INTRODUCTION:
Because the atheist proved himself to be incapable of apprehending the 8 points in the previous thread, I have simplified it for him, and presented a similar set of facts, this time distilled into 2 points.
As an unbiased party, I am faced with the following two contradictory world-views:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The Theists understand that God is the Original Archetype, or source, for all observable phenomena, He is infinitely complete with eternal life of His own, and He possesses both personal and impersonal characteristics, as well as love, eternally. This is a logically sound account for life, for love, and for both personal and impersonal observable phenomena.
2. The atheist believes that God is not the original personal archetype. Instead, the atheist attributes this role, using varying semantic constructs, to "the universe." Unfortunately, the universe that the atheist claims supposedly gave rise to life, love, and personal characteristics was, according to the atheist, supposedly devoid of all these phenomena at some unspecified time that he theorizes is prior to the hypothetical advent of such phenomena. The atheist's claim is logically unsound when it comes to accounting for clearly observable life, clearly observable love, and clearly observable personal phenomena.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, the Theists' world-view is logically superior to that of the atheist, and any truly unbiased and logically savvy party must necessarily accept this fact. Lack of scriptural or logical refutation shows acceptance by any and all who post in this thread.
