DaGip wrote:Sorry, trains don't make pyroclastic flows and melt steel into liquid pools for weeks and weeks.
Huh?
1. Pyroclastic flows are solely the result of certain types of volcanoes. Unless the Twin Towers were actually built to conceal two very tall volcanoes in New York's midst, I don't see one of them occuring.
2. Linkage (Not Youtube) on the melted steel? Large pools of molten steel would have made rescue efforts nigh-impossible, not to mention frying the skin off anyone who got too close.
DaGip wrote: Trains do not cause tons of steel columns to fall as if they were in a vacuum.
Not even the conspiracists are claiming that
THEY secretly somehow created and maintained a vacuum which no-one noticed, nor suffered any ill effects of, just to make the TT fall that little bit faster. It's a puzzling piece of information that supports neither side's argument.
DaGip wrote: Trains do not leave the trace signature of a nuclear device.
Again, linkage? I don't think
anyone is stupid enough to use nuclear explosives to do a job conventional explosives would have done in a crowded city centre.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!