Moderator: Community Team

 apey
				apey
			










 
		

 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			

 apey
				apey
			










 
		apey wrote:I thought you didn't believe in god


 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			hecter wrote:apey wrote:I thought you didn't believe in god
Google doesn't require faith, as I know it exists. I have seen it with mine own eyes, and asked it questions with mine own fingers.



 DAZMCFC
				DAZMCFC
			







 
		
 gdeangel
				gdeangel
			








 
		gdeangel wrote:While we are discussing Google vs. God, I challenge you to run and obscure search and go leaving through the pages. You will find on page 1, that there are numbers like 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 on the bottom of your results, implying that you have many many pages of results. Go through them all. You will be surprised what you find.
Google is a joke.


 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

 pimpdave
				pimpdave
			






 
			pimpdave wrote:http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/


 InkL0sed
				InkL0sed
			










 
			InkL0sed wrote:pimpdave wrote:http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
Thank you for almost being on topic...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

 pimpdave
				pimpdave
			






 
			pimpdave wrote:InkL0sed wrote:pimpdave wrote:http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
Thank you for almost being on topic...
Google Chrome means something different?
I am confused.
Please share your views.


 InkL0sed
				InkL0sed
			










 
			jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

 pimpdave
				pimpdave
			






 
			
 Matroshka
				Matroshka
			




 
		Matroshka wrote:I got it as soon as it became available today.
I like it so far. I read through most of the comic and they have some good ideas. It seems quicker than Firefox 3.0 and much quicker than IE 7. When plugins or add-ons like greasemonkey (hopefully) become available for Chrome, I just may use it as my default browser.
One thing I do not like about Chrome though is the blue color scheme, but I would assume this will be modifiable in the future.


 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			hecter wrote:Matroshka wrote:I got it as soon as it became available today.
I like it so far. I read through most of the comic and they have some good ideas. It seems quicker than Firefox 3.0 and much quicker than IE 7. When plugins or add-ons like greasemonkey (hopefully) become available for Chrome, I just may use it as my default browser.
One thing I do not like about Chrome though is the blue color scheme, but I would assume this will be modifiable in the future.
It's open source so it's modifiable now if you have the technical knowhow.


 Matroshka
				Matroshka
			




 
		Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

 Fircoal
				Fircoal
			




















 
		

 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			

 daydream
				daydream
			












 
		daydream wrote:i would be very interested in people sharing their experences with google chrome...

 jiminski
				jiminski
			















 
		Oh dear, so it's not compatible with 70% of the internet then?jiminski wrote:it is not good for streaming artistic Internet videos.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

 Dancing Mustard
				Dancing Mustard
			
 
		Dancing Mustard wrote:Oh dear, so it's not compatible with 70% of the internet then?jiminski wrote:it is not good for streaming artistic Internet videos.

 jiminski
				jiminski
			















 
		
 Nickbaldwin
				Nickbaldwin
			

 
		jiminski wrote:daydream wrote:i would be very interested in people sharing their experences with google chrome...
not good... i think it may be a little top-heavy.. and or they need to get compatibility fixed .. In short, it is not good for streaming artistic Internet videos. It is very jerky, completely ruining the visual experience.


 daydream
				daydream
			












 
		Nickbaldwin wrote:Hasn't worked for me at all so far.

 jiminski
				jiminski
			















 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users