Moderator: Cartographers

 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		 whitestazn88
				whitestazn88
			













 
			
 shakeycat
				shakeycat
			


















 
		
 Kotaro
				Kotaro
			

























 
		
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		 )
 )
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		iceco wrote:I got a negative mail (disclaimer prohibits me posting it,)
Anyway, I just planned on using the names of towns, not catch any pokémon or anything. Which makes me think they can't really prohibit me from using things like "Viridian" instead of "Viridian City" as the former isn't copyrighted (it's a colour pigment) and they could only invoke 'possibility of confusion', which won't work as this has a completely different context as the pokémon games (plus, they'd need an attorney, which they won't bother with, especially since they are wrong).



 barterer2002
				barterer2002
			

























 
			Kotaro wrote:You can't just use images, maps, ideas without saying the word and avoid copyright. All images, basic ideas, everything to do with poke'mon, is copyrighted.
iceco wrote:I got a negative mail (disclaimer prohibits me posting it,)
Anyway, I just planned on using the names of towns, not catch any pokémon or anything. Which makes me think they can't really prohibit me from using things like "Viridian" instead of "Viridian City" as the former isn't copyrighted (it's a colour pigment) and they could only invoke 'possibility of confusion', which won't work as this has a completely different context as the pokémon games (plus, they'd need an attorney, which they won't bother with, especially since they are wrong).

 Danyael
				Danyael
			



 
		
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		shakeycat wrote:You could cover the idea of pokemon really well, without ever saying the word.


 iancanton
				iancanton
			


















 
		 . I certainly must be able to find support under the "young of mind".
 . I certainly must be able to find support under the "young of mind".
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		

 iancanton
				iancanton
			


















 
		 Schwournes
				Schwournes
			









 
		

 matt-the-twat
				matt-the-twat
			




 
		 Map looks realy nice for big team matches
 Map looks realy nice for big team matches vilbrii
				vilbrii
			

 
		Schwournes wrote:It looks good, but I think the Sinnoh bonuses don't look logical, I think it should be west, east and maritimes (a band-shaped bonus around the top and east), personally.

 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		iceco wrote:Schwournes wrote:It looks good, but I think the Sinnoh bonuses don't look logical, I think it should be west, east and maritimes (a band-shaped bonus around the top and east), personally.
Yes, that division felt the worst to me too.
Though, I tried to subdivide it in four to get smaller bonuses. But in your idea, would you put Lake Savity and Snow Peak in the Maritime bonus or East?
 Schwournes
				Schwournes
			









 
		 
  
 

 sinctheassasin
				sinctheassasin
			

 
		 Schwournes
				Schwournes
			









 
		Schwournes wrote:I would put Snow Peak in the Maritime bonus, but the Lake either in Maritime or West; also, I would put Mt. Coronet in the East, because the bonus is smaller. I would also consider splitting the mountain into 2 - maybe north and south, with one being east and the other west
sinctheassasin wrote:once you fix the bonuses, it should be a really good map
but the thing i have to piss on your map for is still the copy right. you could change the names and everything, but the landmasses would still be copyrighted. they could pull up whatever game it came from, and show you that the land masses are exactly the same, and that's copyrighted.
to make it safe, you would have to pretty much change all of the land shapes, city names, references to poke anything, and once you do that, it really has nothing to do with pokemon...
Schwournes wrote:To be fair, Hoenn looks entirely different to how it normally would, there's a whole chunk missing
Maybe we need a more discreet version for those diehard pokémon fans who know the whole map by heart anyway

 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		
 
 

 sinctheassasin
				sinctheassasin
			

 
		iceco wrote:Schwournes wrote:I would put Snow Peak in the Maritime bonus, but the Lake either in Maritime or West; also, I would put Mt. Coronet in the East, because the bonus is smaller. I would also consider splitting the mountain into 2 - maybe north and south, with one being east and the other west
Splitting the mountain (figuratively) is a good idea, though I might do it North and South, as for technical reasons. One could also be higher, towards Snow Peak, as in the game, it's actually a mountain range.
I also thought of another possible division (with smaller continents), tell me what you think - if it's a no, I'll go with yours:
East (6): the three islands, Canal City, Eternal Forest and Eternal City
South (5): Lake Truth, Twintree Town, Friendship Park, Jubile and Oreville
Central (4): Mt. Corona, Harthome, Silicon Ruins and Pastory
West (7): Sunny Shore, Lake Volition, Veil Stone, 4th Gen, Mt. Bright, Sinnoh League and ParadisSchwournes wrote:To be fair, Hoenn looks entirely different to how it normally would, there's a whole chunk missing
Maybe we need a more discreet version for those diehard pokémon fans who know the whole map by heart anyway
I know, I made the decision to leave out everything called "Town", except for the starter towns and Lavender Town. I did this to reduce territories (otherwise about 105, which would have made the map too cluttered). If you really want, I'll add Fallarbor Town again, so northern Hoenn doesn't look too empty.
 Schwournes
				Schwournes
			









 
		
 iceco
				iceco
			


 
		
 The Yeti
				The Yeti
			


 
		Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users