autoload's 19 Player Mafia Game #1 --- Day 1 ---

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:10 am

wicked wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:lets just kill wicked because she's funnier when she's dead.

Kill?? or lynch, RK? BIIIIG difference! little slip there, eh mafioso?

No theres not.. lynching is a way of killing someone, for example later in this game when I'm talking to my mafia buddies I'll probably say lets lynch... and they wont say, "omgwtfbbq, was that a townie slip"

Oh and Cram I havent voted because we've got time and i'm not sure wicked dunnit.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:12 am

yes there is a difference. townies lynch, mafia kill. maybe it's an innocent mistake, I don't know.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:12 am

reverend_kyle wrote: later in this game when I'm talking to my mafia buddies

QFE

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:13 am

I'm cool with whatever the lynching decision is, as long as we lynch someone. On day 1 there are fewer important townies than mafia. So odds are good that we wont lose anybody key. And, even if we do. We still gain the info on knowing who voted to do it and why. The only people who gain from a No Lynch is mafia.

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:14 am

wicked wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote: later in this game when I'm talking to my mafia buddies
QFE

vote reverend kyle

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:16 am

senfive has got the motive: revenge.

but wicked was the first one in this thread to present the revenge theory, which lead me to believe she could be framing him.

so i'll keep my vote where it is. senfive is emotional, but is he THAT emotional?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:18 am

Nyvek wrote:
wicked wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote: later in this game when I'm talking to my mafia buddies
QFE
vote reverend kyle

FYI, I was kidding to mock how ridiculous I found wicked saying because I said that I was mafia was.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:18 am

Nyvek wrote:I'm cool with whatever the lynching decision is, as long as we lynch someone. On day 1 there are fewer important townies than mafia. So odds are good that we wont lose anybody key. And, even if we do. We still gain the info on knowing who voted to do it and why. The only people who gain from a No Lynch is mafia.

Ny, that really sounds like mafia. Not saying you are, but we lost a previous game b/c the townies were all acting like mafia. Mafia don't benefit from a no lynch, they want people lynched to get rid of townies faster. And saying you're lynching just to lynch is a huge red flag. I'm thinking this may just be your noobness to the game though, which is the only reason I'm not voting for you after that statement.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:21 am

supercram wrote:senfive has got the motive: revenge.

but wicked was the first one in this thread to present the revenge theory, which lead me to believe she could be framing him.

if I was framing him, I would've Voted already and been pushing that vote. as I already said, I want to wait to hear what he says, if/when he logs on.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:23 am

wicked wrote: if I was framing him, I would've Voted already and been pushing that vote.

no you wouldn't. that would make it WAY too obvious. you're a far cleverer player than that. tut tut. having patience doesn't make you innocent.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:24 am

supercram wrote:
wicked wrote: if I was framing him, I would've Voted already and been pushing that vote.
no you wouldn't. that would make it WAY too obvious. you're a far cleverer player than that. tut tut. having patience doesn't make you innocent.

Sort of the reason I haven't been pushing the vote for wicked

but you have

omgzzz mafia!!

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:25 am

wicked wrote:
Nyvek wrote:I'm cool with whatever the lynching decision is, as long as we lynch someone. On day 1 there are fewer important townies than mafia. So odds are good that we wont lose anybody key. And, even if we do. We still gain the info on knowing who voted to do it and why. The only people who gain from a No Lynch is mafia.
Ny, that really sounds like mafia. Not saying you are, but we lost a previous game b/c the townies were all acting like mafia. Mafia don't benefit from a no lynch, they want people lynched to get rid of townies faster. And saying you're lynching just to lynch is a huge red flag. I'm thinking this may just be your noobness to the game though, which is the only reason I'm not voting for you after that statement.

Well, look at the straight numbers. No Lynch= 1 dead townie, unless the doc gets lucky. Lynch = 1 or 2 dead townies and 0 or 1 dead mafia. If you exaggerated the equation to never lynch, mafia would win 100%.

But right now I'm sold on RK's slip. It might be a joke, but its currently the closest thing I've found to mafia behavior.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:25 am

i'm not pushing the vote! i'm floating a theory.

i was only pointing out that for all your "kill wicked" talk, you hadn't voted. i thought maybe you were f'ing up as usual.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:26 am

^^ response to RK

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:27 am

i would like to know who these people are:

11. onbekende – x
13. Kokunai – x

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:29 am

in fact, FOS onbekende and kokunai

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:30 am

we're all floating theories cram, it's what we do. float and watch.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:31 am

supercram wrote:in fact, FOS onbekende and kokunai

oooh, that'll scare 'em!

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:31 am

Well, we currently have 18 people, so it takes alot to lynch. "Hammering" is a mafia tactic of holding your vote till on of us gets close to lynching, then piling on with your partners in crime. So, not currently voting till the "time is right," could be construed as scummy hehavior as well.

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:32 am

supercram wrote:i would like to know who these people are:

11. onbekende – x
13. Kokunai – x

Clueless

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:33 am

we call that bandwagonning. i don't usually like to vote until everyone has at least spoken once.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:36 am

sidenote: does anyone want to throw a risk game to me real quick? i'm 12 points away from making Major.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:39 am

I would but you're 12 not 30.. and that would get rid of my hat.

Nyvek · Post by **Nyvek** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:44 am

supercram wrote:sidenote: does anyone want to throw a risk game to me real quick? i'm 12 points away from making Major.

FOS Supercram for secret alliance.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:45 am

supercram wrote:sidenote: does anyone want to throw a risk game to me real quick? i'm 12 points away from making Major.

no, I was so close to being a major, then I lost all the way back to a Lueintant. IN 3 days. GRrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Anyway, back to the mafia game, Supercram your making some good points against, Wicked, maybe she is framing Senfive.
So,

Unvote: Supercram
FOS: Wicked, Supercram