Moderator: Community Team

It was originally inspired by the ""Why was the "is god homosexual" thread locked?""daddy1gringo wrote:Maybe against my better judgment, I'll nibble at the bait here. But first, did you start the thread so you could make that joke, or was the joke an afterthought, and there's actually a chance for serious discussion here? 'Cause if it's #1, I'll save both you and me our time.

For a season.demonfork wrote: Is "sin" supposed to feel good?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
A natural consequence of being promiscuous AND eating monkeys that carry the disease.pimpdave wrote:For a season.demonfork wrote: Is "sin" supposed to feel good?
But the scriptures also say that the wages of sin are death. (If I'm remembering sunday school properly)
This is why people so often think that AIDS is a "gay disease".
But I tend to think that AIDS is just a natural consequence to being promiscuous. The gay part is ancillary to the lots of boning part.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
This is true for Christianity in general. I am sure there are some who consider even just being homosexual a sin, but they are few and the rest of us are sure the Bible is only talking about actions (which we can control), not feelings (which we cannot always control).thegreekdog wrote:I may be wrong about this, but pursuant to Catholic Church teachings, homosexuality is not a sin; rather, engaging in the act of homosexual sex is a sin.
As is often the case, I propose a whole different way of looking at it. What everyone has said so far, as is usually the case in these discussions, presupposes that some people just "are" homosexual, they are born that way. That is far from proven. I personally know several people, and know of many more, who used to be homosexual and are not anymore. What we are sexually attracted to or aroused by is partly conditioned.thegreekdog wrote:I may be wrong about this, but pursuant to Catholic Church teachings, homosexuality is not a sin; rather, engaging in the act of homosexual sex is a sin.
That would depend on the congregation and the Priest/Bishop giving the Mass. Not I saying I agree one way or another, but that is the way it is.thegreekdog wrote:I may be wrong about this, but pursuant to Catholic Church teachings, homosexuality is not a sin; rather, engaging in the act of homosexual sex is a sin.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
So much of your face was written by the ulterior motives of men.TheProwler wrote:So much of the Bible was written to satisfy the ulterior motives of men.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
You need a new hobby.pimpdave wrote:So much of your face was written by the ulterior motives of men.TheProwler wrote:So much of the Bible was written to satisfy the ulterior motives of men.
HAHA
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
"I don't like the way he looks at my ass, he must be a sinner."TheProwler wrote:I think a better questions is "What was the motivation behind men writing that God considers homosexuality a sin?"
So much of the Bible was written to satisfy the ulterior motives of men.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The basic problem is that kids raised by homosexual parents are no more likely to be homosexual than those born to heterosexual parents. The only thing that changes is that they tend to have fewer problems with being homosexual, which is to be expected.daddy1gringo wrote:As is often the case, I propose a whole different way of looking at it. What everyone has said so far, as is usually the case in these discussions, presupposes that some people just "are" homosexual, they are born that way. That is far from proven. I personally know several people, and know of many more, who used to be homosexual and are not anymore. What we are sexually attracted to or aroused by is partly conditioned.thegreekdog wrote:I may be wrong about this, but pursuant to Catholic Church teachings, homosexuality is not a sin; rather, engaging in the act of homosexual sex is a sin.
Usually I would say, as most evangelicals do, that we are not sinners because we sin, we sin because we are sinners. But in this case, I think "being a homosexual" is not the sin, but just a result of it. God wouldn't make you something and then blame you for being what He made you.
My ten year old son says stuff like pimpdave does... I think that my son is immature in some ways. Please tell me that pimp dave is younger than 10.TheProwler wrote:You need a new hobby.pimpdave wrote:So much of your face was written by the ulterior motives of men.TheProwler wrote:So much of the Bible was written to satisfy the ulterior motives of men.
HAHA
He does that all the time.daddy1gringo wrote: God wouldn't make you something and then blame you for being what He made you.
Looks like pimp and you son are wise in the same ways.captain.crazy wrote:My ten year old son says stuff like pimpdave does... I think that my son is immature in some ways. Please tell me that pimp dave is younger than 10.TheProwler wrote:You need a new hobby.pimpdave wrote:So much of your face was written by the ulterior motives of men.TheProwler wrote:So much of the Bible was written to satisfy the ulterior motives of men.
HAHA
jonesthecurl wrote:He did it to Satan, surely?
