bigtoughralf wrote:detlef wrote:You apparently didn't even read the article you posted.
You apparently didn't even read the OP you replied to.
Wow, telling people they're wrong without any explanation is both easy AND fun. Thanks for the inspiration!
The article was not about people feeling traumatized for being paid as you said it was. It was about all the BS they've had to go through to get paid. It was about having to reach out to the same entity that abused them in order to get paid. Which seems pretty freaking awful.
If "Should they now be given extra compensation to make up for the damage inflicted on them by their receipt of the original compensation?" was not intended to make light of their current situation, then you should figure out a better way to say what you mean.
Doesn't really matter. According to basically everyone, you're an a-hole and I shouldn't have bothered to engage you. You may have the last word as I will be moving on now.