Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Don't worry. You're well on your way, DY.... hah
AndyDufresne wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Don't worry. You're well on your way, DY.... hah
--Andy
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Gillipig wrote:I'd actually be positively surprised if there was a hell. Here I am thinking I won't be concious after I'm dead, but then I find out there's this place where I'll be concious, only twist is that Adolph Hitler will be continously chopping off my testicles and Genghis Khan will chop of my head.....things could be better I suppose but it's still better than I envisioned.
Or maybe hell is like being constipated for eternity......No wait, if hell is supposed to be the worst possible place, then surely I must first of all be on fire, then I imagine all my bowels must've been ripped out and/or mutilated, my eyes must've been poked out, my skin would probably have been peeled off with a potato peeler, all my bones would surely be broken and there's probably not much left of my testicles. My question is then, will I feel it when Genghis Khan has sex with my eardrums? If I don't it can't be the worst possible place, thus, I'm not in hell.... Am I then in heaven perhaps? Maybe that's what heaven is, maybe since everything is relative, not feeling Genghis Khan fucking your eardrums is like heaven compared to feeling it. Things just got deep guys.
notyou2 wrote:Gillipig wrote:I'd actually be positively surprised if there was a hell. Here I am thinking I won't be concious after I'm dead, but then I find out there's this place where I'll be concious, only twist is that Adolph Hitler will be continously chopping off my testicles and Genghis Khan will chop of my head.....things could be better I suppose but it's still better than I envisioned.
Or maybe hell is like being constipated for eternity......No wait, if hell is supposed to be the worst possible place, then surely I must first of all be on fire, then I imagine all my bowels must've been ripped out and/or mutilated, my eyes must've been poked out, my skin would probably have been peeled off with a potato peeler, all my bones would surely be broken and there's probably not much left of my testicles. My question is then, will I feel it when Genghis Khan has sex with my eardrums? If I don't it can't be the worst possible place, thus, I'm not in hell.... Am I then in heaven perhaps? Maybe that's what heaven is, maybe since everything is relative, not feeling Genghis Khan fucking your eardrums is like heaven compared to feeling it. Things just got deep guys.
Is it an Ikea potato peeler that never worked right?
Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:Gillipig wrote:I'd actually be positively surprised if there was a hell. Here I am thinking I won't be concious after I'm dead, but then I find out there's this place where I'll be concious, only twist is that Adolph Hitler will be continously chopping off my testicles and Genghis Khan will chop of my head.....things could be better I suppose but it's still better than I envisioned.
Or maybe hell is like being constipated for eternity......No wait, if hell is supposed to be the worst possible place, then surely I must first of all be on fire, then I imagine all my bowels must've been ripped out and/or mutilated, my eyes must've been poked out, my skin would probably have been peeled off with a potato peeler, all my bones would surely be broken and there's probably not much left of my testicles. My question is then, will I feel it when Genghis Khan has sex with my eardrums? If I don't it can't be the worst possible place, thus, I'm not in hell.... Am I then in heaven perhaps? Maybe that's what heaven is, maybe since everything is relative, not feeling Genghis Khan fucking your eardrums is like heaven compared to feeling it. Things just got deep guys.
Is it an Ikea potato peeler that never worked right?
Are there any working potato peelers? I have not found any, at least you can count on IKEA makig it cheap.
I'm surprised they haven't made a potato peeler that you'll have to put together yourself yet, maybe that's the next new thing, heh.
notyou2 wrote:Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:Gillipig wrote:I'd actually be positively surprised if there was a hell. Here I am thinking I won't be concious after I'm dead, but then I find out there's this place where I'll be concious, only twist is that Adolph Hitler will be continously chopping off my testicles and Genghis Khan will chop of my head.....things could be better I suppose but it's still better than I envisioned.
Or maybe hell is like being constipated for eternity......No wait, if hell is supposed to be the worst possible place, then surely I must first of all be on fire, then I imagine all my bowels must've been ripped out and/or mutilated, my eyes must've been poked out, my skin would probably have been peeled off with a potato peeler, all my bones would surely be broken and there's probably not much left of my testicles. My question is then, will I feel it when Genghis Khan has sex with my eardrums? If I don't it can't be the worst possible place, thus, I'm not in hell.... Am I then in heaven perhaps? Maybe that's what heaven is, maybe since everything is relative, not feeling Genghis Khan fucking your eardrums is like heaven compared to feeling it. Things just got deep guys.
Is it an Ikea potato peeler that never worked right?
Are there any working potato peelers? I have not found any, at least you can count on IKEA makig it cheap.
I'm surprised they haven't made a potato peeler that you'll have to put together yourself yet, maybe that's the next new thing, heh.
