Moderator: Community Team

It matters little Mr C. Being the Aristos we are gives us carte blanche to take opposite views even in the same sentence and be correct on both counts.Mr Changsha wrote:Shit! We better get our stories straight Fc! There are cracks in the aristocracy!
The seething masses will arise!!!!!
Fruitcake wrote:It matters little Mr C. Being the Aristos we are gives us carte blanche to take opposite views even in the same sentence and be correct on both counts.Mr Changsha wrote:Shit! We better get our stories straight Fc! There are cracks in the aristocracy!
The seething masses will arise!!!!!

Just you wait.Fruitcake wrote:Indeed, in points one could consider you poor. Whether this is a social cc statement you are trying to make or you are just inept, incompetent and untalented at the game I could not tell...especially as you don't figure on my radar.Supermarioluigi wrote:Are you saying I'm poor?joecoolfrog wrote:I have found that poor players like to emphasise the luck factor and downplay the amount of skill required ,wonder whySupermarioluigi wrote:CC is 50% luck, 50% skill, and 50% $25.joecoolfrog wrote:Bad players should expect to be discriminated against, they deserve no respect
You can't discriminate against someone because they lack luck.
(but if they lack the skill, by all means, discriminate)

Assassin, freestyle doodle player talks of strategy?biteme143 wrote:I feel that lower players are discriminated, because higher players think they are the shit for their rank. And mostly its the type of games you the team you have the work you put in for that score. In team games luck is very low for winning that game, strategy overrides more in a team game. But I agree with the OP post that Higher ranks can say any shit they want and have more support from other players that are high in the ranks as well. I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so. Anyway I agree with OP that high ranks think they are better than others because of rank. If I played this online game up to the point I had 6000 games, maybe I can say bad things to other players as well.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?biteme143 wrote:I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

Mr Changsha wrote:Assassin, freestyle doodle player talks of strategy?biteme143 wrote:I feel that lower players are discriminated, because higher players think they are the shit for their rank. And mostly its the type of games you the team you have the work you put in for that score. In team games luck is very low for winning that game, strategy overrides more in a team game. But I agree with the OP post that Higher ranks can say any shit they want and have more support from other players that are high in the ranks as well. I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so. Anyway I agree with OP that high ranks think they are better than others because of rank. If I played this online game up to the point I had 6000 games, maybe I can say bad things to other players as well.
I always assumed you chaps were blind on gin and just pressed buttons randomly...
Sounds made up.biteme143 wrote:Dude I play assassin on my free time, I have a team that I play with in triples. So I know strategy and plus not that this matters, I have been on this site since pretty much around when this site opened up. You assumed to much by looking at my game logs. I have been playing with the same triples team for a while we play around 4 to 5 games at a time I allowed to play other games, and I enjoy the rush of Doodle earth assassin oh and also I don't care about points im here for fun not to be on some virtual number one board.
Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.Timminz wrote:And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?biteme143 wrote:I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.
Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.
So does your name.King_Herpes wrote:Sounds made up.biteme143 wrote:Dude I play assassin on my free time, I have a team that I play with in triples. So I know strategy and plus not that this matters, I have been on this site since pretty much around when this site opened up. You assumed to much by looking at my game logs. I have been playing with the same triples team for a while we play around 4 to 5 games at a time I allowed to play other games, and I enjoy the rush of Doodle earth assassin oh and also I don't care about points im here for fun not to be on some virtual number one board.
Yes, I was stuck somewhere between shock and amusement. I was trying to avoid it as she seems quite sensitive and I don't want her harassed, but: Game 5287267.chipv wrote:This is too funny to ignore - can you post the game number please, I haven't laughed this much in ages.
That was a chipv thing to say.chipv wrote:So does your name.
chipv wrote:King_Herpes wrote:Sounds made up.biteme143 wrote:Dude I play assassin on my free time, I have a team that I play with in triples. So I know strategy and plus not that this matters, I have been on this site since pretty much around when this site opened up. You assumed to much by looking at my game logs. I have been playing with the same triples team for a while we play around 4 to 5 games at a time I allowed to play other games, and I enjoy the rush of Doodle earth assassin oh and also I don't care about points im here for fun not to be on some virtual number one board.
biteme143 wrote: Case A to this OP, King Herpes thinks he is the shit because he is number one. Yeah he has skill, but he also has over 6000 games over him for experience. Maybe if I can get this many games under belt I can be as narcissistic as him?
King_Herpes wrote:biteme143 wrote: Case A to this OP, King Herpes thinks he is the shit because he is number one. Yeah he has skill, but he also has over 6000 games over him for experience. Maybe if I can get this many games under belt I can be as narcissistic as him?
Wouldn't count on it sugar tits.
Are you going to smite him?King_Herpes wrote:Blasphemy!

Outrageous, how dare you.King_Herpes wrote:That was a chipv thing to say.chipv wrote:So does your name.