Conquer Club

Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby mookiemcgee on Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:58 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:The main question was not answered by p-rat. NO Surprise.

I will add nuance to my question:
How much MORE money does the US give away to Ukraine? For how much longer?

I did not say cut off ALL aid. Read again, p-rat. You misunderstood and/or ignored so that you can advance your biased opinions. Again, NO Surprise here.


How much is enough? Does it matter we are mostly sending good that have already been produced, but US companies who the gov't buys the goods from and supports US GDP/economic growth?

According to foreignassistance.gov, the US 'foreign aid' totaled 55 billion in 2023, 16 billion of it was for Ukraine. Do you think supporting Ukraine in the fight against Russia is more or less important to American interest then say the 20 billion spread across African nations? Should we be upset that we've spent 1.65 Billion on Ethopia in 2023?

What are the consequences for cutting aid to Ukraine now? If Russia takes over Ukraine and starts an invasion of Poland in 2025, and has a standing army at the German border by 2026 will that result in more or less US spending than 16 billion?

IMO foreign assistance has been off the rails crazy for most of my lifetime, but is Ukraine really where we should start the cutting? It seems like one of the only places in the world where the spending we do has real immediate ROI and actually provides immediate economic benefits and longer term geopolitical benefits. I feel like if we are trying to save money maybe cutting out half a billion to mozambique every year for the last decade+, or similar amounts to Nepal might be a better place to start.
Image
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby bigtoughralf on Thu Mar 14, 2024 2:45 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:What are the consequences for cutting aid to Ukraine now? If Russia takes over Ukraine and starts an invasion of Poland in 2025, and has a standing army at the German border by 2026 will that result in more or less US spending than 16 billion?


Yes, but if Russia then launches a nuclear apocalypse against the entirety of Western Europe, then invades the US and enslaves all Americans, US spending on military aid to Europe will be able to drop to 0. Just something to think about.
Image

https://www.unicef.org.uk/donate/children-in-gaza-crisis-appeal/

https://www.savethechildren.org.uk/how-you-can-help/emergencies/gaza-crisis
User avatar
Lieutenant bigtoughralf
 
Posts: 1815
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2021 8:49 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:07 pm

mookiemcgee wrote:What are the consequences for cutting aid to Ukraine now? If Russia takes over Ukraine and starts an invasion of Poland in 2025, and has a standing army at the German border by 2026 will that result in more or less US spending than 16 billion?


This is like the panic tactic Raytheon has been selling Americans for the last 50 years that North Korea is going to invade and roll-over South Korea at any moment.
Despite the fact they have 1/3 the population, 1/10 the GDP, so little fuel their army potentially can't move far enough to even cross the border, have to train their pilots on the ground because they don't have enough spare parts to launch their aircraft, and use submarines built in the 1960s. The early 1960s.

Russia has a population of 143 million. The EU has a population of 420 million. When in the last 100 years has a country invaded and conquered a second country three times its size?

Russia has been fighting Ukraine (pop. 20 million) for 2+ years and has only taken a fifth of its territory.

The idea Russia is going to ass blast Poland and impregnate Germany is a porn that Liz and Dick Cheney, Gregory Hayes, the ghost of George H.W. Bush, Victoria Nuland, and Hillary Clinton put on during circle jerks. It's not a serious thing that serious people think about. They don't even believe it. It's war porn.
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:17 pm

Warmongers take advantage of the natural lack of curiosity Americans have about the world and their complete disinterest in geography.

In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold support for the Contras on the idea that a Sandinista government in Nicaragua would invade Mexico and then be at the doorstep to Texas. Apparently Google Maps didn't exist then and enough people didn't own atlases that they got the public to buy it.
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Dukasaur on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:31 pm

jusplay4fun wrote:Here is the main question here:

How much more money does the US send to Ukraine (money we DO NOT have, btw, since this merely adds to OUR deficit) just to give Russia and Putin a "bloody nose?" I think Duk said it well a while ago that the Russians have so many more people, resources, and money to throw at the outnumbered Ukrainians.


