Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:[adv. idea]
lovely looking map cairns
foregone wrote:May just be me but the seas are kinda looking like territories at the moment. They seem raised and the colour/texture/something gives it a feel of conquerability rather than water.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Think they should be dark?
foregone wrote:Seas much better in my opinion.
whitestazn88 wrote:seas look good. but i was wondering... why are italy and france neutral starts, but ottoman europe isnt?
Incandenza wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:seas look good. but i was wondering... why are italy and france neutral starts, but ottoman europe isnt?
'cause the former are 1-terit continents, whereas the latter is a 2-terit continent.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Incandenza wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:seas look good. but i was wondering... why are italy and france neutral starts, but ottoman europe isnt?
'cause the former are 1-terit continents, whereas the latter is a 2-terit continent.
What if Italy and France together counted as a +1?
Juan_Bottom wrote:Adding a port there(was there one? a makshift one?) might also take care of the problem. But I would prefer to keep the map as accurate historically as you can...
Cdkutusu wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:Adding a port there(was there one? a makshift one?) might also take care of the problem. But I would prefer to keep the map as accurate historically as you can...
In Gelibolu? Maybe, not sure though... But there was a huge battle there, Allies tried to push through the Straits towards Black See.
So that would be accurate
Juan_Bottom wrote:Cdkutusu wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:Adding a port there(was there one? a makshift one?) might also take care of the problem. But I would prefer to keep the map as accurate historically as you can...
In Gelibolu? Maybe, not sure though... But there was a huge battle there, Allies tried to push through the Straits towards Black See.
So that would be accurate
No on the Italian-French border. Each of those are worth +1, and start nuetral. But with a port, or by combining them into a single "continent" for a +1 you would have to start them as nuetral.
I'd bet Gelibolu turns into a huge battle as is....
Juan_Bottom wrote:I like it and don't want it gone... but!..
Doesn't it give an overwhelming advantage to anyone who can take and hold the south of the map?
cairnswk wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:I like it and don't want it gone... but!..
Doesn't it give an overwhelming advantage to anyone who can take and hold the south of the map?
yes, you're probably correct...so what about if i had a one wya attack from Bursa also to Gelibolu....that would allow that area to be fortified by someonw looking top hold the turkish side.
Juan_Bottom wrote:I will say, maybe...
With all the smaller and eaiser to hold bonuses to the south, that one way looks deadly. If someone gets stuck trying to capture the North, that little +1 is going to be their only bonus. But someone in the South with a +3 should be able to take it pretty easily.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users