I have a couple of potato peelers that work great. Pretty sure they aren't from IKEA.
On a related issue. Why does IKEA use all capitals? Is it a Swedish thing?
oVo wrote:I've never believed such a place as Hell existed,
then realized some people are living in it.
notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
notyou2 wrote:notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ikea-monkey-mom-ordered-to-pay-83k-in-legal-costs-to-sanctuary-1.2501250
Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ikea-monkey-mom-ordered-to-pay-83k-in-legal-costs-to-sanctuary-1.2501250
I understood everything about the verdict except the part where they said she somehow owed them $83,000 just because she lost the trial. What the f*ck? She'd get away easier if she killed the monkey! How is that even remotely justified? They were so offended by being sued they all shit their pants worth a total $83,000? I see no other explanation.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ikea-monkey-mom-ordered-to-pay-83k-in-legal-costs-to-sanctuary-1.2501250
I understood everything about the verdict except the part where they said she somehow owed them $83,000 just because she lost the trial. What the f*ck? She'd get away easier if she killed the monkey! How is that even remotely justified? They were so offended by being sued they all shit their pants worth a total $83,000? I see no other explanation.
Some of $83k covers the Monkey Sanctuary's legal outlays. The other is to punish the 'monkey mom' for suing the Monkey Sanctuary, which acquired the stolen monkey. The law probably favored the Sanctuary because of some clause about wild animals, but how 'wild' was her monkey? I dunno. The ruling seems unjust though. A government agency picks up her monkey (okay) then gives the stolen animal to the Sanctuary (not okay). The Sanctuary return its stolen property (not okay).
Phatscotty wrote:See You in Hell
Gillipig wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ikea-monkey-mom-ordered-to-pay-83k-in-legal-costs-to-sanctuary-1.2501250
I understood everything about the verdict except the part where they said she somehow owed them $83,000 just because she lost the trial. What the f*ck? She'd get away easier if she killed the monkey! How is that even remotely justified? They were so offended by being sued they all shit their pants worth a total $83,000? I see no other explanation.
Some of $83k covers the Monkey Sanctuary's legal outlays. The other is to punish the 'monkey mom' for suing the Monkey Sanctuary, which acquired the stolen monkey. The law probably favored the Sanctuary because of some clause about wild animals, but how 'wild' was her monkey? I dunno. The ruling seems unjust though. A government agency picks up her monkey (okay) then gives the stolen animal to the Sanctuary (not okay). The Sanctuary return its stolen property (not okay).
Covering legal outlays is okay but the notion of punishing her for sueing them when they practically stole her monkey is pretty outrageous. Are we all supposed to take for given that when our pet gets lost and we find it in someone elses possesion it's automatically "theirs" now? I can understand they decided that the sanctuary should keep the monkey but it's by no means a clear cut case, and punishing her for having the temerity of pressing her rights is just ridiculous.
Dukasaur wrote:Phatscotty wrote:See You in Hell
What does that have to do with her monkey? Do try not to derail threads all the time.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Gillipig wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Gillipig wrote:notyou2 wrote:notyou2 wrote:The store isn't necessarily hell, but the parking lot is, especially if you are a monkey in a winter coat.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ikea-monkey-mom-ordered-to-pay-83k-in-legal-costs-to-sanctuary-1.2501250
I understood everything about the verdict except the part where they said she somehow owed them $83,000 just because she lost the trial. What the f*ck? She'd get away easier if she killed the monkey! How is that even remotely justified? They were so offended by being sued they all shit their pants worth a total $83,000? I see no other explanation.
Some of $83k covers the Monkey Sanctuary's legal outlays. The other is to punish the 'monkey mom' for suing the Monkey Sanctuary, which acquired the stolen monkey. The law probably favored the Sanctuary because of some clause about wild animals, but how 'wild' was her monkey? I dunno. The ruling seems unjust though. A government agency picks up her monkey (okay) then gives the stolen animal to the Sanctuary (not okay). The Sanctuary return its stolen property (not okay).
Covering legal outlays is okay but the notion of punishing her for sueing them when they practically stole her monkey is pretty outrageous. Are we all supposed to take for given that when our pet gets lost and we find it in someone elses possesion it's automatically "theirs" now? I can understand they decided that the sanctuary should keep the monkey but it's by no means a clear cut case, and punishing her for having the temerity of pressing her rights is just ridiculous.
I agree. It only discourages people from pressing claims against state organizations--or organizations which serve a 'public good'. Punitive damages is a well-intended idea (i.e. charging people extra for frivolous claims), but from what I know, her claim isn't frivolous. It's a disgusting ruling.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: denominator, jonesthecurl, mookiemcgee