Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:There is no minimum wage in Sweden. Missouri is simply following Bernie Sander's advise to be more like Sweden. Bernie should be thrilled they're now 30% closer to Sweden.
Bernie Sanders wrote:saxitoxin wrote:There is no minimum wage in Sweden. Missouri is simply following Bernie Sander's advise to be more like Sweden. Bernie should be thrilled they're now 30% closer to Sweden.
Thomas Tydal
Thomas Tydal, software developer, teacher, train driver
Answered Feb 28, 2016
the companies sign agreements with the unions and these agreements set the minimum level depending on the employee's age and experience
Bernie Sanders wrote:Yes Saxi, we should be more like Sweden! Plus everyone benefits from great healthcare!
saxitoxin wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:saxitoxin wrote:There is no minimum wage in Sweden. Missouri is simply following Bernie Sander's advise to be more like Sweden. Bernie should be thrilled they're now 30% closer to Sweden.
Thomas Tydal
Thomas Tydal, software developer, teacher, train driver
Answered Feb 28, 2016
the companies sign agreements with the unions and these agreements set the minimum level depending on the employee's age and experience
So basically exactly like the US then? Except with no minimum protections for non unionized employees?
saxitoxin wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:Yes Saxi, we should be more like Sweden! Plus everyone benefits from great healthcare!
ITT Bernie says Obamacare isn't "great"
Bernie Sanders wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:saxitoxin wrote:There is no minimum wage in Sweden. Missouri is simply following Bernie Sander's advise to be more like Sweden. Bernie should be thrilled they're now 30% closer to Sweden.
Thomas Tydal
Thomas Tydal, software developer, teacher, train driver
Answered Feb 28, 2016
the companies sign agreements with the unions and these agreements set the minimum level depending on the employee's age and experience
So basically exactly like the US then? Except with no minimum protections for non unionized employees?
Wrong Saxi, the unions are in decline here.
Bernie Sanders wrote:Why is Saxi defending the cut in minimum wage for haird working people of Missouri?
saxitoxin wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:Why is Saxi defending the cut in minimum wage for haird working people of Missouri?
The minimum wage isn't being cut for Missouri, only the city of St. Louis. St Louis voted for Clinton. Now their chickens are coming home to roost. That's the way this works. Friends get rewarded. Enemies get destroyed.
Bernie Sanders wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:Why is Saxi defending the cut in minimum wage for haird working people of Missouri?
The minimum wage isn't being cut for Missouri, only the city of St. Louis. St Louis voted for Clinton. Now their chickens are coming home to roost. That's the way this works. Friends get rewarded. Enemies get destroyed.
Sure Saxi, sure buddy....Just like the French and Russian Revolution.
Keep the working classes down and the rich and powerful will get their just desserts.
The second Seattle minimum wage increase, to as much as $13/hour on January 1, 2016,
resulted in:
o a 9% reduction in hours worked at wages below $19/hour. A disemployment effect of
this size would occur if, for example, a business that employed 11 low wage workers per
shift in 2014 cut back to about 10 workers per shift in 2016.
o a reduction of over $100 million per year in total payroll for low-wage jobs, measured as
total sum of increased wages received less wages lost due to employment reductions.
Total payroll losses average about $125 per job per month.
https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/file ... erview.pdf
Symmetry wrote:I don't trust people who use ellipsis marks incorrectly. They sound like they're unable to coherently finish their thoughts. They also tend to ramble at length, with frequent digressions, about how actual evidence is bad.
Symmetry wrote:I don't trust people who use ellipsis marks incorrectly. They sound like they're unable to coherently finish their thoughts. They also tend to ramble at length, with frequent digressions, about how actual evidence is bad.
jusplay4fun wrote:Talk about incoherence:
Symmetry typed:
about how actual evidence is bad.
What does that mean?
And you complain about incoherence? That is TROLLING, Symm.
Since you cannot or choose not to deal with my arguments, you must agree with them, Symm. You complain about use of ellipses and then complain about lack of coherence? Stop dealing with minutia and deal with the main ideas, Symm.
JP4FunSymmetry wrote:I don't trust people who use ellipsis marks incorrectly. They sound like they're unable to coherently finish their thoughts. They also tend to ramble at length, with frequent digressions, about how actual evidence is bad.
Symmetry wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Talk about incoherence:
Symmetry typed:
about how actual evidence is bad.
What does that mean?
And you complain about incoherence? That is TROLLING, Symm.
Since you cannot or choose not to deal with my arguments, you must agree with them, Symm. You complain about use of ellipses and then complain about lack of coherence? Stop dealing with minutia and deal with the main ideas, Symm.
JP4FunSymmetry wrote:I don't trust people who use ellipsis marks incorrectly. They sound like they're unable to coherently finish their thoughts. They also tend to ramble at length, with frequent digressions, about how actual evidence is bad.
Not really kid.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: pmac666