Moderator: Community Team
m and b are pretty close to each other, so maybe it should've been a billion. Still, it's less than the banks are costing everyone.GabonX wrote:A million dollars doesn't sound like much if the return is an effective asteroid defense system. You would think it would cost more...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
There's two of you now, aye?Janey Rockets wrote:So: Live large, not long.
Jane
I always wondered if it was a typo. They wen't before the UN this past year to ask for funding.MeDeFe wrote:m and b are pretty close to each other, so maybe it should've been a billion. Still, it's less than the banks are costing everyone.
A 100 trillion isn't a lot of money to protect THE PLANET. I mean, c'mon, give them the money.GabonX wrote:A million dollars doesn't sound like much if the return is an effective asteroid defense system. You would think it would cost more...
First they'll need to do a 50-million-dollar, two-year environmental impact study.Juan_Bottom wrote:A 100 trillion isn't a lot of money to protect THE PLANET. I mean, c'mon, give them the money.
THE ARMY wrote:nope, we can't die yet, still have 3 years to go
You make reference to 2012...then you state that a near miss from an asteroid is "actually" scary. It seems that you were being sarcastic about 2012.THE ARMY wrote:wow that is actually really scary, like seriously scary
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
The easiest thing to do is go to YouTube and search for 2012...look for videos on polar shift or pole shift.HapSmo19 wrote:Where's the link to these 'scientific facts'?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
I agree wholly, as I often do, with Frigidus here.Frigidus wrote:I'm personally about as concerned over the 2012 destruction of the world as I've been about every predicted apocalypse the last 1000 years. That is, not at all. Our destruction will likely come at our own hands, and I highly doubt anyone could predict the year it happens (outside of sheer luck), let alone the month.
Sounds legit... and our poles are shifting. Sounds interesting.... I'm a space case anyway. Thanks for the tip, I'll be looking into it.TheProwler wrote:This one (below) shows a segment from a TV show that touches on it...but it leaves out the information that our solar system, which kinda vibrates or cycles up and down on the gravitational plane of the black hole in the center of our galaxy, is passing through the plane over the next few years and is therefore more likely to be bombarded by objects that are caught in the gravitational pull of the black hole's gravitational plane. We are passing through an area where there is a lot of asteroid traffic, if you want to think of it that way.