it again! And.. I DID find not just one source, but multiple sources, including several with titles of "free rehab clinics in Florida", which is what made me think I found the link you saught.. and the clinics listed were mostly not for drugs.
And yet... despite my giving you contrary data, you keep insisting that you are correct and everyone else is wrong. That is the definition of poor integrity.
jgordon1111 wrote:woodruff never saw your rank in the forum.didnt know you had made it public.guessed that you were military in the way you state your points.
Phatscotty wrote:Alright, so lets go with that. Despite what I said and what you said, lets talk about how it is.
Can I understand that your whole point is there are less rehab options than one of my many posts supposes? Okay, so.....what do we need to do about this? Why is this our problem and not the drug users problem? I say no to drugs all the time because I don't think they are a smart thing to do. That's on me. Why in the world is a group of people who say yes to drugs and get bent on them and abuse the welfare system even more my problem than welfare in the first place is?
It sounds like you are saying there are many levels of help that the bottom luckers of society needs, at an ever increases size and scope. I sound like I am saying they need a little self help, and that's the most important aspect of what the title of this thread will provide to many people who's lives and families are destroyed by drug abuse.
Easy money is spent easily, and as far as escaping problems when one has many, it does not get any easier than drugs.
jgordon1111 wrote:lol woodruff i would say compliment. others may not think so but i do.know the style well.
Phatscotty wrote:There was a company's website I copy pasted. It was 2/3 private and 1/3 gov't and offered free rehab to people who made under 16k and it said it had offices in virtually every country in Florida. I clicked on the location finder, and a list of 50 or so counties came up, I also listed the website and the name of the company.
It's not absurd at all. I mean, looking around in my state, and realizing it's different from Florida, but there are free clinics everywhere around here, and people can access them from the state insurance program we have here that costs 4$/month. Just saying, what you call "absurd" is pretty f'n normal here.
Are you trying to say there are zero clinics, or very few in Florida? What's your point
jgordon1111 wrote:radiojake. if you are offended be that way toward those who refuse to help themselves you missed my point in the topic of those 2 instances 1st my sister in law decided a half day into work that it wasnt for her and welfare was easier. 2nd the lady with the scratch tickets made it very clear where her desires were,when she told me her children would be on welfare too. these are the people i am talking about the ones who choose to be in the system and have no desire of helping themselves and then teach their children that it is better than getting a job. i am not talking about the people who by no design of their own have to swallow their pride and accept assistance. i will in the future endeavor to be more clear on my statements
Rx for Danger: Number of Florida babies born addicted to drugs skyrockets
The number of newborns treated for drug-withdrawal syndrome at Florida hospitals increased 42% in 2010.
July 31, 2011|By Amy Pavuk, Orlando Sentinel
The number of babies treated at Florida hospitals for drug-withdrawal syndrome continued to skyrocket last year, further evidence of the far-reaching impact of the state's prescription-drug epidemic.
In 2010, 1,374 babies were born addicted to drugs because their mothers were users ā a 42 percent increase from the year prior, according to new Agency for Health Care Administration records obtained by the Orlando Sentinel.
Phatscotty wrote:Rx for Danger: Number of Florida babies born addicted to drugs skyrockets
The number of newborns treated for drug-withdrawal syndrome at Florida hospitals increased 42% in 2010.
July 31, 2011|By Amy Pavuk, Orlando Sentinel
The number of babies treated at Florida hospitals for drug-withdrawal syndrome continued to skyrocket last year, further evidence of the far-reaching impact of the state's prescription-drug epidemic.
In 2010, 1,374 babies were born addicted to drugs because their mothers were users ā a 42 percent increase from the year prior, according to new Agency for Health Care Administration records obtained by the Orlando Sentinel.
Florida needs to get serious about drug abuse.
No, because.. again, most people on drugs are not on welfare and most people on welfare are not on drugs.Phatscotty wrote:That's just the thing though. It will stop drug abuse, because that's the only way you can get welfare.
Phatscotty wrote:Trust me, they will quit, and their lives and their families will be far better off (both of which you don't care about at all).
Phatscotty wrote:Tough Love, One Love
Phatscotty wrote:That's just the thing though. It will stop drug abuse, because that's the only way you can get welfare. Trust me, they will quit, and their lives and their families will be far better off (both of which you don't care about at all).
