suggs wrote:who are you
your mum
Moderator: Community Team
Snorri1234 wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:no it doesnt, its factmuy_thaiguy wrote:Depends on how you look at it.sam_levi_11 wrote:oh the one war you still harp on about....geeze youd think youd change the record considering we have the best military history in the civilised world
Fact: in a little over 200 years, the US has been involved in what, 50 odd wars? And only 2 of them weren't straight up victories. Those being Korea (still not technically over) and Vietnam (you can thank the media for this one, lugging huge cameras out into the battlefield and making US troops easy targets for the Viet Cong).
Yeah, I'm sure vietnam was lost because of the media and not because of the fact the soldiers didn't actually know a lot about fighting in the jungle or that the leaders made bad decisions....
Also, you guys lost the Iraq war too.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Iraq is being won by the Petraeus-Odierno surge strategy.
reminisco wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Also, you guys lost the Iraq war too.
no we didn't. i specifically remember the ticker tape parade down Broadway in Manhattan, we all lauded Gen. Schwarzkopf for a job well done!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Fruitcake wrote:Funny thing I have noticed.
The topic I put up was So what does it mean to be British
The thread has turned into a discussion about the merits of American war history.
Funny thing really, as quite often, that is actually what it is to be British.
reminisco wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:Iraq is being won by the Petraeus-Odierno surge strategy.
what, you mean the brilliant and novel idea of sending enough fucking troops to get the job done?
Gen. Shinseki was saying that back in motherfucking 2003. don't be such a Bush Administration cheerleader.
hell, even little old ME said we needed to send 500,000 troops to take Iraq. it was in a paper i wrote in college, as a net assessment of an invasion of Iraq for the purpose of staging protracted conflict with Iran, the real threat to US interests.
and i wrote that in 2001. if this wasn't an interweb forum, and actually counted for something, i could prove that.
of course, proving that doesn't accomplish much, except to prove that i'm smarter than the administration, and at least as smart as the Joint Chiefs were before Bush dismantled the brains at the Pentagon.
Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
reminisco wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.
reminisco wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.
got tonkaed wrote:reminisco wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.
Im going to assume you were being clever here because im pretty sure napoleon would argue it doesnt.
If you werent being clever, your use of analogies leaves a smidge to be desired.
got tonkaed wrote:reminisco wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Hang on then, so the Dixie Flag represents slavery. Right....despite it being the star-and-stripes under which slave ships always sailed?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Guiscard wrote:Queueing.
Balsiefen wrote:Little Britain wrote:Britain, Britain, Britain. Everybody is welcome in Britain. We are open 'til six. No foreign gentlemen please
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap