Moderator: Community Team
He makes a valid point though!MOBAJOBG wrote:I just can't accept your whining in a long post.
She.hulmey wrote:He makes a valid point though!MOBAJOBG wrote:I just can't accept your whining in a long post.
Ok, I don't have any qualms about it now since you're a female. So, do take care and don't let your emotions get the best of you over a simple matter.Luvr wrote:She.hulmey wrote:He makes a valid point though!MOBAJOBG wrote:I just can't accept your whining in a long post.
And if you don't like it then why bother reading and replying? Good lord
Hehe I agree with you and I understand how there's unwritten rules of play and such. My post is more or less a reminder that these things are unwritten/unspoken and some people take longer than others to learn these things, don't have time to look beyond what's there (don't bother with the forums etc.) and still others even if they know, just don't care. As long as it's a public game you could run into these people and I think it'd be more enjoyable if some people realized this and maybe helped those people along (or not, cause it's not your responsibility to teach but if you don't then be prepared for those people to not learn)jiminski wrote:You are right in sooo many ways Luvr! (maybe all ways)... However i have found myself castigating others for 'stupid' or 'less cultured' moves.
the problem is that there are so many accepted, stylised modes of play which fall into the bracket of unspoken rules. It is sadly inevitable in a place where information and learning become public property. We do by definition have our own little sub-culture; with nuances/codes of behaviour, pecking orders and ritualised gaming practices.
Now that makes it all rather too serious, i completely agree and it does remove a great deal of the fun of the game and replaces it with something slightly deeper. As such this silly-site moves into the realm of more than the niche which games and fun have traditionally occupied in human existence.
Sadly this site and sites like it begin to occupy territories previously occupied by other less fickle pursuits and becomes a microcosm of life... in some cases it becomes life.
That sounds very perverse and it is, but i hope it does go some way to explaining why many members are so anal when it comes to these very unimportant things.
Let's be honest your score here is completely unimportant compared to codes of behaviour; kindness, generosity etc. But for the reasons outlined above and due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.
A little like when you see your demure, lovable, kind and passive friend transform into a raging, foul-mouthed, maniac behind the wheel of the safe, protected territory of their car.
We need more love in our little world!
love jim
Luvr wrote:Hehe I agree with you and I understand how there's unwritten rules of play and such. My post is more or less a reminder that these things are unwritten/unspoken and some people take longer than others to learn these things, don't have time to look beyond what's there (don't bother with the forums etc.) and still others even if they know, just don't care. As long as it's a public game you could run into these people and I think it'd be more enjoyable if some people realized this and maybe helped those people along (or not, cause it's not your responsibility to teach but if you don't then be prepared for those people to not learn)jiminski wrote:You are right in sooo many ways Luvr! (maybe all ways)... However i have found myself castigating others for 'stupid' or 'less cultured' moves.
the problem is that there are so many accepted, stylised modes of play which fall into the bracket of unspoken rules. It is sadly inevitable in a place where information and learning become public property. We do by definition have our own little sub-culture; with nuances/codes of behaviour, pecking orders and ritualised gaming practices.
Now that makes it all rather too serious, i completely agree and it does remove a great deal of the fun of the game and replaces it with something slightly deeper. As such this silly-site moves into the realm of more than the niche which games and fun have traditionally occupied in human existence.
Sadly this site and sites like it begin to occupy territories previously occupied by other less fickle pursuits and becomes a microcosm of life... in some cases it becomes life.
That sounds very perverse and it is, but i hope it does go some way to explaining why many members are so anal when it comes to these very unimportant things.
Let's be honest your score here is completely unimportant compared to codes of behaviour; kindness, generosity etc. But for the reasons outlined above and due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.
A little like when you see your demure, lovable, kind and passive friend transform into a raging, foul-mouthed, maniac behind the wheel of the safe, protected territory of their car.
We need more love in our little world!
love jim
And besides, there's a difference between constructive criticism and going completely off the wall
firth4eva wrote:I don't care whether I'm against a higher or lower rank. If you do a stupid move I will tell you. It's just usually lower ranks that do it.
jiminski wrote:Let's be honest your score here is completely unimportant compared to codes of behaviour; kindness, generosity etc. But for the reasons outlined above and due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.
Indeed, things such as rank are of absolutely no importance are they Seulessliathan....that's why you eschew the plethora of self congratulatory, mutual backslapping threads, full of self serving platitudes, congratulating players on their promotions while the peasants in the lower ranks press their snotty noses up to the window wishing they could be like you, eh old chap......Seulessliathan wrote:i agree with Luvr and jim, nothing more to say

Twill wrote:The real challenge is not anticipating what the colonel will do, but rather what the cook will do.
You can plan for someone with a strategy, but not for someone who blindly attacks making the poor player a more dangerous opponent.
The mark of a good player is that they can plan for, adjust to and beat someone who has absolutely no strategy...and do it with dignity and grace. These are things which are sadly lacking in some of our higher ranked players me thinks.
But yes, I do agree with you, it's a pain when you play a diva, be they high ranked or low ranked.
Have a diva free day
Twill

The fact of the matter is that this is the only thing most high rankers are good at. My mates are always calling me a nerd/geek (which im not) for spending so much time on the clan and CC. Most of the time I spend on CC is when im workingFruitcake wrote:jiminski wrote:Let's be honest your score here is completely unimportant compared to codes of behaviour; kindness, generosity etc. But for the reasons outlined above and due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.Indeed, things such as rank are of absolutely no importance are they Seulessliathan....that's why you eschew the plethora of self congratulatory, mutual backslapping threads, full of self serving platitudes, congratulating players on their promotions while the peasants in the lower ranks press their snotty noses up to the window wishing they could be like you, eh old chap......Seulessliathan wrote:i agree with Luvr and jim, nothing more to say
Oh hey guys, I heard you were all looking for me?jiminski wrote:due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

i don´t see the problem fruit, jim said there are more important things than score and i agreed, nevertheless some people have goals here and they are happy if the reach this goals. Is it bad to congratulate in this case? Where did i wrote something which sounds like self serving plattudes?Fruitcake wrote:jiminski wrote:Let's be honest your score here is completely unimportant compared to codes of behaviour; kindness, generosity etc. But for the reasons outlined above and due to the 'anonymity' which the username persona offers, people often become quite unpleasant; exhibiting characteristics outside of their normal behaviours.Indeed, things such as rank are of absolutely no importance are they Seulessliathan....that's why you eschew the plethora of self congratulatory, mutual backslapping threads, full of self serving platitudes, congratulating players on their promotions while the peasants in the lower ranks press their snotty noses up to the window wishing they could be like you, eh old chap......Seulessliathan wrote:i agree with Luvr and jim, nothing more to say