Accused: Powercrazy & Xcalibur54 [cleared]

[Xcalibur54]

Nice ad hominen dano. You never cease to amaze.

Neon Peon, who are you? Someone else who can't possibly fathom the notion that someone might have played Risk and other strategy games before joining this site? You two are both incredibly dense.

[The Neon Peon]

I will say to you what I said to Commander Eric:

I am not trashing anyone, I just find it suspicious, and overly so because I had a friend be busted with 4 accounts, all of them noobs, and not able to play here again.

So, that king of makes me weary of new accounts that are a little too odd for comfort. The accounts my friend had were: leon w otis, hi_i_am_bob, mo42, and another I do not remember right now. Will check my gmail chats with him later today and add the fourth in once I find out who it was.

Okay? And as for who am I? I am just some guy that comes here for the fun of the game. And doing background searches on people I play (and those I do not), to see if they are doing anything suspicious gives me a warm fuzzy feeling inside, and it is fun.

[Powercrazy]

This is such a joke. You realize that the "hunters" or whoever can check IP addresses easilly. They will immediately see that I'm in North Carolina, and X is in Texas. End of "investigation."

If you are going to cry cheat at least wait until you finish the game. If we are both the same person that is no reason you can't beat the one guy is it? If you play us and beat us, and your accusations are true, great. If they are false all you did was deprive us from playing more games together.

X had 4 concurrent games going, and rather than wait on you to finish throwing your temper tantrum, it would be great if we could play some other games.

Also I love how you said that even if we weren't multi's we would still be on your foe list, because you "don't like cheaters." Well obviously if we aren't cheaters and we are still on your foe list, it must be something else. Hmmm, maybe you are just a sore loser?

[danodukebb]

If i were a sore loser I would have foe'd every single person i'd lost to and that would be quite a long list, almost as long as whestler1ump...don't know who he is? well look him up, you guys probably have a lot in common...

I would still have you on my foe list so I don't have to play with people who bitch about being searched, if you have nothing to hide then just let it happen and shut up

I'm just calling it as I see it

[Powercrazy]

I would still have you on my foe list so I don't have to play with people who bitch about being searched, if you have nothing to hide then just let it happen and shut up

I'm just calling it as I see it

I'm bitching about you stalling a game because you were losing. I don't care if you report me, just keep playing the damn game, thats what we are here for isn't it?

Also tangently related, but did you go to duke and are you in the North Carolina area? If so then I could show you personally that we aren't the same person.

[danodukebb]

umm no i didnt go to duke...yes i live close....

no i'm not meeting you anywhere on the chance you're a serial rapist

[Powercrazy]

umm no i didnt go to duke...yes i live close....

no i'm not meeting you anywhere on the chance you're a serial rapist

that's fine, but why were you stalling?

[danodukebb]

i told you i wanted to see if htis thit got taien care of...i forgot you have only 4 amgames at once i am soryr

[lancehoch]

Guys, why does it seem like I need to say this in every other thread lately. Please remain on topic or you will be getting a PM warning. On topic means only bringing forth evidence as to whether or not powercrazy and xcalibur54 are cheating.

[The Neon Peon]

On looking this over again, the wins on complex maps seem suspicious, but why would a multi team up with himself? I think it would be easier for him to ply on both teams and sabotage the other one.

Any thoughts on that one danodukebb?

[Powercrazy]

Guys, why does it seem like I need to say this in every other thread lately. Please remain on topic or you will be getting a PM warning. On topic means only bringing forth evidence as to whether or not powercrazy and xcalibur54 are cheating.

The off topic chatter is a consequence of the flimsy "evidence" of the accusation. There is no evidence to bring forth, so what do you expect?

[The Neon Peon]

No, the off topic came from the thing about asking whether any of us went to Duke. And we have evidence enough for this to be looked into, so stop freaking posting the same thing over and over again!

I am tired of hearing it.

[Powercrazy]

No, the off topic came from the thing about asking whether any of us went to Duke. And we have evidence enough for this to be looked into, so stop freaking posting the same thing over and over again!

Your posting is awful similiar to dans. I think you might be a multi.

Do I have enough evidence yet?

[danodukebb]

haha they know we aren't multies idiot, they've already ran checks on me because I was accused...

[Xcalibur54]

Do you normally make it a habit of permanently adding people to your foe list immediately after accusing them of cheating, without even waiting for the investigation to take place?

Also, is being a douchebag a bannable offense? Because if it is, I think you've just won the prize.

[The Neon Peon]

If you wish to make a report against us, feel free to do so. I will answer any questions you have about filling out the form, but until that time, do not make me get a warning as well as you for keeping this thread off topic.

[danodukebb]

Do you normally make it a habit of permanently adding people to your foe list immediately after accusing them of cheating, without even waiting for the investigation to take place?

Also, is being a douchebag a bannable offense? Because if it is, I think you've just won the prize.

off topic kid...keep the insults to yourself

[king achilles]

Xcalibur54 and Powercrazy have different data = cleared of being multis with each other.