Moderator: Community Team
lol, awsome chip, whats mine???chipv wrote:I've just been running through some last tests on a new stat in Map Rank which measures relative rank of defeated opponents.
The results are surprising.
I thought I'd like to see people's predictions before making this available out of interest...
So who are the worst offenders at n00b farming?

Joodoo wrote:obviously KLOBBER

Glad I got the ball rolling on this one Chip- I'm interested to know as well. Rabbit has to be one of them I would think. Err- 8 man public freestyle prolly has brought my average down too I bet.hwhrhett wrote:lol, awsome chip, whats mine???chipv wrote:I've just been running through some last tests on a new stat in Map Rank which measures relative rank of defeated opponents.
The results are surprising.
I thought I'd like to see people's predictions before making this available out of interest...
So who are the worst offenders at n00b farming?
As far as I'm concerned, I'd be happy if no Cooks or Chocolate Bars ever joined an 8 man game. They do more damage than anything- 3 points isn't worth the headaches. I'm sure I'll be called an elitist for this comment- it is what it is.chipv wrote:This thread has been made for a number of reasons aside from idle curiosity.
I think this is probably going to be one of the most unpopular statistics, having run this on a lot of people.
The numbers don't lie but some genuinely excellent top players will always suffer from always having to play
lower ranks, so I'm still thinking about how to shield this.
It's actually ready to go but I'm still a bit dubious about how it will be used...
All the other threads are crap, this is going to be the best one to date! I'm guessing we'll see at least half of the top 50 listed, go get 'm!chipv wrote:This thread has been made for a number of reasons aside from idle curiosity.
I think this is probably going to be one of the most unpopular statistics, having run this on a lot of people.
The numbers don't lie but some genuinely excellent top players will always suffer from always having to play
lower ranks, so I'm still thinking about how to shield this.
It's actually ready to go but I'm still a bit dubious about how it will be used...
Is target rank your own rank? If it is, I'm bound to have a terrible strength ratio.chipv wrote:So Strength ratio = ratio of average rank of defeated opponents / target rank at game end time.
Stealing Spiderman quotes lolScott-Land wrote:With great power comes great responsibility...... *Eagerly awaiting for Chip to press the Nuke button.*
Just release it already chipv!! - very curious to see whether my personal assertion that I play a fair number of high ranked players is actually true!poo-maker wrote:*eagerly awaits the new update*
JR, torcav, rabbiton, King_herpes, Klobber and maxatstuy are probably the worst offenders
I did have a quick look over scotts proposal thread.
Is target rank your own rank? If it is, I'm bound to have a terrible strength ratio.chipv wrote:So Strength ratio = ratio of average rank of defeated opponents / target rank at game end time.

Yes, I had you in mind when I posted earlier when I checked your score (it's not that bad).poo-maker wrote:*eagerly awaits the new update*
JR, torcav, rabbiton, King_herpes, Klobber and maxatstuy are probably the worst offenders
I did have a quick look over scotts proposal thread.
Is target rank your own rank? If it is, I'm bound to have a terrible strength ratio.chipv wrote:So Strength ratio = ratio of average rank of defeated opponents / target rank at game end time.
I see... Thanks for the quick reply.chipv wrote:Yes, I had you in mind when I posted earlier when I checked your score (it's not that bad).poo-maker wrote:*eagerly awaits the new update*
JR, torcav, rabbiton, King_herpes, Klobber and maxatstuy are probably the worst offenders
I did have a quick look over scotts proposal thread.
Is target rank your own rank? If it is, I'm bound to have a terrible strength ratio.chipv wrote:So Strength ratio = ratio of average rank of defeated opponents / target rank at game end time.
Tricky to solve - everyone is a lower rank than you so you are right!
But this was not always the case. The calculations measure the relative rank at game time.
I'll think of something for you.
