Moderator: Community Team
notyou2 wrote:Is it true that they use the leftovers to make calamari?
Woodruff wrote:I'm fairly ignorant on the issue, to be honest. As I understand things, there may be some cleanliness issues with not circumcising? Other than that, I don't suppose it really helps anything...
bedub1 wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm fairly ignorant on the issue, to be honest. As I understand things, there may be some cleanliness issues with not circumcising? Other than that, I don't suppose it really helps anything...
The cleanliness was a factor 2000 years ago before running water and soap. Now days guys can be counted on to clean their penis's.
Woodruff wrote:bedub1 wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm fairly ignorant on the issue, to be honest. As I understand things, there may be some cleanliness issues with not circumcising? Other than that, I don't suppose it really helps anything...
The cleanliness was a factor 2000 years ago before running water and soap. Now days guys can be counted on to clean their penis's.
You say that...and yet, I've seen some students who...well...if nothing else is clean, why would that be?
Woodruff wrote:bedub1 wrote:Woodruff wrote:I'm fairly ignorant on the issue, to be honest. As I understand things, there may be some cleanliness issues with not circumcising? Other than that, I don't suppose it really helps anything...
The cleanliness was a factor 2000 years ago before running water and soap. Now days guys can be counted on to clean their penis's.
You say that...and yet, I've seen some students who...well...if nothing else is clean, why would that be?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:The studies I've seen that indicated any hygienic benefit included the entirety of Africa, where running water and soap are in very short supply in many parts. Ongoing wars and several hundred years of economic exploitation can have that effect. Addressing those issues will do a lot more good than cutting off people's foreskins.
MeDeFe wrote:Religious freedom does not mean you get to decide what religious rites someone else has to go through.
MeDeFe wrote:With my own rant out of the way I leave you with Penn & Teller's Bullshit episode on circumcision. This episode includes some very graphic images. Newborns having their foreskins cut off, going into neurogenic shock, and a penis with a reconstructed foreskin.
You have been warned.
Ray Rider wrote:It's cleaner and healthier so if you want it or you want it for your little boys, more power to ya!
Haggis_McMutton wrote:MeDeFe wrote:
They should make that episode about Jungian philosophy that they mentioned at the begining.
Also, nice to see you posting more again.
BigBallinStalin wrote:in another 100 years, people will look at us and say, "wow, what a bunch of dicks."
Ray Rider wrote:It's cleaner and healthier
vodean wrote:much reduced chance of getting or carrying STDs
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Ray Rider wrote:It's cleaner and healthier
Show me the study that hasn't been debunked yet. Water and soap are far more effective.
natty dread wrote:Also, the whole argument of "circumcision for keeping the penis clean" is stupid.
Chopping off foreskins because it makes cleaning the penis easier is the same as chopping off your toes in order to make cleaning your feet easier.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: pmac666