Moderator: Community Team
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:the welfare queen racist stereotype
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Neoteny wrote:the welfare queen racist stereotype
fun fact: women of ALL races can have large amounts of children
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote: ignorant hicks like the OP
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
Feel free to mail her a check.
thegreekdog wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
Feel free to mail her a check.
Why would he send his own money when he can vote for people to force you to send your money? It's a win-win for him. He will be seen as supporting poor working mothers and will be seen as punishing those that, for unknown, but unfair, reasons, make more money than poor working mothers.
betiko wrote:you guys would turn batshit crazy with all the wellfare abuse in france. We got lots of polygamic arabic familly without even a french making shit tons of money from wellfare. The other day a taxi driver told me he took an old unemployed arab guy all pissed off because he still didn't receive his 18 000⬠paycheck for 2 month (he had like 12 kids) because IT WAS HIS RIGHT AS IF HE EARNED IT. Then these kids aren't even taken care of and do all type of crap as no one is looking for them. Freakin 9000⬠a month wellfare!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
BigBallinStalin wrote:thegreekdog wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
Feel free to mail her a check.
Why would he send his own money when he can vote for people to force you to send your money? It's a win-win for him. He will be seen as supporting poor working mothers and will be seen as punishing those that, for unknown, but unfair, reasons, make more money than poor working mothers.
Because supporting the state coercion and its theft of other people's wealth is more humane and self-satisfying?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:You are all racist hicks.BigBallinStalin wrote:thegreekdog wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
Feel free to mail her a check.
Why would he send his own money when he can vote for people to force you to send your money? It's a win-win for him. He will be seen as supporting poor working mothers and will be seen as punishing those that, for unknown, but unfair, reasons, make more money than poor working mothers.
Because supporting the state coercion and its theft of other people's wealth is more humane and self-satisfying?
I don't think these comments are fair. There's clearly something wrong with having this many children. The fact of the matter is they will have to be supported somehow (and will always be unless we somehow limit this sort of activity [having kids, as in; whatever her reasons, she really needs to stop]), and I don't trust the magical libertarian solution of relying on racist hicks to contribute willingly. If it were in my means, I would happily donate to those children, and, if you looked at any other context to this story, people have been donating food an other supplies to the family. To be honest, many of the donors are probably not in great positions to give either.
So, your smartass comments are neither smart, nor ass enough for my tastes.
jay_a2j wrote:WARNING- CAN MAKE YOU NAUSEOUS
Army of GOD wrote:if we do get Anne Hathaway for that role can we get a topless scene Symmetry?
Symmetry wrote:Army of GOD wrote:if we do get Anne Hathaway for that role can we get a topless scene Symmetry?
We're thinking of making her a stripper in the movie, early readings of the script consider the move to be "brave" as long as we choose a white actress.
thegreekdog wrote:Neoteny wrote:You are all racist hicks.BigBallinStalin wrote:thegreekdog wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:I guess, just in case anyone wants an actual semblance of context on this, here's a link to the local news website.
http://www.wfla.com/story/20451514/ange ... ldren-back
I'm not going to deny that any person with more than, say, five kids (or even fewer, really) is anything other than deranged in the worst possible sense, but the fact that she was upset about a housing dispute and was demanding that "someone" pay for the more immediate circumstance of living in a motel room with a dozen other people after being evicted makes it a little less sickening than the welfare queen racist stereotype that is portrayed via tactics of outright lying by ignorant hicks like the OP. I don't have much sympathy for her, but I have trouble stooping so low.
Feel free to mail her a check.
Why would he send his own money when he can vote for people to force you to send your money? It's a win-win for him. He will be seen as supporting poor working mothers and will be seen as punishing those that, for unknown, but unfair, reasons, make more money than poor working mothers.
Because supporting the state coercion and its theft of other people's wealth is more humane and self-satisfying?
I don't think these comments are fair. There's clearly something wrong with having this many children. The fact of the matter is they will have to be supported somehow (and will always be unless we somehow limit this sort of activity [having kids, as in; whatever her reasons, she really needs to stop]), and I don't trust the magical libertarian solution of relying on racist hicks to contribute willingly. If it were in my means, I would happily donate to those children, and, if you looked at any other context to this story, people have been donating food an other supplies to the family. To be honest, many of the donors are probably not in great positions to give either.
So, your smartass comments are neither smart, nor ass enough for my tastes.
I contemplated typing "No offense Neoteny" after my post and then realized it would be like that Dom Irerra joke - (to paraphrase) - "You are a smelly piece of shit, no offense." But yeah, it wasn't directed at you so much as directed at people who vociferously support these types of measures. I think I've made it pretty clear that I'm more concerned with "rich entitlement spending" than I am with welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, or social security. I can't speak for BBS though.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
bedub1 wrote:AAFitz wrote:jay_a2j wrote:WARNING- CAN MAKE YOU NAUSEOUS
Ok, so, she didnt get abortions. There are 15 children alive now that need to be cared for. After congratulating her on what had to be a difficult decision to have the children, what do you suggest?
I suggest we should cut pay for those who work for the government to pay for them. They get paid way too much given they are just a burden on society, and more funds would be available for taking care of children, which would help reduce the rate of abortions.
Every time I here a government worker complaining about welfare it makes me sick, because government jobs are welfare for those that cant do actually productive jobs. All you freeloaders should be cast into the wind and earn money in a real job like the rest of us.
I suggest the 3 fathers and 1 mother take care of the 15 children. That's a 4 to 15 ratio, which is approximately a 4 to 16 ratio, which is a 1 to 4 ratio. So each adult needs to earn enough and be responsible for 4 children. If they need food assistance, it should be MRE's. If they need housing, it should be military-style Barracks. They should all be required to work in order to receive ANY assistance. Failure to work and provide for these children should be means for imprisonment for child endangerment and abandonment. They should not receive ANY money from the government as a form of assistance, only food/shelter etc.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users