Conquer Club

America Vs europe

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

America Vs europe

Postby cena-rules on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:01 pm

discuss so we dont hijacks clappys thread
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby soundout9 on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:01 pm

Thank you cena now
Image
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby ignotus on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:10 pm

Europe! :P
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby The Weird One on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:12 pm

I say this as an American having never been to Europe: Europe :wink:
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.

ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
User avatar
Sergeant The Weird One
 
Posts: 7059
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: cursing the spiteful dice gods

Postby F1fth on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:18 pm

I'm sorry, but this is the most pointless and arbitrary fucking thread I've ever seen. Let it die after this post.
<>---------------------------<>
......Come play CC Mafia,
.....where happiness lies
<>----------[Link]----------<>

REMEMBER NORSE // REMEMBER DANCING MUSTARD
User avatar
Corporal F1fth
 
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:15 am

Postby DAZMCFC on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:21 pm

Great Britain. stuff you Yanks and Europeans. :twisted:
Image
high score:2765
high place:116
User avatar
Major DAZMCFC
 
Posts: 2790
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: The Pleasant Chaps....

Postby Harijan on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:24 pm

to elaborate the hijacking issue.

I claimed that my pet peeve is europe's public disdain for America while relying on the American military to protect europe all through the cold war, really ever since WW2. It irritates me that Europe has no problem ripping on the single strongest military force that the world has ever known when that military force has saved Europe over and over again.

I do not suppor the Iraq war.
I only listen to Bush when I need a laugh.
I believe that the current American foreign policy is highly destructive and dangerous.

But I live here, it is my responsibility to have opinions about that shit. I am the one who has to get rid of Bush type thinking. Until the EU or any individual european country has something to offer besides critism, STFU and go work on fixing the problem.
User avatar
Captain Harijan
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Phx

Postby ignotus on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:24 pm

DAZMCFC wrote:Great Britain. stuff you Yanks and Europeans. :twisted:


You brits were always extrawurst... :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby cawck mongler on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:30 pm

Harijan wrote:to elaborate the hijacking issue.

I claimed that my pet peeve is europe's public disdain for America while relying on the American military to protect europe all through the cold war, really ever since WW2. It irritates me that Europe has no problem ripping on the single strongest military force that the world has ever known when that military force has saved Europe over and over again.

I do not suppor the Iraq war.
I only listen to Bush when I need a laugh.
I believe that the current American foreign policy is highly destructive and dangerous.

But I live here, it is my responsibility to have opinions about that shit. I am the one who has to get rid of Bush type thinking. Until the EU or any individual european country has something to offer besides critism, STFU and go work on fixing the problem.


Jesus f*ck you're a moron. HEY GUESS WHAT YOU FUCKING RETARD, WW1/2 WAS EUROPEANS VS. OTHER EUROPEANS, SO EUROPE WOULDN'T HAVE LOST EITHER FUCKING WAY, US only helped the side that would eventually win both times, and stole the glory away from Russia and the triple entente.

Cold War= Aftermath of WW2. If WW2 never happened, Europe would've been able to defend itself against Russia, and Russia wouldn't even be a superpower.

Your entire argument is that history turned out the way it did entirely because of America, which is a bullshit argument and you are batshit insane. Now go play nicely in preschool assfucker.
User avatar
Sergeant cawck mongler
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm

Postby Harijan on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:39 pm

OMG I thought CM was killed by his parents. My life was so much brighter about 2 minutes ago.

Cm, you are right, I am operating under the assumption that Europe was better off beating Hitler than Hitler beating the rest of Europe.

It is true I have no basis for this assumption other than common fucking sense.

Please go try and f*ck the family dog again so that your parents take away computer privileged for a few more weeks.
User avatar
Captain Harijan
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Phx

Postby cawck mongler on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:16 pm

Harijan wrote:OMG I thought CM was killed by his parents. My life was so much brighter about 2 minutes ago.