Tough Love, One Love
Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's just the thing though. It will stop drug abuse, because that's the only way you can get welfare. Trust me, they will quit, and their lives and their families will be far better off (both of which you don't care about at all).
Tough Love, One Love
You are a god. And strangely you seem to be very proud of that fact.
Phatscotty wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:That's just the thing though. It will stop drug abuse, because that's the only way you can get welfare. Trust me, they will quit, and their lives and their families will be far better off (both of which you don't care about at all).
Tough Love, One Love
You are a god. And strangely you seem to be very proud of that fact.
It's like people who have a heart attack scare, and immediately quit smoking because the side effects are for real now.
Likewise welfare drug abusers all throughout Florida have felt that all too real jolt shoot up their spines and realize that they now have a deadline on when to quit using drugs, otherwise there won't be a free handout for them.
It is time for them to get their shit together and realize they are stealing and abusing the system and just because certain whackos stand behind them and allow them to keep abusing doesnt make it right.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
spurgistan wrote:Preliminary results show 2% of welfare recipients fail a drug test.
According to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, performed by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, 8.7 percent of the population nationally over age 12 uses illicit drugs. The rate was 6.3 percent for those ages 26 and up.
Oops. I suppose we'll be hearing an apology from Rick Scott soon for wasting Floridians money, as well as wrongly insulting the poor of his state, who really have it hard enough.
jimboston wrote:spurgistan wrote:Preliminary results show 2% of welfare recipients fail a drug test.
According to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, performed by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, 8.7 percent of the population nationally over age 12 uses illicit drugs. The rate was 6.3 percent for those ages 26 and up.
Oops. I suppose we'll be hearing an apology from Rick Scott soon for wasting Floridians money, as well as wrongly insulting the poor of his state, who really have it hard enough.
Maybe this just proves that the 'professional' dug abusers (who also collect welfare) know how to beat the system?
PLAYER57832 wrote:jimboston wrote:spurgistan wrote:Preliminary results show 2% of welfare recipients fail a drug test.
According to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, performed by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, 8.7 percent of the population nationally over age 12 uses illicit drugs. The rate was 6.3 percent for those ages 26 and up.
Oops. I suppose we'll be hearing an apology from Rick Scott soon for wasting Floridians money, as well as wrongly insulting the poor of his state, who really have it hard enough.
Maybe this just proves that the 'professional' dug abusers (who also collect welfare) know how to beat the system?
NO. In fact, if anything, the rate among those on welfare is much LOWER, not higher. I posted the data on that a long time ago. You ignored it then, though, so I see no reason why posting it again will help anything.
jimboston wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:jimboston wrote:spurgistan wrote:Preliminary results show 2% of welfare recipients fail a drug test.
According to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, performed by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, 8.7 percent of the population nationally over age 12 uses illicit drugs. The rate was 6.3 percent for those ages 26 and up.
Oops. I suppose we'll be hearing an apology from Rick Scott soon for wasting Floridians money, as well as wrongly insulting the poor of his state, who really have it hard enough.
Maybe this just proves that the 'professional' dug abusers (who also collect welfare) know how to beat the system?
NO. In fact, if anything, the rate among those on welfare is much LOWER, not higher. I posted the data on that a long time ago. You ignored it then, though, so I see no reason why posting it again will help anything.
This "fact" does not match my real world experience working with the Boston Housing Authority.
Liberals are just as good at manipulating statistics as anyone.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Phatscotty wrote:Spurgistan. How much money is a lot? Which company did Scott make a boatload of money on?
Drug abuse causes problems. Drug abuse is the reason why many people end up living off of other people. They get addicted, lose their job, get kicked out of their home/evicted, they burnt the bridges that might have let them stay with their family or friends, so then it becomes everyone's problem. With the exception of the mentally ill, people do not end up sleeping under bridges because they can't find a job. They sleep under bridges because alcohol or drugs prevent them from keeping a job
Your BS stats do not match anything real world I have personally experienced in Minnesota or New York for that matter, or any of my friends situations.
Neighborhoods that get the most welfare checks are the same neighborhoods where you can buy your drugs on any corner in broad daylight.
You guys are fooling anyone, and this program will help drug addicts more than any $300 check ever will.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee