The classy conquerer

[comic boy]

As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Well thats what you get when you awaken the wild beast!! Ive never had any problem with you or played a match against you and/or even mentioned your name in a thread!! Coz ive attacked scot-land's persona you've jumped on me!! Anyways your thoughts dont matter me and i think thats vice-versa....

Have a toasty one comic boy

Err I jumped on you because you accused me of lacking sportsmanship and class which seems odd as you have just conceeded that you have never played or associated with me - basicly you simply insulted me for posting in Scotts defence !!!!!.

[comic boy]

As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Look who's talking you hypocrit.

Im not sure if you actually know what the word means but if indeed you do then please point out which part of my post was hypocritical

[wrestler1ump]

As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Look who's talking you hypocrit.

Im not sure if you actually know what the word means but if indeed you do then please point out which part of my post was hypocritical

I've highlighted the specific points, so that you can follow along easily.

[hulmey]

As Courtney said why on earth are you making such a big deal about this, Ive been fighting with Scott since the days I was a Lowly Lt and he certainly hasn't held it against me. The guy is a very good player but fiercely competitive and prone to outbursts as in fact many of the elite are, perhaps thats why the other top players dont have a problem with him

Theres something called sportsmanship and class. And you also seem to be lacking in those quarters! If i saw you and scot-land on the rugby field , id rip you both a new arsehole!

Yes its very classy to make threats on the net
As for the sportsmanship I think I will happily put up my perfect rating / zero neg feedbacks
plus the opinion of the majority of my opponents ( including I think the originator of this thread ) against the biased and ill informed rant of a mediocre player and universally despised nobody.

Look who's talking you hypocrit.

Im not sure if you actually know what the word means but if indeed you do then please point out which part of my post was hypocritical

Emmm, you started on me in another thread about scot-land. YOu defend him to the hilt which is admirable but will hardly make you many friends!

Ps....i admire all those who are ranked above me for their determination and skills in getting there in this very hard game! Qualities i do not admire, are arrogance,bullying and poor sportsmanship....

[dividedbyzero]

I've highlighted the specific points, so that you can follow along easily.

Actually, that wasn't a threat, so it wasn't really hypocritical. It was actually a sort of "cement block in a kid glove" approach to diplomacy.

Taking on Comic Boy is a bit of a stretch. I've played doubles against him and Hatchman a number of times and they are both pretty decent sorts. I think you might be hard pressed to find anyone else to say he's anything but a class act. Even when he's insulting someone, it's so darn British and classy that Courtney swoons.

[Simon Viavant]

How has this lasted almost 2 and a half hours without being moved or locked?

[dividedbyzero]

How has this lasted almost 2 and a half hours without being moved or locked?

My mere presence gave it so much class that it got to stay open.

[Scott-Land]

Yet again our leader shows his class. His word means so much more than any single player on this site.

Perish the thought that you might have a valid arguement, or he might be wrong. You certainly won't get an apology, he's way too big a man to apologise. The foe list is an easier option.

look at game 2990737 for another classy performance from Scott-land.

Apologize for what? You hung 2 players in the 5 games we've played. I said you hung 3...what a huge exaggeration on my behalf. You got pissed because I called you a noob jokingly- I should had said dipshit. My sincere apologies...


Ex-Conquerer so all your jealousy fits can end now.

[clapper011]

should I merge all the threads about scott? especially the ones in flame wars?

[comic boy]

Whump
Well I think you have proved conclusively that you absolutely do not know what the term hypocrite means, honestly I had more confidence in the Canadian remedial education service

[Scott-Land]

should I merge all the threads about scott? especially the ones in flame wars?

Yeah send my Congrats one over there as well- Wump and Hulmey should've gotten at least warnings for their posts.

[codeblue1018]

Can someone please explain to me why it is every time Whump makes a reply to a post regardless of which forum it is in, it always turns to be a flame on him?, I love it; keep it coming Whump - you are the reason why I visit the forums. Priceless!

[KoE_Sirius]

Not another thread with you guys flirting...Enough of the fore-play..When's the wedding ?

[hulmey]

should I merge all the threads about scott? especially the ones in flame wars?

Yeah send my Congrats one over there as well- Wump and Hulmey should've gotten at least warnings for their posts.

You should get a medal for sportsmanship. I nice gold one, so that its really heavy and your neck starts to bend downwards a little. That way you might squeeze your head through the door

[FabledIntegral]

These threads are always entertaining...

[steve066]

those who think this thread is valueless/pointless can simply stop reading/posting to it.
the point of the thread is scott's ongoing claim that wayne hung players 3 times in 5 games.
yet the game #'s he cites show nothing of the sort. one game showing wayne winning and scott saying good game, the other showing a diferent player doing hanging.scott you made claim that you couldn't support factually.
then you belittle and bluster when i said your evidence was not evidence of anything. you began to attack me
personally. then comic called wayne's arguments nonsense which was nonsensical for him to do as it flew in the face
of facts. to gang up like that on wayne was a classical bullying tactic that does not speak well of comic.
scott for you to persist in claiming something that you cannot support is baffling.
no matter how many times you claim something
no matter how loudly or condescendingly you say it it doesn't make it true.
its quite ironic in fact that you took s america back on your turn only to have comic break it again on his turn,
the exact same thing you noobed and foed wayne for.
but you never said a word to him about it. u only said something to the effect that you were sure comics moves were wise.
how is it that when 2 players make exact same move on you one (your friend) doesn't get a blink and the other get foed?
that sure seems inconsistent and hypocritical.
we've been friends for a while but i think i've made the fatal mistake of disagreeing with you.
so i'm afraid i'm no longer eligible,
i think i should add that scott has mentored me , advised and critiqued my games for months.
all for only a thank you. i'm very grateful to scott for his truly generous, selfless help
but scott i wont stand by when you bully someone.
i've always felt that if people dont stand together against bullies they will surely stand alone.

link http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=2990737


steve066

why was this locked?

[waynemgough]

Yet again our leader shows his class. His word means so much more than any single player on this site.

Perish the thought that you might have a valid arguement, or he might be wrong. You certainly won't get an apology, he's way too big a man to apologise. The foe list is an easier option.

look at game 2990737 for another classy performance from Scott-land.

Apologize for what? You hung 2 players in the 5 games we've played. I said you hung 3...what a huge exaggeration on my behalf. You got pissed because I called you a noob jokingly- I should had said dipshit. My sincere apologies...


Ex-Conquerer so all your jealousy fits can end now.

No i didn't get pissed because you called me noob. I was surprised you didn't understand why i broke your bonus.

Now i'm starting to think you're quite clearly a dipshit. You stated that i had hanged YOU 3 times in our games(learn to read your own drivel, boy). I havn't hanged you once. And the only time i hanged anybody resulted in your only win against me. Your deluded short-sightedness is becoming quite apparent though.

How many people have you hanged in our games?

This isn't about your name calling and if you had a shread of intelligence you'd realise that! You stick to playing your "friends" in freestyle games mate. As i really don't rate you at seq esc, although i do appreciate your points and will miss them.

Also, can't you ask the doctor for some help with the claringly obvious "small man syndrome" you suffer from?

[Scott-Land]

Ok- I'm a bit drunky atm Steve, not sure if it's me or your post but I'm having a hard time reading it.

Anyway here goes- I'll try to hit the key points, and please don't bother me anymore.

yet the game #'s he cites show nothing of the sort. one game showing wayne winning and scott saying good game

Can you not hang someone and still win the game- Steve? What does me saying 'gg' have to do with anything? The game below is the game you're referring to?

# 2894372- the same game Haha screwed up. Yes two birds with one stone. He left me with 8 armies in Ural, 2 in Yakusk, 1 each in Siberia, Alaska and Irkusk. I said 14 armies in chat, EXCUSE ME- are you gonna complain that was wrong too? I don't have a 3 card set and Hahaa wins and I don't have to deal with 2 idiotic fucking threads.

The point of the comment Steve, was that Wayne is an habitual hanger. Obviously dice can't be the reason for 2 hangings out of 5 games and countless others too. Ever notice he was never invited to my games? Only normally joined after me....yada yada.

I said he hung me 3 times-- CORRECTION, HE HUNG AT LEAST 2 DIFFERENT PEOPLE IN THE 5 GAMES WE'VE PLAYED! FFS-

its quite ironic in fact that you took s america back on your turn only to have comic break it again on his turn,
the exact same thing you noobed and foed wayne for.
but you never said a word to him about it. u only said something to the effect that you were sure comics moves were wise.
how is it that when 2 players make exact same move on you one (your friend) doesn't get a blink and the other get foed?
that sure seems inconsistent and hypocritical.

As I said in chat, I'm not gonna explain to you nor do I have to on why or why not I didn't say anything to Comic. I expected both breaks on SA when I originally took it in the 1st and 2nd round as I only had 3 defending my borders. I said " Wayne-you noob" to Wayne as a joke as you can see what I said afterwards- " ... a new threads gonna be made now" (No fucking shit- another thread) I only put him on ignore because unlike he, LHahaa and countless others, if someone goes on about something I don't care to hear, instead of arguing a countless point, I put them on ignore for the duration of the game, it saves the lineup from having to deal with yammering. I don't have to run to GD and post.

Hypocritical- you say ?

You can't compare my behavior to either one of them or Comic and Wayne; as one is far inferior than the other. Even if Comic did something I didn't understand (which he has and I too), I will always question it no matter the player. Don't come running to me because I didn't treat 2 players the same on two separate plays- of which you think is the same. Of which I was kidding to one. Perhaps Comic knows how aggressive I am with a bonus, that's a huge edge for me or perhaps Wayne just broke it because it was a bonus and he's a noob? As the play stands now, Comic still has position in SA as Wayne doesn't... Who the f*ck knows, I certainly don't care.

I only answered when you ran your mouth- for future reference Steve, mind your own god damn business.

[waynemgough]

Ok- I'm a bit drunky atm Steve, not sure if it's me or your post but I'm having a hard time reading it.

Anyway here goes- I'll try to hit the key points, and please don't bother me anymore.

yet the game #'s he cites show nothing of the sort. one game showing wayne winning and scott saying good game

Can you not hang someone and still win the game- Steve? What does me saying 'gg' have to do with anything? The game below is the game you're referring to?

# 2894372- the same game Haha screwed up. Yes two birds with one stone. He left me with 8 armies in Ural, 2 in Yakusk, 1 each in Siberia, Alaska and Irkusk. I said 14 armies in chat, EXCUSE ME- are you gonna complain that was wrong too? I don't have a 3 card set and Hahaa wins and I don't have to deal with 2 idiotic fucking threads.

The point of the comment Steve, was that Wayne is an habitual hanger. Obviously dice can't be the reason for 2 hangings out of 5 games and countless others too. Ever notice he was never invited to my games? Only normally joined after me....yada yada.

I said he hung me 3 times-- CORRECTION, HE HUNG AT LEAST 2 DIFFERENT PEOPLE IN THE 5 GAMES WE'VE PLAYED! FFS-

its quite ironic in fact that you took s america back on your turn only to have comic break it again on his turn,
the exact same thing you noobed and foed wayne for.
but you never said a word to him about it. u only said something to the effect that you were sure comics moves were wise.
how is it that when 2 players make exact same move on you one (your friend) doesn't get a blink and the other get foed?
that sure seems inconsistent and hypocritical.

As I said in chat, I'm not gonna explain to you nor do I have to on why or why not I didn't say anything to Comic. I expected both breaks on SA when I originally took it in the 1st and 2nd round as I only had 3 defending my borders. I said " Wayne-you noob" to Wayne as a joke as you can see what I said afterwards- " ... a new threads gonna be made now" (No fucking shit- another thread) I only put him on ignore because unlike he, LHahaa and countless others, if someone goes on about something I don't care to hear, instead of arguing a countless point, I put them on ignore for the duration of the game, it saves the lineup from having to deal with yammering. I don't have to run to GD and post.

Hypocritical- you say ?

You can't compare my behavior to either one of them or Comic and Wayne; as one is far inferior than the other. Even if Comic did something I didn't understand (which he has and I too), I will always question it no matter the player. Don't come running to me because I didn't treat 2 players the same on two separate plays- of which you think is the same. Of which I was kidding to one. Perhaps Comic knows how aggressive I am with a bonus, that's a huge edge for me or perhaps Wayne just broke it because it was a bonus and he's a noob? As the play stands now, Comic still has position in SA as Wayne doesn't... Who the f*ck knows, I certainly don't care.

I only answered when you ran your mouth- for future reference Steve, mind your own god damn business.

What you failed to mention was that i had forted your armies with 9, i was ahead in the card count and had 35 territories. That was a deliberate move, which paid off.

You have also sent me an invite to your games in a pm specifically to me(shall i post it?), but at that time i wasn't playing anymore seq esc. i try to keep my seq esc games under 10 and already had my quota.

Now please, stop this nonsense. We're all grown ups here (i think) and this hole you're digging could very well fit your inflated cranium, if you carry on.

A simple "sorry Wayne i was wrong" will suffice. Be a man for once in your life!

[Sentinel XIV]

should I merge all the threads about scott? especially the ones in flame wars?

I don't think my computer could handle opening that thread.

[comic boy]

Steve
I would also like you to mind your own business, unbeknown to you before I made the comment you quoted I had already spoken to Wayne during another game and I have also discussed it with him by PM. He hasnt got a problem with me so I wonder why you have, perhaps its because I recently got bored with your constant wittering and told you to shut up. Getting on a high horse,when in fact you are simply trying to settle a score, says much about you but what else would I expect of somebody who has barely played a move in the last 6 months without somebodys else pulling the strings. The irony of this is that whilst I am happy to play with Wayne in the future you will certainly not be getting any more invites

[Scott-Land]

In all fairness, I don't advise Steve anywhere near I did when he made the big climb to General; by my choice for the reason you stated above- Comic. Of late it's been on occasion concerning extremely difficult turns.

[Georgerx7di]

I understand that you had your feeling hurt in this game... Making a thread is not going to help though. If you would have went to him privately maybe it could have been handled better.

On CC we teach more than risk, we teach life lessons. "Conquerclub helped me finish High school," one player said. "For me CC was a way out," another said. It's thanks to hoties like happy2 that CC is such a success. Please donate to CC now, you could help a starving child in Eritrea.




This message has been complete bullshit, TM.

[lordhaha]

After reading various threads, there seems to be a common factor - I.E. Scott-lands outbursts - and Comic boys backing-up of Scott-land. So if Scott-land learned to control his mouth and Comic stopped being a lap dog these threads should no longer be needed. Alas due to pig headedness, I do not think this will happen. So I shall just have to simply and happily sit on both their Foe lists.

BTW Wayne/Steve it takes a man to apologize so I would not be holding my breath

[Blitzaholic]

I am starting to get a little jealous here, I mean scott-land is becoming more controversial or popular than jr or even myself now



all have there viewpoints, perceive it sorta like poker--do you like mike the mouth matasow?, some do, some dont, but the boy can play some poker



I have played my fair share with comic boy and scott-land, i respect them both a lot as players, and yes they both have barked at me in the past as well, and me back, its just the competition is all, try not to personalize it, its war on the battlefield, but you have to admit they are perhaps 2 of the greatest dozen or so skilled players on the site, and no I am not licking azz, lol, just giving my opinion based from my experiences with them. scott-land self admits he is negative at times, all that know of him, know this, he can have an attitude, i am not necessarily defending him, I guess I can identify as I have been there myself at times, but I am going to try to change some and grow from my fits of rage, but this is not going to change overnight, it's a process, and I have a character flaw of impulsiveness coupled with impatience.