Cm, you are right, I am operating under the assumption that Europe was better off beating Hitler than Hitler beating the rest of Europe.

It is true I have no basis for this assumption other than common fucking sense.

Please go try and f*ck the family dog again so that your parents take away computer privileged for a few more weeks.


I ASSUME YOU ARE TO RETARDED TO EVEN REALISE THAT RUSSIA DID MOST OF THE FIGHTING, AND AMERIKKKAS CONTRIBUTIONS WERE REDUNDANT
User avatar
Sergeant cawck mongler
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm

Postby Napoleon Ier on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:22 pm

America speeded the war up quite a bit, but fundamentally, almost any nation alone would have eventually won. Nazism would have collapsed, occupation overthrown, even if it would have taken until 60s.

Yes, however, look at casualties and Russia obviously was the main contributor t the War Effort (but this doesnt answer the Cold War, which America did more or less single handedly win)
Deaths: (millions)
UK 0.45
FRANCE 0.62
USA 0.41
USSR 10-25
GERMANY 5-7
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby muy_thaiguy on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:25 pm

cawck mongler wrote:
Harijan wrote:OMG I thought CM was killed by his parents. My life was so much brighter about 2 minutes ago.

Cm, you are right, I am operating under the assumption that Europe was better off beating Hitler than Hitler beating the rest of Europe.

It is true I have no basis for this assumption other than common fucking sense.

Please go try and f*ck the family dog again so that your parents take away computer privileged for a few more weeks.


I ASSUME YOU ARE TO RETARDED TO EVEN REALISE THAT RUSSIA DID MOST OF THE FIGHTING, AND AMERIKKKAS CONTRIBUTIONS WERE REDUNDANT
cawk, SHUT UP! Russia and Europe both recieved large amounts of supplies, weapons, and materials from the US. So I suggest you shut your Socialist trap now.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Napoleon Ier on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:30 pm

excellent point. no doubt supply of goods created at the profit of the oppressed proletariat do not count our socialo friend...
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby cena-rules on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:41 pm

I do not suppor the Iraq war.<<good It is the most pointless thing on Earth
I only listen to Bush when I need a laugh.<<are you one of these internet wankers that jumps on everything he says then goes on and on about freedom of speech
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby btownmeggy on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:43 pm

What's the question?
User avatar
Corporal btownmeggy
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Postby cena-rules on Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:44 pm

whats better and why
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby cawck mongler on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:12 pm

YOU FUCKING AMERIKKANS WERE THE ONLY FUCKING FAGGOTS IN THE COLD WAR WITH RUSSIA, WHEN THERE ARE TWO FUCKING SUPERPOWERS, ITS PRETTY FUCKING OBVIOUS THEY'RE GOING TO FUCKING FIGHT, ITS NOT LIKE THE REST OF EUROPE GAVE A SHIT.

Yeah, and if you actually think Nazism wouldn't have fallen, you are sadly mistaken my retarded friend. Eugenics was big back then, Eisenhower even supported it; it was only after the war that everyone started associating it with the people who kicked their asses and thought it was bad.

Everyone hated the USSR, and it took them 50 years to get free of them, and unlike the USSR, Germany actually had an economy that wasn't shit. And since everyone who wasn't a Nazi was shot, I can see the 3rd Reich lasting a long time.
User avatar
Sergeant cawck mongler
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm

Postby wicked on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:20 pm

Let's all welcome Cawck to the ban list! Keep it civil guys.. I know no one wants to join him.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby Napoleon Ier on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:26 pm

Yeah, and if you actually think Nazism wouldn't have fallen, you are sadly mistaken my retarded friend.


no need to get snippy





Eugenics was big back then, Eisenhower even supported it; it was only after the war that everyone started associating it with the people who kicked their asses and thought it was bad.


err...hm. Eisenhower supported it, so what? the rest of Europe were just very pissed off at the Nazis for well, bombing their homes, shooting their husbands and sons before occupation and requisitioning businesses. The question is not about eugenics but resistance. Supplantation ofthe whole of a people by the Germans could not have been sustained...
people could not give a monkeys about eugenics,but didaout their countries and freedom


Everyone hated the USSR, and it took them 50 years to get free of them, and unlike the USSR, Germany actually had an economy that wasn't shit. And since everyone who wasn't a Nazi was shot, I can see the 3rd Reich lasting a long time.


