Moderator: Community Team
Probably just no moderators around at the moment. But there's really no doubt that saxitoxin will have been removed by the time I get up in the morning.Fruitcake wrote:So this aimless and inane thread continues, Clappers point of law is ignored by the OP.
Why hasn't this thread been locked?
Agreed. Woodruff's flame-baiting was far over the top long ago and the thread should have been locked down once he came in and took over, as he tends to do with all threads.lord voldemort wrote:what i find hilarious...is that not one mod has locked this or done anything about it...
its a little bit pathetic
Too funny. And lovo, check the first post, who's name is that in green I hear you wonder.saxitoxin wrote:Agreed. Woodruff's flame-baiting was far over the top long ago and the thread should have been locked down once he came in and took over, as he tends to do with all threads.lord voldemort wrote:what i find hilarious...is that not one mod has locked this or done anything about it...
its a little bit pathetic
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Woodruff wrote:Clearly, my calling you a liar was accurate. The player Woodsie has completed one game and made no posts...and the one game was nearly three years ago.saxitoxin wrote:Reported for flaming; "liar" is incendiary.
BTW, Woodruff - I was not talking about you, I was talking about player Woodsie. So, please, mind your own business.
Him & Colton24azezzo wrote:Woodruff wrote:Clearly, my calling you a liar was accurate. The player Woodsie has completed one game and made no posts...and the one game was nearly three years ago.saxitoxin wrote:Reported for flaming; "liar" is incendiary.
BTW, Woodruff - I was not talking about you, I was talking about player Woodsie. So, please, mind your own business.
as much as i enjoy seeing woodruff get messed with, I would be surprised to find out that saxitoxin isnt a multi, hmmmm.
Ah, another unwritten rule.clapper011 wrote: uh..hello! major problem with this is simply that there is NO pornography in any context permitted on conquer club.
It's clearly stated in the community guidelines.Snorri1234 wrote:Ah, another unwritten rule.clapper011 wrote: uh..hello! major problem with this is simply that there is NO pornography in any context permitted on conquer club.
Here. And also it can be considered common sense.Woodruff wrote:It's clearly stated in the community guidelines.Snorri1234 wrote:Ah, another unwritten rule.clapper011 wrote: uh..hello! major problem with this is simply that there is NO pornography in any context permitted on conquer club.
Holy shit on an auto-erotic stimulation device! It is!Woodruff wrote:It's clearly stated in the community guidelines.Snorri1234 wrote:Ah, another unwritten rule.clapper011 wrote: uh..hello! major problem with this is simply that there is NO pornography in any context permitted on conquer club.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Careful there, MeDeFe. <chuckle>MeDeFe wrote:Holy shit on an auto-erotic stimulation device! It is!Woodruff wrote:It's clearly stated in the community guidelines.Snorri1234 wrote:Ah, another unwritten rule.clapper011 wrote: uh..hello! major problem with this is simply that there is NO pornography in any context permitted on conquer club.
