Casino Royale- tournament based around casino's and
and so on with all films but each one has a twist:
for example in casino royale, everybody gets put in triples except one of the triple is actually a liar (mathis in casino royale).
I would require more people to be willing to mod. And I need some help with twists etc. So who's up for it?
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
max is gr8 wrote:Casino Royale- tournament based around casino's and
and so on with all films but each one has a twist:
for example in casino royale, everybody gets put in triples except one of the triple is actually a liar (mathis in casino royale).
I would require more people to be willing to mod. And I need some help with twists etc. So who's up for it?
that sounds dicy... very dicy... because youd be asking someone in the triples team to sabatoge themselves and purposely lose points, very few players would be down with that... im willing to help whare i can, but the premus of this paticular one i dont see working too well
unless they were singles games where there was one person on each team that was actually for the other, i.e. once a team is eliminated they play amongst selves for points.
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
You would probably get at least some players if you do it which the tripple concept. But you won't get many i think. Becuase not many is willing to join games where there might be a player to work against you to lose, rather than work with you to win.
But still, it's an intresting concept and you would probably be able to make it as a tournament with success.
Secret Alliances/Throwing Games/Sabotaging are all probably not the best things to be incorporating into new tournaments. We like to keep the tournaments in line with the site rules, and having someone assigned to work against a team they are a member of just seems to be a little too close to the edge for my comfort.
Optimus Prime wrote:Secret Alliances/Throwing Games/Sabotaging are all probably not the best things to be incorporating into new tournaments. We like to keep the tournaments in line with the site rules, and having someone assigned to work against a team they are a member of just seems to be a little too close to the edge for my comfort.
Damn, secret alliances were involved in my next planned tourney never mind (I'll run it privately)
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
Optimus Prime wrote:Secret Alliances/Throwing Games/Sabotaging are all probably not the best things to be incorporating into new tournaments. We like to keep the tournaments in line with the site rules, and having someone assigned to work against a team they are a member of just seems to be a little too close to the edge for my comfort.
Damn, secret alliances were involved in my next planned tourney never mind (I'll run it privately)
I am pretty sure that secret alliances are against the rules, regardless of whether it is a tournament or not.....
Optimus Prime wrote:Secret Alliances/Throwing Games/Sabotaging are all probably not the best things to be incorporating into new tournaments. We like to keep the tournaments in line with the site rules, and having someone assigned to work against a team they are a member of just seems to be a little too close to the edge for my comfort.
Damn, secret alliances were involved in my next planned tourney never mind (I'll run it privately)
I am pretty sure that secret alliances are against the rules, regardless of whether it is a tournament or not.....
max is gr8 wrote:What if all players agree to secret alliances?
If you announced it in the game chat and everybody agreed then I think you could.
But if you don't you take the chances of some idiot telling on you.
true, but as long as he does that, its posted in the game chat, and in the tournament, but also make sure that OP, nightstrike and/or steelhorse all know of this so that should something arise they can vouch for the ligitamacy