This is a legitimate question.

Yes, in every major metric, from population to GDP, Russia outnumbers Ukraine 3-to-1 or better. In many minor strategic categories, it's far worse than that -- in oil production for instance, Russia outpaces Ukraine 300-to-1. In many strategic metals, Russia is among the largest producers in the world while Ukraine's supplies are trivial.

Now, the Ukrainians do have some advantages: since they're fighting on home soil, they're better motivated, better suited to the terrain, etc. But those kinds of things can give some local tactical advantage, but not long-term strategic advantage. The courage and determination with which the Ukrainians have fought has been absolutely exemplary, but without massive outside help, they cannot in the long run survive.

From the point of view of the Ukrainians, there's no question. They know Putin plans to kill or enslave all of them, so there's no doubt that they have to fight with everything they have, and ask the rest of the world for everything else. It's not greedy to make demands when your very survival is on the line.

From the point of view of everybody else, it's a tougher question. How motivated can everyone else be?

For the Poles and the Czechs and the Lithuanians and everyone else who at one time or another has lived under the Russian boot, this question is almost as existential as it is for the Ukrainians. Putin wants to be remembered as the conqueror who rebuilt the Soviet Empire, and he's a sociopath who doesn't mind killing millions if that's what it takes to cement that legacy.

The farther afield you go, the less existential the question gets. Even at the height of the Soviet Empire, Russian tanks never reached the Rhine. Germans are a little less worried than are Poles; Frenchmen are a little less concerned than are Germans; Englishmen are a little less disquieted than are Frenchmen. I don't think anyone in Europe should completely ignore the threat, but there's no doubt that the farther you live from the Russian border, the less this question is going to occupy your mind.

For the American taxpayer in Peoria, the question is very distant and not really existential at all. No matter how bad things get in Europe, nobody is going to invade the U.S. Even if Putin conquers all of Eurasia, the consequence for the U.S. will simply mean the loss of profits for American businesses tied to import/export and U.S. dollar hegemony. Some people will lose their shirt, but for the majority nothing will change. A small drop in standard of living, but not much more than that. I really can't argue with American taxpayers who ask, "why are we paying for this shit?" I try to tell them it's a glorious David and Goliath story, and when the histories are written you want to be on the side of David. But that argument loses power quickly.

Here's where it starts to really bother me.

Since the beginning, I've always expected Ukraine to lose this war. But I thought it was finally the wake-up call Europe needed to rebuild and rearm. And, at first, there were signs that it would. But two years in, there doesn't seem to be any sense of urgency. Most European nations have raised their military expenditures a little bit, but not nearly close to what you could call a wartime level. Nobody has reinstituted universal conscription, which will so desperately needed. By now, Leopard IIs should be coming off the assembly line at 50/week, not 50/year. France should have ordered 600 Rafales last year, not 21. The great citizen armies of France and Sweden are becoming a memory. As for the glorious British Navy, I can't even think about its current status without crying.

Unfortunately, JP, I have nothing substantive to offer you. As long as the nations of Europe spend more money smoking dope than preparing for war against the nutcase in the Kremlin, I can't give you a good reason why you should be picking up the slack. I hope you do, I beg you to, but I can't in all honesty give you a rational reason why you should.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27036
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Dukasaur on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:33 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold support for the Contras on the idea that a Sandinista government in Nicaragua would invade Mexico and then be at the doorstep to Texas.


I was politically active in the 1980s, and I never heard any argument like that. Is this some more revisionist history that Darth Drumph has taught you?
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27036
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby mookiemcgee on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:33 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
The idea Russia is going to ass blast Poland and impregnate Germany is a porn that Liz and Dick Cheney, Gregory Hayes, the ghost of George H.W. Bush, Victoria Nuland, and Hillary Clinton put on during circle jerks.


I'm pretty sure you said this exact thing about Ukraine being invaded by Russia in the years before the war started, except it was Linda Searcy not Victoria Nuland.

I wonder how much money Russia has spent trying to influence US voters to oppose Ukraine aid via buying off right wing media influencers and republican House members? maybe them sending the US all that 'financial aid' offsets what we send to Ukraine?
Image
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Lonous on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:41 pm

Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold support for the Contras on the idea that a Sandinista government in Nicaragua would invade Mexico and then be at the doorstep to Texas.


I was politically active in the 1980s, and I never heard any argument like that. Is this some more revisionist history that Darth Drumph has taught you?

Shenanigans. It was impossible to be politically active and cognizant of western politics in the 1980's and not hear about 'The Domino Theory'

Dominos in Central America: Will They Fall? Does It Matter?
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538814
User avatar
Major Lonous
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:34 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Dukasaur on Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:45 pm

Lonous wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold support for the Contras on the idea that a Sandinista government in Nicaragua would invade Mexico and then be at the doorstep to Texas.


I was politically active in the 1980s, and I never heard any argument like that. Is this some more revisionist history that Darth Drumph has taught you?

Shenanigans. It was impossible to be politically active and cognizant of western politics in the 1980's and not hear about 'The Domino Theory'

Dominos in Central America: Will They Fall? Does It Matter?
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538814


Domino theory does not suggest that Nicaragua will invade Mexico.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Lieutenant Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27036
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby jusplay4fun on Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:06 pm

Dukasaur wrote:
jusplay4fun wrote:Here is the main question here:

How much more money does the US send to Ukraine (money we DO NOT have, btw, since this merely adds to OUR deficit) just to give Russia and Putin a "bloody nose?" I think Duk said it well a while ago that the Russians have so many more people, resources, and money to throw at the outnumbered Ukrainians.


This is a legitimate question.

Yes, in every major metric, from population to GDP, Russia outnumbers Ukraine 3-to-1 or better. In many minor strategic categories, it's far worse than that -- in oil production for instance, Russia outpaces Ukraine 300-to-1. In many strategic metals, Russia is among the largest producers in the world while Ukraine's supplies are trivial.

Now, the Ukrainians do have some advantages: since they're fighting on home soil, they're better motivated, better suited to the terrain, etc. But those kinds of things can give some local tactical advantage, but not long-term strategic advantage. The courage and determination with which the Ukrainians have fought has been absolutely exemplary, but without massive outside help, they cannot in the long run survive.

From the point of view of the Ukrainians, there's no question. They know Putin plans to kill or enslave all of them, so there's no doubt that they have to fight with everything they have, and ask the rest of the world for everything else. It's not greedy to make demands when your very survival is on the line.

From the point of view of everybody else, it's a tougher question. How motivated can everyone else be?

For the Poles and the Czechs and the Lithuanians and everyone else who at one time or another has lived under the Russian boot, this question is almost as existential as it is for the Ukrainians. Putin wants to be remembered as the conqueror who rebuilt the Soviet Empire, and he's a sociopath who doesn't mind killing millions if that's what it takes to cement that legacy.

The farther afield you go, the less existential the question gets. Even at the height of the Soviet Empire, Russian tanks never reached the Rhine. Germans are a little less worried than are Poles; Frenchmen are a little less concerned than are Germans; Englishmen are a little less disquieted than are Frenchmen. I don't think anyone in Europe should completely ignore the threat, but there's no doubt that the farther you live from the Russian border, the less this question is going to occupy your mind.

For the American taxpayer in Peoria, the question is very distant and not really existential at all. No matter how bad things get in Europe, nobody is going to invade the U.S. Even if Putin conquers all of Eurasia, the consequence for the U.S. will simply mean the loss of profits for American businesses tied to import/export and U.S. dollar hegemony. Some people will lose their shirt, but for the majority nothing will change. A small drop in standard of living, but not much more than that. I really can't argue with American taxpayers who ask, "why are we paying for this shit?" I try to tell them it's a glorious David and Goliath story, and when the histories are written you want to be on the side of David. But that argument loses power quickly.

Here's where it starts to really bother me.

