Moderator: Cartographers
Was gonna say the same thing.Incandenza wrote:I liked the previous title better, seemed more authoritative somehow... the new one seems a bit too small-town chamber of commerce.
Sorry, Sully, i have to agree with Inca. the previous title was much more professional looking.Incandenza wrote:I liked the previous title better, seemed more authoritative somehow... the new one seems a bit too small-town chamber of commerce.

My guess is Any Old Business, or Any Other Business. Agenda-speak.sully800 wrote:MrBenn wrote:I'm not sure what AOB means.MrBenn wrote:6. AOB
I don't think there are any other matters arising![]()
AOB = Any other businessender516 wrote:I agree with everything the.killing.44 and Incandenza said. They are just faster at posting than I am.My guess is Any Old Business, or Any Other Business. Agenda-speak.sully800 wrote:MrBenn wrote:I'm not sure what AOB means.MrBenn wrote:6. AOB
I don't think there are any other matters arising![]()

The multi-fonts thing was so much better.SultanOfSurreal wrote:Really disappointed on the choice of font here... it's so gaudy
I prefer curved lines.Gustaf Wasa wrote:Lines that are not straight are more difficult for the eye to follow. It makes me more tired to get an overview of the latest version with the rounded lines here, than of the first version with the straight lines. So I would suggest that as far as possible, use straight lines!
Yeah, it wasn't my favorite initial choice either but very popular in the polls. I will switch to a more neutral font in the next version because I agree with your feelings.SultanOfSurreal wrote:Really disappointed on the choice of font here... it's so gaudy
I can see how curves would be slightly harder to follow, but in the end all you are doing is connecting 2 points with a line. There are no interruptions, so each curved line should eventually bring you to another clear point. The straight lines are shorter and possibly more clear but they don't look nearly as nice IMO. Also, some cities cannot be connected by straight lines so curves are a necessity, not just a choice.Gustaf Wasa wrote:Lines that are not straight are more difficult for the eye to follow. It makes me more tired to get an overview of the latest version with the rounded lines here, than of the first version with the straight lines. So I would suggest that as far as possible, use straight lines!
The last two images I posted were of a lower quality to reduce file size. I think that may be the cause of the blur you are seeing? I can switch to a slightly higher quality and post the highest quality for graphical checks if necessary.Tisha wrote:why did the land end up getting blurred?
Benn, what are your thoughts on the uniform font since you were encouraging it? I think the uniformity looks nicer and makes the map more coherent but it seems the camp is still split. It's funny that some people didn't even realize I was using multiple fonts, despite the mix of caps and lower case and different styles.thedon5 wrote:Am not a fan of the single font thing.
I have trouble with asymmetrical layouts, so I was trying to place the bottom two globes symmetrically.thedon5 wrote:I think the Western hemisphere globe needs to be moved closer to Oceania. It could overlap sea then, instead of the whole of Madagascar!
Isn't it Australasia now btw?
Yeah, the font is too wide to be used in a circle like that I think. Will change.thedon5 wrote:And shoot down this idea if you like, but how about using a smaller version of the eventual title font around the globes which show the bonuses? It is kind of boring seeing the same font across the whole bottom of the map. And it is also kind of confusing IMO, and looks a little busy.
thedon5 wrote:How about "By Sully800" under the title as well.
That would be pretty far south of the current bottom of the map. As you can see I am already cutting off the tip of South America, and I don't want to extend the map vertically because of scrolling issues. So I think I will avoid this change.thedon5 wrote:How about adding a little bit of white land at the bottom, to show Antartica?

No purposeful landmarks in the title, because I wouldn't be able to fit/find one from each city. It is meant to be a generic city skyline.cairnswk wrote:Sully, where's our Opera House in the title?![]()
Agreed.whitestazn88 wrote:i like the new title. very nice
