Moderator: Community Team
The ram wrote:The mainstream media had been extremely quiet about this.
Symmetry wrote:Meh, he was already under a suspended sentence for contempt of court, as far as I can tell. He was basically only not in prison already on a guarantee of good behaviour. No shock that this was a quick trial.
The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, he was already under a suspended sentence for contempt of court, as far as I can tell. He was basically only not in prison already on a guarantee of good behaviour. No shock that this was a quick trial.
It's ' bad behaviour ' to report on the rape of girls as young as 11?
Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, he was already under a suspended sentence for contempt of court, as far as I can tell. He was basically only not in prison already on a guarantee of good behaviour. No shock that this was a quick trial.
It's ' bad behaviour ' to report on the rape of girls as young as 11?
To interfere with an ongoing court case? Yeah, whatever his intentions, he was well warned. The guy is a career crook. Don't give him your time, kid.
The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, he was already under a suspended sentence for contempt of court, as far as I can tell. He was basically only not in prison already on a guarantee of good behaviour. No shock that this was a quick trial.
It's ' bad behaviour ' to report on the rape of girls as young as 11?
To interfere with an ongoing court case? Yeah, whatever his intentions, he was well warned. The guy is a career crook. Don't give him your time, kid.
How the hell was he interfering? The case was over, only the sentencing was left. He was standing away from the court building asking the perpetrators as they made their way to court if they feel any remorse.
Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, he was already under a suspended sentence for contempt of court, as far as I can tell. He was basically only not in prison already on a guarantee of good behaviour. No shock that this was a quick trial.
It's ' bad behaviour ' to report on the rape of girls as young as 11?
To interfere with an ongoing court case? Yeah, whatever his intentions, he was well warned. The guy is a career crook. Don't give him your time, kid.
How the hell was he interfering? The case was over, only the sentencing was left. He was standing away from the court building asking the perpetrators as they made their way to court if they feel any remorse.
If he was trying to interfere with the sentencing of a court case in front of the court. This is really a dumb guy to hold as a hero. PIck someone better.
Symmetry wrote:Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
You seem to be better informed about Tommy Robinson than myself. Could you give me his bail conditions? And do you find asking paedophiles who have already been found guilty of the crimes a breach of the peace?
Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
You seem to be better informed about Tommy Robinson than myself. Could you give me his bail conditions? And do you find asking paedophiles who have already been found guilty of the crimes a breach of the peace?
Jeez- don't get pissed off with me! I only told you the truth. The guy is a crook and he relies on people who he can get angry to follow him.
He definitely breached the peace, I just think that he isn't really that bothered about paedophilia, just more about his media prophilia.
He's a crook, mate.
The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:The ram wrote:Symmetry wrote:Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
You seem to be better informed about Tommy Robinson than myself. Could you give me his bail conditions? And do you find asking paedophiles who have already been found guilty of the crimes a breach of the peace?
Jeez- don't get pissed off with me! I only told you the truth. The guy is a crook and he relies on people who he can get angry to follow him.
He definitely breached the peace, I just think that he isn't really that bothered about paedophilia, just more about his media prophilia.
He's a crook, mate.
He was doing something we see time and time again. Standing outside a court asking the guilty if they feel any remorse. Please explain to me how that's a breach of the peace.
patches70 wrote:To be fair, England hasn't ever been known as the "bastion of freedom". They aren't citizens, they are subjects. Freedom of speech, never existed in England. Freedom of religion, never existed in England. Hell, the King of England invented his own religion because the Catholics wouldn't do what he wanted them to do. England has always been good at really only one thing, invading and enslaving other peoples. England through her history has invaded virtually every country on Earth at one point or another. They've spread misery and death around the world on an epic scale.
In a society like that this sort of stuff happens all the time. Dude knew what was going to happen to him and he proceeded anyway.
The only upside is England is basically just a third world country now, without much significance nor power to impose her will upon the world like they used to do. Nobody pays any attention to England anymore.
warmonger1981 wrote:The court has trials outside?. I thought the judge was inside the courthouse during a trial. And before the perpetrators getting inside the building for the trial there is no court being held. What were the conditions that put him back in jail? Not supposed to ask people about their pedophilia? Or asking Muslims questions?
Symmetry wrote
Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
warmonger1981 wrote:The court has trials outside?. I thought the judge was inside the courthouse during a trial. And before the perpetrators getting inside the building for the trial there is no court being held. What were the conditions that put him back in jail? Not supposed to ask people about their pedophilia? Or asking Muslims questions?
Symmetry wrote
Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
mrswdk wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:The court has trials outside?. I thought the judge was inside the courthouse during a trial. And before the perpetrators getting inside the building for the trial there is no court being held. What were the conditions that put him back in jail? Not supposed to ask people about their pedophilia? Or asking Muslims questions?
Symmetry wrote
Breaking the conditions of his suspended sentence put him back in jail. He's in jail because of his original sentence.
The judge is not the person who decides whether someone is guilty or not.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: pmac666