Since the beginning, I've always expected Ukraine to lose this war. But I thought it was finally the wake-up call Europe needed to rebuild and rearm. And, at first, there were signs that it would. But two years in, there doesn't seem to be any sense of urgency. Most European nations have raised their military expenditures a little bit, but not nearly close to what you could call a wartime level. Nobody has reinstituted universal conscription, which will so desperately needed. By now, Leopard IIs should be coming off the assembly line at 50/week, not 50/year. France should have ordered 600 Rafales last year, not 21. The great citizen armies of France and Sweden are becoming a memory. As for the glorious British Navy, I can't even think about its current status without crying.

Unfortunately, JP, I have nothing substantive to offer you. As long as the nations of Europe spend more money smoking dope than preparing for war against the nutcase in the Kremlin, I can't give you a good reason why you should be picking up the slack. I hope you do, I beg you to, but I can't in all honesty give you a rational reason why you should.


First of all, Duk, thanks for your honest assessment when it comes to more US aid to Ukraine and the rationale to justify it to the American people, those in "Peoria" to use your analogy.

Your analysis was honest and I think profound. Thanks for that, too. Yes, I think that most in Europe would rather spend money on alcohol, recreational drugs, and other distractions AND not on their military. The same hold true for the US, except that we (some of us, anyway) want to spend the money of our grandchildren (via government deficits), or someone else's grandchildren and of the immigrants who became and are citizens. Many Americans do not see China or Russia as legitimate threats to their existence.

The war in Gaza (and a bit of the China threat) has deflected US attention from Ukraine, that and the fact that there is more or less a stalemate at the Ukraine-Russian border. I have read where the Ukrainian push has stalled and that Russia has made some advances on a few cities and/or towns at the border. And Americans tend to lose focus on many issues after some two years are so, and here we are.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 6131
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:17 pm

The Anti-Saxi Coalition didn't bring their A Game today so I'm just gonna knock all these off in a single post.

Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
In the 1980s, the Reagan Administration sold support for the Contras on the idea that a Sandinista government in Nicaragua would invade Mexico and then be at the doorstep to Texas.


I was politically active in the 1980s, and I never heard any argument like that. Is this some more revisionist history that Darth Drumph has taught you?


    Reagan: "Using Nicaragua as a base, the Soviets and Cubans can become the dominant power in the crucial corridor between North and South America. Established there, they will be in a position to threaten the Panama Canal! Interdict our vital Caribbean sealanes! And, ultimately, move against Mexico! ... The Soviets and the Sandinistas must not be permitted to crush freedom in Central America and THREATEN OUR SECURITY ON OUR OWN DOORSTEP!!!"

    https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/ ... -nicaragua

mcgee wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Russia has a population of 143 million. The EU has a population of 420 million. When in the last 100 years has a country invaded and conquered a second country three times its size?


I wonder how much money Russia has spent trying to influence US voters to oppose Ukraine aid via buying off right wing media influencers and republican House members?

Image


fixed
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:20 pm

McGee and the Mrs at breakfast this morning ---



Dukasaur wrote:the Czechs


Czechoslovakia hiked her dress and spread her legs. And in 1948, the USSR finally did what she'd been begging the USSR to do for years (all the way back to her independence from Austro-Hungary).

Example 1 of 1,000,000:

    The Soviet Union had been gradually exercising greater influence in Czechoslovakia and, in 1935, concluded a mutual defense treaty with it. By the following year, military exchanges had occurred between the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia, with the USSR assessing the potential of Czechoslovakia's highly developed network of aerodromes as staging areas for Soviet Air Forces bomber squadrons in a future European war and Czechoslovakia extending credit to the USSR for weapons procurement.

