Symmetry wrote:It's a pretty thorough article, although that's not really its main thrust. Depressing though, isn't it? College in the US isn't even all that tough. Plenty of courses give you marks for attendance.
Depends on where you're talking about. Lower-to-mid tier U.S. universities are probably inferior to their British counterparts. Taking an undergraduate chemistry module at Arizona State is probably easier than taking the same module at Lancaster.
At the elite level, however you can't compare a Russell Group school against an Ivy League (or equivalent) institution. Except for Oxbridge they're simply outclassed. And even then it's a comparison between a smart pauper (Cantab) and a smart tycoon (Harvard); they just don't have the resources to do much more than keep up.
The
QS rankings are inherently flawed, but for purposes of comparison here's their Top 10 UK and US universities. Comparing Yale to the University of Manchester, or Cornell to Bristol University or Penn to Warwick just doesn't pass the smell test. How many people outside Britain have even heard of Bristol University? Meanwhile, how many people outside the U.S. have heard of Cornell?
1. MIT | Cambridge
2. Harvard | Oxford
3. Stanford | UCL
4. Cal Tech | ICL
5. Chicago | King's College
6. Princeton | Edinburgh
7. Yale | Manchester
8. Johns Hopkins | LSE
9. Cornell | Bristol
10. Pennsylvania | Warwick