Moderator: Community Team

























Night Strike wrote:Dang, your title got my hopes up.






























Frigidus wrote:You don't need to consult someone to see if a criminal gets a trial by jury.























































3
2
2
2
Phatscotty wrote:Frigidus wrote:You don't need to consult someone to see if a criminal gets a trial by jury.
yup, someone tries to blow up an airplane. no need to communicate with intelligence experts or defense personnel. No need to "work together". I thought "working togheter" was you guys answer on how to handle this issue ALL THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CHRISTMAS BOMBER THREAD!?





saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE




















Frigidus wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Frigidus wrote:You don't need to consult someone to see if a criminal gets a trial by jury.
yup, someone tries to blow up an airplane. no need to communicate with intelligence experts or defense personnel. No need to "work together". I thought "working togheter" was you guys answer on how to handle this issue ALL THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CHRISTMAS BOMBER THREAD!?
He's not trying to blow up a plane now. Once someone is in the legal system we have a framework that we follow. You wanting to indefinitely imprison someone without a trial for their motive is disturbing (not to say that indefinitely imprisoning someone without a trial for committing a crime isn't any more disturbing).

























rockfist wrote:If I were any member of the administration or the Democrat party I would resign. They have recklessly placed our economy in a precarious position for their own political gain rather than doing anything for the good of the country. They should be embarassed and ashamed of their behavior.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.










spurgistan wrote:Yes. He should be replaced with Alberto Gonzalez. Man, he was good.




















thegreekdog wrote:spurgistan wrote:Yes. He should be replaced with Alberto Gonzalez. Man, he was good.
Reported for being anti-Hispanic. .
SultanOfSurreal wrote:thegreekdog wrote:spurgistan wrote:Yes. He should be replaced with Alberto Gonzalez. Man, he was good.
Reported for being anti-Hispanic. .
so is this gonna be your new thing for this week





































BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.





BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.

























BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.

























Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.
I decided I couldn't present such a farce in an unbiased way (modus operandi) so I decided either people know what's going on or they don't. hence the third option
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










thegreekdog wrote:SultanOfSurreal wrote:thegreekdog wrote:spurgistan wrote:Yes. He should be replaced with Alberto Gonzalez. Man, he was good.
Reported for being anti-Hispanic. .
so is this gonna be your new thing for this week
No... just for that particular post.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.
I decided I couldn't present such a farce in an unbiased way (modus operandi) so I decided either people know what's going on or they don't. hence the third option
I guess Frig summed it up rather nicely then.
Why the fuck should someone resign over standard procedure for prosecuting criminals?
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE




















Serbia wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.
I decided I couldn't present such a farce in an unbiased way (modus operandi) so I decided either people know what's going on or they don't. hence the third option
I guess Frig summed it up rather nicely then.
Why the fuck should someone resign over standard procedure for prosecuting criminals?
Because it wasn't a criminal act, it was an act of war committed by a foreigner (non-American). People like that do not deserve to have the same rights as American citizens. It flies contrary to history and logic. That's why. Step back from your morally superior pedestal and try to consider the ramifications of this precedent.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










Serbia wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.
I decided I couldn't present such a farce in an unbiased way (modus operandi) so I decided either people know what's going on or they don't. hence the third option
I guess Frig summed it up rather nicely then.
Why the fuck should someone resign over standard procedure for prosecuting criminals?
Because it wasn't a criminal act, it was an act of war committed by a foreigner (non-American). People like that do not deserve to have the same rights as American citizens. It flies contrary to history and logic. That's why. Step back from your morally superior pedestal and try to consider the ramifications of this precedent.

























MeDeFe wrote:Serbia wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Um, what's the background story here?
I know I can google it, but I may not find exactly what you guys are on about.
I decided I couldn't present such a farce in an unbiased way (modus operandi) so I decided either people know what's going on or they don't. hence the third option
I guess Frig summed it up rather nicely then.
Why the fuck should someone resign over standard procedure for prosecuting criminals?
Because it wasn't a criminal act, it was an act of war committed by a foreigner (non-American). People like that do not deserve to have the same rights as American citizens. It flies contrary to history and logic. That's why. Step back from your morally superior pedestal and try to consider the ramifications of this precedent.
The ramifications for the USA of prosecuting attempted mass murder as a crime would be, let's see...
Ah, right: upholding the democracy, liberty and human rights they are trying to spread all over the world.

























saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap