Moderator: Cartographers


try the solution below. the main thrust of the changes is to have a light brown 5-territory continent south of the river and reduce the number of territories north of the river.oaktown wrote:You now have:
• a large, 8 territory region with four borders that will take three more turns to hold than the five territory, three border region that nets the same bonus, and
• a five territory, five border region that will get absolutely pounded by its easier to capture and hold neighbors.
rename lanaudiere as laurentides.Gilles#1 wrote:Plse add Laurentides, and the correct name for La Baie is "SAGUENAY" (Saguenay is the principal city including La Baie and many others city)
expand louisville to reach the river, separating the newly-expanded mauricie from laurentides, and rename it as lanaudiere.Gilles#1 wrote:Nice change for region, but "Louiseville????
if we merge saint tite into mauricie at the same time as we do my suggested changes, then the border territories for the nunavik continent will reduce to 4: ur idea looks good.Gilles#1 wrote:Also St-Tite it's very small if you add Laurentide (large territory), make one territory with St-Tite in Mauricie.
I dont really understand this can you make a sketch or something on how you think it should look?iancanton wrote:try the solution below. the main thrust of the changes is to have a light brown 5-territory continent south of the river and reduce the number of territories north of the river.oaktown wrote:You now have:
• a large, 8 territory region with four borders that will take three more turns to hold than the five territory, three border region that nets the same bonus, and
• a five territory, five border region that will get absolutely pounded by its easier to capture and hold neighbors.
extend mauricie to the river (not bordering any bridges), separating quebec city from louisville, lanaudiere and montreal.
rename lanaudiere as laurentides.Gilles#1 wrote:Plse add Laurentides, and the correct name for La Baie is "SAGUENAY" (Saguenay is the principal city including La Baie and many others city)
rename la baie as saguenay.
move the monteregie bridge further upriver to the extreme south-west.
move montreal to the south side of the bridge, bordering monteregie and the bridge (monteregie will no longer border the bridge).
http://www.inforoutiere.qc.ca/images/fr ... tation.pdf
expand louisville to reach the river, separating the newly-expanded mauricie from laurentides, and rename it as lanaudiere.Gilles#1 wrote:Nice change for region, but "Louiseville????
add a montreal-sized territory on the north side of the bridge, bordering the montreal bridge, laurentides and lanaudiere (the old louisville), and call it laval.
add a territory to border monteregie and chaudiere (but not the river) and call it estrie.
rename saint laurent as bas saint laurent.
let montreal, monteregie, estrie, chaudiere and bas saint laurent be light brown (continent of 5 territories, of which 3 are border territories).
let outaouais, laurentides, laval, lanaudiere, mauricie, quebec city and charlevoix be dark brown (continent of 7 territories, of which 5 are border territories).
merge nunavik with fort mackenzie (part of riviere-koksoak, population zero, in 2006) and call it nunavik.
http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil0 ... earchPR=24
merge baie-james with nitchequon (population zero in 2001) and call it baie-james.
http://www.ottertooth.com/Native_K/nitchequon.htm
let the new nunavik territory, the new baie-james territory, manicouagan, saguenay, saint tite and abitibi be green (continent of 6 territories, of which 6 are border territories – u can reduce the borders by expanding saguenay so that baie-james no longer borders charlevoix).
ian.




