should tournie privs be granted for clans ?

[Optimus Prime]

No, rebel, you clearly don't hear me loud and clear.

Non-premium members are not supposed to have access to an unlimited number of private games. Plain and simple. If a non-premium wants to play in a tournament with one of their slots, they may do so, but that is not an "unlimited" number, it is finite until the tournament ends.

In-clan privileges for non-premium members would completely circumvent the whole point in having private games as a premium feature.

[yorkiepeter]

No, rebel, you clearly don't hear me loud and clear.

Non-premium members are not supposed to have access to an unlimited number of private games. Plain and simple. If a non-premium wants to play in a tournament with one of their slots, they may do so, but that is not an "unlimited" number, it is finite until the tournament ends.

In-clan privileges for non-premium members would completely circumvent the whole point in having private games as a premium feature.

Agreed. But what about premium players? giving them privs only means that they can create in effect private games that they don't need to join.

Oh, and you haven't answered by previous question

[Optimus Prime]

No, rebel, you clearly don't hear me loud and clear.

Non-premium members are not supposed to have access to an unlimited number of private games. Plain and simple. If a non-premium wants to play in a tournament with one of their slots, they may do so, but that is not an "unlimited" number, it is finite until the tournament ends.

In-clan privileges for non-premium members would completely circumvent the whole point in having private games as a premium feature.

Agreed. But what about premium players? giving them privs only means that they can create in effect private games that they don't need to join.

Oh, and you haven't answered by previous question

Tournament privileges are FOR creating empty games. So tournament can be run, don't start down the road of nitpicking, yorkie, you know very well why they were created and why they work the way they do. Don't make yourself look stupid.

As for your previous post, Night Strike summed it all up pretty well.

[yorkiepeter]

Don't make yourself look stupid.

One knows when one is winning an argument when your opponent starts getting abusive

[Optimus Prime]

Don't make yourself look stupid.

One knows when one is winning an argument when your opponent starts getting abusive

Sorry, but you aren't winning the argument. I'll leave you alone now to dwell in your own personal thoughts about the subject because clearly talking to you has no effect anyhow.

[Lanceyboyuk]

No, rebel, you clearly don't hear me loud and clear.

Non-premium members are not supposed to have access to an unlimited number of private games. Plain and simple. If a non-premium wants to play in a tournament with one of their slots, they may do so, but that is not an "unlimited" number, it is finite until the tournament ends.

In-clan privileges for non-premium members would completely circumvent the whole point in having private games as a premium feature.

A fair point well made.

[hulmey]

The powers that be have made their mind. Its very disappointing but f*ck it!!!

[barbie]

I think it all makes sense, we can do what we want to do with a little extra work. I for one am not real computer savy so every time there is a new update and it messes with my monkey or bob, I am back to square one. Waiting for the kinks to be worked out is not a problem for me especially if it is going to be better for it. Bounty Hunters accepts everyone in their clan and we do have a lot of non-premium members but when doing tournaments I try to just have a bunch of subs to make up for that. I realize if you are a real competative clan you don't want to play with just anybody, but then again you don't usually take non-premiums so.
I am so impressed with how far this site has come in just two years having said that I think you all need to back off and let lack do what he thinks is best.