    Against this backdrop, Portugal had aligned itself with the Nationalist forces in Spain's ongoing Civil War, which were battling the Soviet-backed Republican faction. Czechoslovakia, meanwhile, had declared itself neutral in the conflict and made a pledge not to supply either side with armaments, though — it was publicly revealed some decades later — Department II, Czechoslovakia's intelligence agency, was helping Soviet military advisors surreptitiously enter Spain by providing fraudulent passports and other technical assistance. Meanwhile, in early 1937, several Czechoslovak citizens had been expelled from Portugal after the Portuguese government accused them of being engaged in unspecified illicit activities on behalf of Spanish Republican forces. At around the same time, a deadly series of unsolved bombings in Lisbon were attributed to foreigners of an unnamed nation, which some speculated might have been Czechoslovakia.


    1937 dispute between Czechoslovakia and Portugal
Czechoslovakia was the one-legged, $2 whore of Europe, but the Czechs and Slovaks have spent years (mostly successfully) trying to get everyone to reimagine her as a 16 year-old virgin who was unjustly ravaged due to her stunning beauty.
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Mar 20, 2024 10:16 pm

LOL Russian sanctions going great! :lol:

User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Fri Mar 22, 2024 2:03 pm

Biden to Ukraine: "Don't attack Russian oil refineries!!! It'll drive up gasoline prices and I gotta win my election. It's all about me!"

Russia launched a huge barrage of missiles and drones at Ukraine’s energy infrastructure overnight, leaving several cities without electricity and damaging the Dnipro hydropower plant, Ukraine's biggest dam. At the same time, Washington has asked Ukraine to halt drone strikes on Russia’s oil refineries, out of fear of driving up crude oil prices.

“I don’t recall the White House having an issue with Ukrainian drone attacks against Moscow’s elite suburbs or other non-energy targets. I think Russia’s energy infrastructure is more sensitive for them, especially in an election year,” said Daniel Vajdich, president of Yorktown Solutions, which advises Ukraine’s state-owned energy sector.

https://www.politico.eu/article/energy- ... ussia-war/


The moral superiority of the West! =D> =D> =D> :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby jusplay4fun on Sat Mar 23, 2024 2:48 am

Finally, some TRUTH from Russia about its war in Ukraine:

Russia just gave up on the biggest lie it tells itself

Russia has clung to the term "special military operation" to describe its invasion of Ukraine.

But a Kremlin spokesperson said Friday that "we are in a state of war," blaming the West.

Putin signed a law effectively criminalizing calling the attack on Ukraine a "war" or "invasion."

Russia is finally calling its invasion of Ukraine a "war" after spending more than two years describing it euphemistically as a "special military operation."

The change became clear on Friday when Dmitry Peskov, a Kremlin spokesperson, spoke with the Russian publication Arguments and Facts.

"We are in a state of war," Peskov said. "Yes, it started out as a special military operation, but as soon as this group was formed, when the collective West became a participant in this on the side of Ukraine, it became a war for us."
According to Reuters, he added: "Everyone should understand this, for their internal motivation."

The phrase "special military operation" is how Russian officials have overwhelmingly referred to Russia's full-scale invasion since it was launched in February 2022.

But there have been some notable slips.

Russian President Vladimir Putin called it a "war" in December 2022, prompting one lawmaker to call for action against him because of a law Putin put in place that effectively criminalized any reference to it being a "war" or "invasion."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-just-gave-up-on-the-biggest-lie-it-tells-itself/ar-BB1klNSZ?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=c8b75b3e6de345dfa59794c937bd774c&ei=15

Will saxi stop telling his lies anytime soon?
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 6131
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Apr 03, 2024 11:40 am

Ukraine broken

Ukraine is at great risk of its front lines collapsing
According to high-ranking Ukrainian officers, the military picture is grim and Russian generals could find success wherever they decide to focus their upcoming offensive.

The officers said there’s a great risk of the front lines collapsing wherever Russian generals decide to focus their offensive. Moreover, thanks to a much greater weight in numbers and the guided aerial bombs that have been smashing Ukrainian positions for weeks now, Russia will likely be able to “penetrate the front line and to crash it in some parts,” they said.

They spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak freely.

