Moderator: Community Team
armati wrote:For me its preservation of purchasing power.
Silver could really move up I guess, Im not sure as Ive been reading the reasons for years and it still hasnt happened.
As far back as the Hunts the thinking has been the same, heck, in 64 they said they stopped making silver coins as they needed the silver.
It has retained its purchasing power tho, gas in 64 was...? 30 cents,
a quarter bought just about a gallon, today that quarter is..? 2.50?
a california gallon is $3 I hear, other states less, so, its about the same purchasing power.
I find it funny people cant figure that out.
paper devalues at 50% every 35 years.
I have more than any other kid on my block now so I figure I have loads.
I think the way to go is with bullion over coins (junk) if the world actually got to a shtf scenario, silvers not gonna do much for ya.
Clean the water I guess.
canadian pre 1920 is .925 american is .900
mookiemcgee wrote:
If you want a store of value in case of shtf, buy weapons and ammo.
mookiemcgee wrote:armati wrote:For me its preservation of purchasing power.
Silver could really move up I guess, Im not sure as Ive been reading the reasons for years and it still hasnt happened.
As far back as the Hunts the thinking has been the same, heck, in 64 they said they stopped making silver coins as they needed the silver.
It has retained its purchasing power tho, gas in 64 was...? 30 cents,
a quarter bought just about a gallon, today that quarter is..? 2.50?
a california gallon is $3 I hear, other states less, so, its about the same purchasing power.
I find it funny people cant figure that out.
paper devalues at 50% every 35 years.
I have more than any other kid on my block now so I figure I have loads.
I think the way to go is with bullion over coins (junk) if the world actually got to a shtf scenario, silvers not gonna do much for ya.
Clean the water I guess.
canadian pre 1920 is .925 american is .900
I dunno man, in theoretical terms I understand the store of value argument... I just don't think if your doomsday predictions come true that holding hard gold is gonna do much for you. In a doomsday scenari, for a joe blow gold ain't gonna help you protect your home from looting. It ain't gonna protect your kids from being kidnapped and raped by militia gangs. And if there are no stores with anything in them, whats gold gonna buy you? Maybe a way out of the country? But what stops them 'coyotes' from robbing you. I guess what I'm trying to say is if things get really bad, and institutions large and small collapse gold will not be your saving grace. You might think you have value, but the ground level reality is gold will be as useless to you as paper money. You can't eat it, you can't build with it, and if you wana trade with it you have to carry it around with you and it's a very easy thing to steal from an average joe.
re:paper money... it's invest-able. Sure it might devalue 50% in 35 years, but my investments in the last 5 years are up well over 50% so I'm beating the hell out of gold and far far outpacing any currency devaluation no?
Sure, during the short term there are pitfalls to investing, but over the long terms it going to dramatically outpace the currency devaluation. Again this is just me taking the point of view of whats best for me and my family. If i put 10k of my paper money into gold is say 2013 ( 5 years ago), vs say the nasdaq 100? Let's just say July 2013 gold was roughly 1250 usd per oz. Now it's what like 1150? Nasdaq 100 was roughly 4k now it's almost 8k. So if that 8k is really only worth 7.5k because of currency deval what do I care? Now I'm sure you could point to certain times where this isn't true, and I could point to times where it's a much more dramatic swing to my side. guess my question is if you aren't using these commodities as a hedge, and you are 99% invested in them you are basically 99% invested in no ROI (outside of perhaps a 50% increase over 35 years) and are ok with that? I mean it's basically saying I'm not even gonna try and increase my value, but I'm not gonna lose value either.... am i wrong?
I guess I'm just of the opinion I'd rather play the game right in front of me (and win at it), rather then preparing for something that may be inevitable but the result of which are far to unpredictable to properly prepare for (and may never come).
Anyway I'm certainly no economist, and Patches will likely shred me on this post... but I still think doomsday-ism is bad strategy, cus if you wrong you are wasting the now for a 'probably better off than others' then.
riskllama wrote:well, what are they keeping in Ft. Knox then? beanie babies???
armati wrote:mookiemcgee
I own gold for its unique attributes.
Your thinking about it wrongly, I in no way said "sell your house buy gold"
5-10% of INVESTABLE income is about right for about 95% of people.
AFTER all expenses are paid, lets say you have $1000 remaining for investment, $50-$100 should be gold.
That leaves $900-$950 for your "up 50% investments", new companys or maybe silver (which is a different beast than gold) or what ever the heck you invest in,
I dont have a doomsday shtf scenario, preppers are the people to get info from for that.
Gold should be bought on the same day every month and the price is no consideration, price is irrelevant, onces are what counts.
I understand tho, most people dont understand it, especially americans.
They have been taught since 1971 that gold is a barbarous relic.
Everyone else in the world knows what gold is and the american gov likes the world to think they have 8000 tons stored.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users