Moderator: Cartographers
stringybeany wrote:Very nice job!
In case no one has yet mentioned (very long thread), "oxon" is still listed as "oxfordshire" in the xml.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
_big_easy_ wrote:Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?
Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.
And you wonder why you're losing members....
RjBeals wrote:_big_easy_ wrote:Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?
Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.
And you wonder why you're losing members....
I think overall more users like the revamp over the original.
There's the nostalgia thing to get over, but the old one got many many complaints on how hard it was to tell borders.
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time
AndyDufresne wrote:Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
LED ZEPPELINER wrote:honestly, when i first started playing the revamp i was like "AWESOME" but then there were the bugs and i didn't like it but now i really like it
lgoasklucyl wrote:Not that it matters all that much- but I would just like to phone my two cents in and say that I love how the map looks now. British Isles was the first map I learned after Classic and it therefore remains in my top three maps of all time. Though I didn't have a problem with the other version, I love the new version in every way. Not until I saw this work of art did I realize how outdated and messy the original truly was.
Thanks for making one of my favorite maps even better
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
rtgs wrote:The new British isles map is not good for me.
The colors are worse than the ORIGINAL British isles (too pale for my taste),
The names are changed and harder to remember,
The boundaries of the territories are more fragmented,...
Maybe everything is more correct and more technically better, but ...
... I URGE YOU TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL MAP
saaimen wrote:rtgs wrote:The new British isles map is not good for me.
The colors are worse than the ORIGINAL British isles (too pale for my taste),
The names are changed and harder to remember,
The boundaries of the territories are more fragmented,...
Maybe everything is more correct and more technically better, but ...
... I URGE YOU TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL MAP
I hate it when people post things like this. They shouldn't. Maybe this topic can be closed?
The revamp is really, really good, gimil. Thank you, well done.
_big_easy_ wrote:saaimen wrote:rtgs wrote:The new British isles map is not good for me.
The colors are worse than the ORIGINAL British isles (too pale for my taste),
The names are changed and harder to remember,
The boundaries of the territories are more fragmented,...
Maybe everything is more correct and more technically better, but ...
... I URGE YOU TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL MAP
I hate it when people post things like this. They shouldn't. Maybe this topic can be closed?
The revamp is really, really good, gimil. Thank you, well done.
Yeah, how dare someone have an opinion that differs from yours. What arrogance!
_big_easy_ wrote:Yeah, how dare someone have an opinion that differs from yours. What arrogance!
That's a whole other thing thanPerfect CC'er wrote:gimil, I know you've been working hard on this map, and I respect your work. But in fact, I liked the old map better.
rtgs wrote:... I URGE YOU TO RETURN THE ORIGINAL MAP
_big_easy_ wrote:Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?
Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.
And you wonder why you're losing members....
yeti_c wrote:_big_easy_ wrote:Why Revamp a map that had nothing wrong with it?
Jesus, guys, you don't have to constantly fool with EVERYTHING.
And you wonder why you're losing members....
Mainly because the original map was a geographical nightmare full of mistakes.
C.
ManBungalow wrote:I agree that the name in the drop-down list should come up as "Oxen/Oxfordshire" to make it clearer.
midor wrote:It's a new version of a map that already existed. In other words something familiar with new info. So, yes, I did not read the legend because I'd played it many times before as I didn't realize that there was that change.
How about an apology for that insult.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users