Moderator: Community Team
ahunda wrote:I have one complaint though: Since positive ratings for Team-Play were obviously automatically translated into "Good Teammate" tags, I have now several of those tags from people, that I never was on a team with. I didn´t understand, why those people were allowed to give me a Team-Play Rating anyway. It´s kind of stupid ...
retrocrush wrote:I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Optimus Prime wrote:retrocrush wrote:I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Seriously? You complain about the system and then go straight for abusing it? You aren't proving a point, you do realize that, right? All you are doing is making yourself look immature. If you don't like the tags, don't use them. If you don't like the ratings, don't use them. It really is that simple. Nobody is forcing you to do anything on this site you don't want to.
pissedoffsol wrote:@attendence
is this calculated going backwards too?
I KNOW i've deadbeated a few speed games and have missed some turns....
yet i show
Attendance:
100% of turns taken
Night Strike wrote:pissedoffsol wrote:@attendence
is this calculated going backwards too?
I KNOW i've deadbeated a few speed games and have missed some turns....
yet i show
Attendance:
100% of turns taken
You've taken enough turns to be 99.5%, which would round up to 100%.
Optimus Prime wrote:retrocrush wrote:I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Seriously? You complain about the system and then go straight for abusing it? You aren't proving a point, you do realize that, right? All you are doing is making yourself look immature. If you don't like the tags, don't use them. If you don't like the ratings, don't use them. It really is that simple. Nobody is forcing you to do anything on this site you don't want to.
hulmey wrote:i doubt its correct at all. DomQuebec deadbeats all his gameswhen he is losing and has 98% which must be incorrect!
Night Strike wrote:hulmey wrote:i doubt its correct at all. DomQuebec deadbeats all his gameswhen he is losing and has 98% which must be incorrect!
hulmey, do the math. Even if he does skip turns while losing, that is a max of 3 turns for a game that is at least more than 5 turns along. In some games, only 1 or no turns are missed. Playing over 2300 games and winning 50% of them means it's going to take a WHOLE lot of missed turns to actually change the stat by 1%. With that many games with many rounds in each game, being at only 98% IS a lot of missed turns.
Also, OP can defend CC if he wants just how you choose to attack it all the time. He was pointing out how the player purposefully used the tags in a way that they were not meant to be used. And if you're going to complain about the new system that "has been forced upon us", why have you left 122 ratings?
retrocrush wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:retrocrush wrote:I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Seriously? You complain about the system and then go straight for abusing it? You aren't proving a point, you do realize that, right? All you are doing is making yourself look immature. If you don't like the tags, don't use them. If you don't like the ratings, don't use them. It really is that simple. Nobody is forcing you to do anything on this site you don't want to.
I just think it's funny as hell that it allows you to put in contradicting tags. Lighten up. It's crazy that we're adding all of these options to make the feedback more detailed, when you could just flip the switch back to the old feedback system and have it all.
hulmey wrote:there are work arounds and the system could have been tweaked. But hey they made the choicand now they have to leave with it. If people want to complain thats there right and choice.
Not every company makes the right choices, but the excellent company recognizes the wrong choices and trys to do it all it can to make things as best they can for both parties!
The revised rating system is a step in the right direction but still let people complain if they want to
Ditocoaf wrote:hulmey wrote:there are work arounds and the system could have been tweaked. But hey they made the choicand now they have to leave with it. If people want to complain thats there right and choice.
Not every company makes the right choices, but the excellent company recognizes the wrong choices and trys to do it all it can to make things as best they can for both parties!
The revised rating system is a step in the right direction but still let people complain if they want to
I think they are letting people complain... that's what you're doing, aren't you? And you're right; it's a good thing that they are. Because those initial complaints are what helped this flawed new system take a step in the right direction. Hopefully it'll keep improving, as the site has since it started.
hulmey wrote:opinions are like farts, every1 has one
Optimus Prime wrote:retrocrush wrote:I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Seriously? You complain about the system and then go straight for abusing it? You aren't proving a point, you do realize that, right?
[...]
maique wrote:So suggestions for goin back to feedback:
- Response to feedback should also be editable for the same 5(?) days after which, like feedback, it can only be removed >> prevents further and recurrent abuse**
If you are going to have it be "editable" for 5 days, should the rating appear in those 5 days, or should it remain hidden like the original rating does?
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users