Conquer Club

Would you abort a down syndrome fetus?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post a reply

Would You Abort a Fetus Which Was Known to Have Down Syndrome?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby Snorri1234 on Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:20 am

Symmetry wrote:I think you tried to say that abortion should not become an accepted substitute for contraception. Abortion is, of course, birth control. Deciding on an abortion means that you control whether the birth happens or not.


Yeah I figured that's what she meant.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Top

Postby AlgyTaylor on Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:57 am

I'd leave the decision down to the mother ultimately. If I was asked my advice, I'd say you had to consider the baby's quality of life and her quality of life because of having an abortion/keeping the baby.

Ethically, from a societal point of view, I'd say that until the baby is cut from the umbilical cord it has no rights. Or certainly fewer rights than a fully developed cow.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK
Top

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:00 pm

Neoteny wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:it sounds crude and harsh, but, we humans are ruining natural selection and what made us what we are... :cry:

Bah. Natural selection is for fruit flies. We are above that now.

It's still there, just working on other traits than might be needed in a fictive Savannah that might never have existed in the first place. (Yes, though not a fan of Kitcher I'm critical of Sociobiology)
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Top

Postby Neoteny on Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:08 pm

MeDeFe wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:it sounds crude and harsh, but, we humans are ruining natural selection and what made us what we are... :cry:

Bah. Natural selection is for fruit flies. We are above that now.

It's still there, just working on other traits than might be needed in a fictive Savannah that might never have existed in the first place. (Yes, though not a fan of Kitcher I'm critical of Sociobiology)


Heh. You're right, natural selection is inescapable. I don't know about the whole savanna thing though...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Top

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:20 pm

Reference to a course I've been taking this term. We did a block on Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and whatnot, including the modular theory of mind and darwinian algorithms, cultural evolution, the basic stuff I guess.

One of the texts was by Kitcher, and imo he's far too polemical, at least his reasoning is sound.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Top

Postby Neoteny on Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:51 pm

MeDeFe wrote:Reference to a course I've been taking this term. We did a block on Sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and whatnot, including the modular theory of mind and darwinian algorithms, cultural evolution, the basic stuff I guess.

One of the texts was by Kitcher, and imo he's far too polemical, at least his reasoning is sound.


Well, just about everything related to Sociobiology could be considered polemical it seems...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Top

Postby unriggable on Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:14 pm

Bavarian Raven wrote:it sounds crude and harsh, but, we humans are ruining natural selection and what made us what we are... :cry:


Untrue. Thanks to C-Section, human babies with big heads (which carry that gene into adulthood) are able to live, instead of killing the mother during birth (and usually dying). More mutations into the gene pool.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Top

Postby Neoteny on Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:17 pm

unriggable wrote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:it sounds crude and harsh, but, we humans are ruining natural selection and what made us what we are... :cry:


Untrue. Thanks to C-Section, human babies with big heads (which carry that gene into adulthood) are able to live, instead of killing the mother during birth (and usually dying). More mutations into the gene pool.


Yeah, we aren't ruining it, we're messing around with it. I wouldn't say that's a bad thing in most cases. Antibiotics for example...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Top
Previous
Post a reply

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB