Conquer Club

Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GabonX on Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:30 pm

Fuckin rite!

Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Can Be Recharged By Lasers

LOS ANGELES (KNX 1070) — A recently demonstrated breakthrough in technology may help Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), better known as drones, stay airborne for very long periods of time before having to return to Earth.

This development comes at a time when the U.S. government is actively encouraging the domestic use of drones, first by law enforcement, and later, by private concerns.

Lockheed Martin and a company called LaserMotive have been able to keep a drone flying for some 49 hours non-stop, using a ground-based laser to recharge the drone’s on board battery, says Tom Koonce, the project manager for Lockheed Martin, in an interview with KNX1070 Newsradio.

The test, says Koonce, was conducted in a wind tunnel in Palmdale. The system will very soon be tested in actual airspace in the desert, requiring coordination with both the FAA and NASA to keep the ground-based laser from interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles.

“Maybe it’s police, maybe it’s fire, maybe it’s emergency services. If they need to be up overhead for a long period of time, that makes a lot of sense to put a system like this in place,” says Koonce, who also told KNX1070′s Charles Feldman that “it aligns very well with the president’s directive to the FAA to prepare unmanned aerial systems into the national airspace to integrate them seamlessly by 2015.”

Download: endless-drone-seg-web2.mp3

And, when the airborne drone senses it is low on “fuel,” its internal GPS would automatically guide it back to circle the ground-based laser system in order to get a re-charge.

How long could a drone be kept in the air using this laser recharging system? Koonce says, in theory, indefinitely.

Most people think of drones as weapons used to combat terrorists in far off places, but that is likely to soon change now that the FAA has streamlined the application process for law enforcement agencies in the U.S. to fly drones.

As previously reported by KNX1070 in our series “The Age of Drones,” both the LAPD and the Los Angeles County Sheriff have been looking into buying drones but neither agency has yet to actually purchase one, they say.

The notion of drones flying around snapping pictures of people below has raised the concern of critics who worry that the devices might be abused by police agencies and usher in a new age of aerial Big Brother. The idea of drones that may be kept flying for indefinite periods of time will likely fuel that concern.

Yet, as Koonce points out, being able to keep a drone airborne for a protracted period has its advantages for such things as sporting events and political conventions.


http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/07/ ... by-lasers/
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:35 pm

Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GabonX on Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:15 pm

Puh-leeease don't make my killer thread about laser drones boring with your economic and bureaucratic rationale!
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby natty dread on Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:33 pm

How many innocent civilians will be slaughtered with these new drones?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Army of GOD on Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:03 am

fucking skynet
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Johnny Rockets on Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:16 am

natty dread wrote:How many innocent civilians will be slaughtered with these new drones?



Answer: All of them.

Just another incentive to not be an innocent sheep.


jRock
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Johnny Rockets
 
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby vodean on Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:46 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"
well its not which is cheaper but rather which is more effective. for good reasons that usually makes it more expensive, but we dont buy things BECAUSE they are expensive.
Image
<NoSurvivors› then vote chuck for being an info whore
User avatar
Sergeant vodean
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:37 pm

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:05 pm

vodean wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"
well its not which is cheaper but rather which is more effective. for good reasons that usually makes it more expensive, but we dont buy things BECAUSE they are expensive.



Image
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:06 pm

GabonX wrote:Puh-leeease don't make my killer thread about laser drones boring with your economic and bureaucratic rationale!



In other words:


GabonX wrote:Damnit, I want more state-funded fireworks! Who cares about the consequences! GIMME GIMME GIMME!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Baron Von PWN on Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:50 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"


Except they've developed a way to remotely power something. They're developing wireless power delivery. The potential there is pretty enormous, sounds like a worthwhile technology to develop.

Imagine electric commercial aircraft that could be powered mid flight. Obviously this technology is young and requires allot of safety measures until it's more fully understood or refined, however it seems to be a worthwhile one to pursue.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby natty dread on Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:16 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:Imagine electric commercial aircraft that could be powered mid flight


from SPACE
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:27 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"


Except they've developed a way to remotely power something. They're developing wireless power delivery. The potential there is pretty enormous, sounds like a worthwhile technology to develop.

Imagine electric commercial aircraft that could be powered mid flight. Obviously this technology is young and requires allot of safety measures until it's more fully understood or refined, however it seems to be a worthwhile one to pursue.