“There’s nothing that can help Ukraine now because there are no serious technologies able to compensate Ukraine for the large mass of troops Russia is likely to hurl at us. We don’t have those technologies, and the West doesn’t have them as well in sufficient numbers,” one of the top-ranking military sources told POLITICO.

https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine ... ar-russia/
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby mookiemcgee on Thu Apr 04, 2024 2:25 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 4884
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby jusplay4fun on Thu Apr 04, 2024 5:49 am

And the fighting continues, and Ukrainians do have some victories.

One of Russia’s most massive armored attacks in months was crushed in the Avdiivka sector over the weekend, with a crack Ukrainian paratrooper unit claiming the destruction of more than 20 of the Kremlin’s tanks and armored fighting vehicles in a single day of fighting.

The March 30 assault by elements of Russia’s 90th Tank Division hit fortifications manned by Ukraine’s 25th Airborne Brigade, a volunteer formation fighting in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas sector for more than two years. The 25th is the Armed Forces of Ukraine’s (AFU) sole regular army paratrooper unit.

Sources on both the Russian and Ukrainian sides confirmed the March Russian attack came across mostly open ground to the west of the city Avdiivka, near the village Tonenke. A reported 36 Russian tanks followed by 12 BMP infantry carriers led off the attempt to break into Ukrainian defenses to the west of the village but failed to do so after hitting fierce resistance, the sources said.
(...)
Still images geolocated to the battle area and published to open sources confirmed some but not all of the Ukrainian vehicular kill claims. It was not possible to determine total Russian personnel losses, however, some video showed at least 20 corpses lying near knocked-out combat vehicles.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/30428

The war is not over yet.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jusplay4fun
 
Posts: 6131
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Pack Rat on Thu Apr 04, 2024 12:21 pm

If the MAGA nutjobs in the House of Representatives don't stop playing games of "I love Putin!", Ukraine will see a huge loss in territories.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Pack Rat
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2023 11:03 pm

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Thu Apr 04, 2024 2:38 pm

Pack Rat wrote:If the MAGA nutjobs in the House of Representatives don't stop playing games of "I love Putin!", Ukraine will see a huge loss in territories.


Image
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby Pack Rat on Thu Apr 04, 2024 2:50 pm

You gotta love Saxitoxin's plan for world domination!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Pack Rat
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2023 11:03 pm

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby pmac666 on Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:47 pm

Looks like there will be a vote on the Ukraine aid next week.
That should do it til November.
Can someone please check on poor Saxi?
User avatar
Colonel pmac666
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:37 pm
525

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby pmac666 on Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:30 pm

And its through.
Marg3toes is not happy. Interesting days ahead in the clown party. :lol:
User avatar
Colonel pmac666
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:37 pm
525

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:41 pm

pmac666 wrote:And its through.
Marg3toes is not happy. Interesting days ahead in the clown party. :lol:


Too late.

You can buy all the guns in the world but Ukraine's real shortage is people to fire them.

Moreover, you can vote $30 quadrillion to Ukraine but no amount of money can buy weapons that don't exist.

Image
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Ukraine unbroken two years into Putin's War

Postby saxitoxin on Sat Apr 20, 2024 2:46 pm

The dark days for Ukraine are only getting darker. Three days ago ...

Yet the fact that the Nato secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, publicly accepts that to end the war Ukraine will have to negotiate with Russia and decide “what kind of compromises they’re willing to do” is a clear indication that things are not going well for Ukraine.

There are several reasons for what appears to be an increasingly defeatist narrative. First is the worsening situation at the front where Ukraine lacks both manpower and equipment and ammunition to hold the line against Russia. This will not change any time soon. The new Ukrainian mobilisation law has only just been approved. It will take time to train, deploy and integrate new troops at the front.

At the same time, Russia’s economy has been resilient to western sanctions and seen growth driven by the war. On top of deliveries from Iran and North Korea dual-use technology, including electrical components and machine tools for arms manufacture, has been supplied by China.

Moscow has also managed to produce a lot of its own equipment and ammunition. Much of this is being made in facilities beyond the reach of Ukrainian weapons.

https://theconversation.com/ukraine-is- ... sia-227875
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 12121
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bigtoughralf