Moderator: Community Team
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.





		
		Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









		



		Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis










		DaGip wrote:Can't you actually press charges for something like that?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

		


















		DaGip wrote:Can't you actually press charges for something like that?












		william18 wrote:The parents of the guy can sue every single family, by pressing charges for police obstruction. Plus their are tons of witnesses, and the jury would be disgusted, so there should be almost no threat of dead kids parents losing.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

		Dancing Mustard wrote:william18 wrote:The parents of the guy can sue every single family, by pressing charges for police obstruction. Plus their are tons of witnesses, and the jury would be disgusted, so there should be almost no threat of dead kids parents losing.
So, they'd privately sue them in the civil courts, for a tort that doesn't exist, then there would inexplicably be a jury in that courtroom despite it being a civil action not based around slander or defamation?
In the future I will be calling you Lord Justice William18 of the Bailey, QC.
Facetiousness aside: You have seriously muddled a load of random legal terminology there. This really would be best suited to being kept as a criminal matter (aidding and abetting / inciting a suicide) and while a civil action could be launched by the family (i.e. the family could 'sue')it wouldn't be based around obstructing the police, as that wouldn't give them a good/feasible cause of action and it would be hard for them to quantify 'damages' at the end. In other words, they'd sue for completely different reasons, as your original idea would be a really shit way of going about a civil action in this instance.


		Dancing Mustard wrote:william18 wrote:The parents of the guy can sue every single family, by pressing charges for police obstruction. Plus their are tons of witnesses, and the jury would be disgusted, so there should be almost no threat of dead kids parents losing.
So, they'd privately sue them in the civil courts, for a tort that doesn't exist, then there would inexplicably be a jury in that courtroom despite it being a civil action not based around slander or defamation?
In the future I will be calling you Lord Justice William18 of the Bailey, QC.












		william18 wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:william18 wrote:The parents of the guy can sue every single family, by pressing charges for police obstruction. Plus their are tons of witnesses, and the jury would be disgusted, so there should be almost no threat of dead kids parents losing.
So, they'd privately sue them in the civil courts, for a tort that doesn't exist, then there would inexplicably be a jury in that courtroom despite it being a civil action not based around slander or defamation?
In the future I will be calling you Lord Justice William18 of the Bailey, QC.
Thank you for the title, Sir Mustard.
Anyway, I assume your system is much different, which is why it didn't make any sense.













			hecter wrote:william18 wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:william18 wrote:The parents of the guy can sue every single family, by pressing charges for police obstruction. Plus their are tons of witnesses, and the jury would be disgusted, so there should be almost no threat of dead kids parents losing.
So, they'd privately sue them in the civil courts, for a tort that doesn't exist, then there would inexplicably be a jury in that courtroom despite it being a civil action not based around slander or defamation?
In the future I will be calling you Lord Justice William18 of the Bailey, QC.
Thank you for the title, Sir Mustard.
Anyway, I assume your system is much different, which is why it didn't make any sense.
It made a lot of sense actually... Why would civilians be able to sue for damages not related to them (being police obstruction)?












		sam_levi_11 wrote:wtf kind of thing is that, if someone did that to me id be so sad of the state of affairs in the world, id jump too. Although jumping off a high place is not my ideal of how to kill ones self.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









		jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







			

		pimpdave wrote:This happens in NYC on occasion. Not to that degree, but the occasional passerby will shout, "jump", to someone on the ledge. It's pretty well documented.
I can't recall every hearing about a gang of shitheads yelling at a victim though. Usually they would be dragged away by an officer on the ground, or told to shut the f*ck up by a bystander. That's why they seem to do it as they walk past the scene. Most New Yorkers just don't even care though. Just go on about their business.
Sad that happened. The kids that yelled are assholes and I hope they get their comeuppance soon.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.









		pimpdave wrote:This happens in NYC on occasion. Not to that degree, but the occasional passerby will shout, "jump", to someone on the ledge. It's pretty well documented.
I can't recall every hearing about a gang of shitheads yelling at a victim though. Usually they would be dragged away by an officer on the ground, or told to shut the f*ck up by a bystander. That's why they seem to do it as they walk past the scene. Most New Yorkers just don't even care though. Just go on about their business.
Sad that happened. The kids that yelled are assholes and I hope they get their comeuppance soon.



















			Ditocoaf wrote:Ugh... more signs of people being really, really stupid, which truly is the source of all horrible cruelty in the world.
The full story, that Fox seems to be getting its story from, is here.
One interesting quote: "'He was the joker and smiled all the time. He was so funny and everyone knew him because he was so popular." Were these kids the sort that felt oppressed by the "popular" people?
strike wolf wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:wtf kind of thing is that, if someone did that to me id be so sad of the state of affairs in the world, id jump too. Although jumping off a high place is not my ideal of how to kill ones self.
I wouldn't have jumped but I would have gone down there and beaten the out of everyone there who tried to tell me to.




		Nobody was likely to be arrested as a result of the abuse directed at Shaun,









			sam_levi_11 wrote:, im not ashamed to say there were times in my past where i contemplated it and was close to doing it,























		



		sam_levi_11 wrote:well i still think about it but i dont contemplate doing it, but it crosses my mind sometimes.





			

		Users browsing this forum: shreyabranwen1