Sure, it's a great technology--if and only if it's removed from the clutches of the military and public police. The private sector is much more sensitive to customer preferences and prices relative to public police/military, so I've no problem with those guys playing around with this. However, the military/police really don't need this technology. It's just another way of unnecessarily expanding their budgets for very little marginal benefit (to the public).
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby vodean on Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:43 pm

it is in the public's interest in that it will reduce military oil consumption, increasing supply, lowering prices.
Image
<NoSurvivors› then vote chuck for being an info whore
User avatar
Sergeant vodean
 
Posts: 948
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:37 pm

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Campin_Killer on Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:48 pm

Three words:

Strategic Defense Initiative
Upcoming Tournaments
NCAA Football
In the Trenches - 3 in sign-ups
13 Colonies
8 Thoughts
Africa

Highscore
Image

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Campin_Killer
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:47 pm

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GabonX on Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:23 pm

vodean wrote:it is in the public's interest in that it will reduce military oil consumption, increasing supply, lowering prices.


Pretty much... Things like this, I imagine, can probably be powered by nuclear plants thereby lowering oil consumption.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:34 pm

vodean wrote:it is in the public's interest in that it will reduce military oil consumption, increasing supply, lowering prices.


Sure, if you forget that people pay taxes to support this unnecessary crap for the military. So much for the cost-savings argument.

Besides, either they purchase, move, and power a laser, or they could use two drones while charging the other's battery. Or better yet, not even use the drones where they aren't even needed. And, still, we're talking about drones here. It's not like the military is reducing 10% of its oil consumption for all its mechanized divisions. What lower prices? There would be none.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GabonX on Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:42 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
vodean wrote:it is in the public's interest in that it will reduce military oil consumption, increasing supply, lowering prices.


Sure, if you forget that people pay taxes to support this unnecessary crap for the military. So much for the cost-savings argument.

Besides, either they purchase, move, and power a laser, or they could use two drones while charging the other's battery. Or better yet, not even use the drones where they aren't even needed. And, still, we're talking about drones here. It's not like the military is reducing 10% of its oil consumption for all its mechanized divisions. What lower prices? There would be none.

That's just not how the world works bud.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GreecePwns on Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:55 pm

The logiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic! It buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurns!
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.

Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Corporal GreecePwns
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Army of GOD on Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:39 pm

that's two things in this house that won't work
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby BigBallinStalin on Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:17 pm

GreecePwns wrote:The logiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiic! It buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurns!


Just seeing if GabonX improved his brain lately. All indicators point to: "not much." I'm concerned that the playerian disease is more powerful than commonly understood. In a matter of weeks, first we'll be outright rejecting anyone's claims without reason--only a pithy sentence. Then, we'll be posting huge paragraphs about salmon and how they require government subsidies to swim upstream faster because the market has failed them--never mind that the topic was "how was your day?"




Image
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GreecePwns on Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:35 pm

Yo guys, my dick just got limp from your lack of a logical response.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.

Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Corporal GreecePwns
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby GreecePwns on Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:43 pm

It is quite clear that the Pig Obama and his army of factory-schools have lobotomized and devoured your brain, removing all semblance of logic. You have become a droning mouthpiece of the State, banging the drum of imperialism at every turn.

    This is the part where I don't troll. See that indentation? That means that this is the part that is irrefutable. [url="some really obscure indy-journalist site"]
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.

Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Corporal GreecePwns
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby Baron Von PWN on Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:35 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Baron Von PWN wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Which is cheaper:

buying two drones and flying one at a time while the other recharges?

Or, buying one drone and coordinating with the FAA and NASA in order to shoot a laser to recharge the drone at the risk of "interfering with either commercial aircraft or Earth-orbiting space vehicles" and other unintended consequences from which the government may legally excuse themselves.


???


"Oh, BBS! It's not about the costs. Cost-reduction is a killer for bureaucracies, so of course the more expensive method should be pursued!"


Except they've developed a way to remotely power something. They're developing wireless power delivery. The potential there is pretty enormous, sounds like a worthwhile technology to develop.

Imagine electric commercial aircraft that could be powered mid flight. Obviously this technology is young and requires allot of safety measures until it's more fully understood or refined, however it seems to be a worthwhile one to pursue.


Sure, it's a great technology--if and only if it's removed from the clutches of the military and public police. The private sector is much more sensitive to customer preferences and prices relative to public police/military, so I've no problem with those guys playing around with this. However, the military/police really don't need this technology. It's just another way of unnecessarily expanding their budgets for very little marginal benefit (to the public).


We'll never defeat eurasia with that kind of attitude!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: Drones That May Fly ‘Indefinitely’ Powered By Laser

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:44 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:We'll never defeat eurasia with that kind of attitude!


'Change places!' shouted the Mad Hatter. Let's switch our focus to Eastasia.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users