Moderator: Community Team
jonesthecurl wrote:All the suggested ones were later than 19th century. Are earlier candidates allowed?
prismsaber wrote:Nero - The Roman emperors were so bad that one could arguably make a type 5 most evil list containing only these guys. In my opinion Nero was the worst of the bunch.
mpjh wrote:Hernando Cortez is not later than 19th century.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:If Mao Zedong was so evil, then why is he on every picture in China (I don't remember much about him from history, just that he tried to go back to the old and he failed. The rest is all HISTORY)
I had to..
Grooveman2007 wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:If Mao Zedong was so evil, then why is he on every picture in China (I don't remember much about him from history, just that he tried to go back to the old and he failed. The rest is all HISTORY)
I had to..
In his efforts to industrialize he forced farmers to work in factories instead of growing food, while at the same time he didn't modernize agriculture, so the result was some 26 million people starved to death because he refused to allow farmers to leave the factories.
Pedronicus wrote:If you were a miner, you'd want to see Margret Thatcher in there
Guilty_Biscuit wrote:
VOTE MANDY!
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
InkL0sed wrote:prismsaber wrote:Nero - The Roman emperors were so bad that one could arguably make a type 5 most evil list containing only these guys. In my opinion Nero was the worst of the bunch.
Very true.
CrazyAnglican wrote:InkL0sed wrote:prismsaber wrote:Nero - The Roman emperors were so bad that one could arguably make a type 5 most evil list containing only these guys. In my opinion Nero was the worst of the bunch.
Very true.
What not Caligula? Commodus?
At least Nero had an urban renewal plan.
InkL0sed wrote: I was referring to the fact that the Romans had so many...
PS. I would have chosen Caligula.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users