USSR is not the subject of debate. I said Nazism would not last in Europe.

Non-nazis weren't shot for thesimple reason everyone pretended to be or resisted (underground, fighting in clandestine operations). You cannot take and hold a foreign nation in Europe unless yo are extremely skilled and doing it gradually. The Nazis economy would have overheated, it was based on slave labour and public schemes.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby muy_thaiguy on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:29 pm

Not much point in replying, he was just banned. But I guess that gives you the last word in this I guess.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby cawck mongler on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:30 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
Yeah, and if you actually think Nazism wouldn't have fallen, you are sadly mistaken my retarded friend.


no need to get snippy





Eugenics was big back then, Eisenhower even supported it; it was only after the war that everyone started associating it with the people who kicked their asses and thought it was bad.


err...hm. Eisenhower supported it, so what? the rest of Europe were just very pissed off at the Nazis for well, bombing their homes, shooting their husbands and sons before occupation and requisitioning businesses. The question is not about eugenics but resistance. Supplantation ofthe whole of a people by the Germans could not have been sustained...
people could not give a monkeys about eugenics,but didaout their countries and freedom


Everyone hated the USSR, and it took them 50 years to get free of them, and unlike the USSR, Germany actually had an economy that wasn't shit. And since everyone who wasn't a Nazi was shot, I can see the 3rd Reich lasting a long time.


USSR is not the subject of debate. I said Nazism would not last in Europe.

Non-nazis weren't shot for thesimple reason everyone pretended to be or resisted (underground, fighting in clandestine operations). You cannot take and hold a foreign nation in Europe unless yo are extremely skilled and doing it gradually. The Nazis economy would have overheated, it was based on slave labour and public schemes.


Yeah right, if people cared so much about their freedom then how did Russia conquer half of Europe and not have to worry about it for 50 years?
User avatar
Sergeant cawck mongler
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm

Postby Napoleon Ier on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:34 pm

Insufficient fighters left after WWII. They rolled in and booted out the Nazis, and then just took control. People thought they were liberators, but no. Then the great superpowers decided at Yalta for everyone who would be Russian subjects and who wouldn't. Besides, the clue is in your own post :ony 1/2 Europe. They were held.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby cawck mongler on Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:38 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Insufficient fighters left after WWII. They rolled in and booted out the Nazis, and then just took control. People thought they were liberators, but no. Then the great superpowers decided at Yalta for everyone who would be Russian subjects and who wouldn't. Besides, the clue is in your own post :ony 1/2 Europe. They were held.


'Durr, I'm contradicting my earlier post saying its impossible to hold a country in Europe, hurr', give it a rest you little faggot, contrary to your beliefs, it isn't hard to take control of another country when your own country is stable. Burma is very unstable and just had massive riots, yet it held together, so I'm pretty sure Germany, with its huge industrial base could control a few frogs and backwater shitholes like Greece and Poland.

AmeriKKKa is even in control of Iraq, and they barely murder anyone.
User avatar
Sergeant cawck mongler
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm

Postby Napoleon Ier on Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:06 pm

Let me ask you, what are your references, where are you from?
Do you think you can use your cras insults to maintain your ludicrous sophistry?

I shouldn't even bother answering you really but here we go :

Poland and France killed more Nazis that America and Britain put together. They used RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS, so before you insut these places consider the balls it took to do this despite the huge massacres such as Oradour sur Glane et al.. USSR? It COLLAPSED, buddy! Poland is INDEPENDANT!

So please, go away, read, think, and when you reach are certain intellectual maturity we can discuss.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Next

Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun