[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Can't say for sure but it definitely appears these two may be a multi or cheating via secret alliance
Game 23847
2006-05-22 19:50:19 - billybob: Wow!!!.....funny, Scorba and thegrimsleeper have been building their massive armies along borders with each other and yet are not attacking one another
2006-05-22 19:50:27 - billybob: ???
2006-05-22 19:52:02 - billybob: instead they seem hell bent on destorying me and yet as of now I pose no threat?
2006-05-22 19:52:38 - billybob: I don't see any mention of an alliance between the 2 anywhere?
2006-05-22 19:54:48 - billybob: instead they seem hell bent on destorying me and yet as of now I pose no threat?
You just ended up in a bad spot, guy. It sucks to be you, but that doesn't mean we've got an alliance-- you're just the penis in between us. Better luck next time.
EDIT-- Excuse me for being curt with you; I just don't like being accused of cheating.
Last edited by thegrimsleeper on Mon May 22, 2006 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
onbekende wrote:Looks fishy, but it is probably just to kick you out and sart some real fighting omun themselfs
that would be a secret alliance wouldn't it? I'm not saying they had one, I'm just saying don't let your bias' get in the way, even though you know they are well respected player. I'm Neutral.
Wow, Billy. Give yourself a chance to get the lay of the land here. You're what, like in your third or fourth game? I'm not saying you don't have the same rights as anyone else, but if you had been around a little longer you would realize how ludicris...lol it is to accuse established players such as these two.
You've also Got To have more evidence than this before you start accusing people. The mere fact that they have fortified their borders against each other is Strong evidence that they are worried about each other and do not have an alliance. A much more suspicious circumstance would be if they did not fortify their borders against each other.
As to my neutral friend, PP's assertion, even if each of the players had independently decided to eliminate the weakling on the board, this would not be a secret alliance unless they had communicated with each other about it, or at least had a history of working together in this way.
Finally, (aren't you glad), TheGrimSleeper is a member of xiGAMES. A group of Independent Risk Players who have all pledged to, and have a history of, Playing With Honor. It is specifically against the Code of Conduct of xiGAMES to form any Alliances of Any Kind, (secret or otherwise).
You're new here, so perhaps should be given some slack, but I assure you that you are lucky to find yourself in a game with two such fine players. Believe me, more often than not you will not have such good reputations to rely upon. The most precious thing we have here are our good reputations. Guard yours, and have respect for the good reputations of others.
Been playing Risk for a bit
Proud Member of xiGames, where Friends Kill Friends, with Honor
Scarus wrote:As to my neutral friend, PP's assertion, even if each of the players had independently decided to eliminate the weakling on the board, this would not be a secret alliance unless they had communicated with each other about it, or at least had a history of working together in this way.
That is true, good call! Yeah, they might have just wanted your cards Billy, that usually is more important that killing the person next to you, because I know I would rather eliminate someone, and then deploy with my new set
Scarus wrote:Wow, Billy. Give yourself a chance to get the lay of the land here. You're what, like in your third or fourth game? I'm not saying you don't have the same rights as anyone else, but if you had been around a little longer you would realize how ludicris...lol it is to accuse established players such as these two.
I dunno, I think it's kinda good that noobs accuse regulars, we can get to know people too well, and fail be an impartial observer anymore.
That said, the evidence here is pretty weak. Fairly obviously not deadbeats.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
What, I said what I meant... I mean you've taken all your turns, you're obviouly not a deadbeat. Oh and not a multi either.
Sorry my brain's fried, been trying to learn about incredulity towards metanarratives and legitimising knowledge, and other such fun postmodern concepts all day. Test tommorrow you see.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
qeee1 wrote:Sorry my brain's fried, been trying to learn about incredulity towards metanarratives and legitimising knowledge, and other such fun postmodern concepts all day. Test tommorrow you see.
Good God Boy, what are you studying, how to bore people in less than 10 seconds?
Wachicha's posts remind me of the guy walking around with the lunchboard signs over his head. He's just like a walking billboard......lol
A one line post and three links of advertising.....lol
Been playing Risk for a bit
Proud Member of xiGames, where Friends Kill Friends, with Honor
