Moderator: Community Team
targetman377 wrote:when lack made the site the lowest you can go lose is 1 no one can go below one.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:targetman377 wrote:when lack made the site the lowest you can go lose is 1 no one can go below one.
That's not 100% correct, originally it was, at least theoretically, possible to get a score of 0 or lower, but who could possibly be so bad that they would get a that low score? Everyone wins some time, right? Well, one player started getting close to 0, someone noticed, created a thread in GD, some people did the math and discovered that that one person could break... quite a lot of things. Division by 0, people losing points by winning against this person, this person winning more points than their opponents had.
So now you can't have less than a score of 1 and can't win/lose more than 100 points from/to any single player in a game.
medefe
Everyone wins some time, right?
MeDeFe wrote:targetman377 wrote:when lack made the site the lowest you can go lose is 1 no one can go below one.
That's not 100% correct, originally it was, at least theoretically, possible to get a score of 0 or lower, but who could possibly be so bad that they would get a that low score? Everyone wins some time, right? Well, one player started getting close to 0, someone noticed, created a thread in GD, some people did the math and discovered that that one person could break... quite a lot of things. Division by 0, people losing points by winning against this person, this person winning more points than their opponents had.
So now you can't have less than a score of 1 and can't win/lose more than 100 points from/to any single player in a game.
targetman377 wrote:MeDeFe wrote:targetman377 wrote:when lack made the site the lowest you can go lose is 1 no one can go below one.
That's not 100% correct, originally it was, at least theoretically, possible to get a score of 0 or lower, but who could possibly be so bad that they would get a that low score? Everyone wins some time, right? Well, one player started getting close to 0, someone noticed, created a thread in GD, some people did the math and discovered that that one person could break... quite a lot of things. Division by 0, people losing points by winning against this person, this person winning more points than their opponents had.
So now you can't have less than a score of 1 and can't win/lose more than 100 points from/to any single player in a game.
ohh thanks for the correction i thought it was always like that interesting thanks
MeDeFe wrote:targetman377 wrote:when lack made the site the lowest you can go lose is 1 no one can go below one.
That's not 100% correct, originally it was, at least theoretically, possible to get a score of 0 or lower, but who could possibly be so bad that they would get a that low score? Everyone wins some time, right? Well, one player started getting close to 0, someone noticed, created a thread in GD, some people did the math and discovered that that one person could break... quite a lot of things. Division by 0, people losing points by winning against this person, this person winning more points than their opponents had.
So now you can't have less than a score of 1 and can't win/lose more than 100 points from/to any single player in a game.
Seulessliathan wrote:if two players have 10 points, play 1v1, winner will get 9 points and loser goes down to 1? or does the winner get 20, but the loser loses only 9?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users