Moderator: Cartographers


1. There you go—the highest in the Foundry "ranks" called this a disaster as well. If you read the thread, there are dozens of respectable Foundry veterans who have called this thing a piece of shit, and within the Staff Room more and worse. People complain about "elitism," but it works the other way around: when new members come in and show up with shitty XML jobs, say it's "done," and meander along the way trying to disregard what has been raised multiple times, that is blatant ignorance.Orange-Idaho-Dog wrote:1. I'd sure like to hear someone else's opinion for once instead of just yours. You've shared your opinion, and as you said you wouldn't re-visit, so please don't let the door hit you on your way out of this thread. *Wait's for your reply*
2. Your mistake was one of many that already existed on the map.
3. The xml is complete, and has been OK'ed by Forza AZ, therefor my part is done. (Other than co-ordinates which will be fixed once I get a decent map)
4. Your versions of the map suck. No one ever asked you to make them.
To dolomite13, I'll see what I can do.

How exactly has it been a 'disaster' from the start? As I recall, it has all of its stamp's and is waiting on the final army circle's and a few small things to be fixed.MrBenn wrote:This map has been a disaster from the start. There has been no consistency of management/oversight, to the point where nobody has ownership of it, and there doesn't appear to be a usable working file to enable quick and easy edits.
The issues that are being raised again now (such as the army centering) were raised a long time ago, before a lengthy stint in the recycling bin.








I take issue with this, and consider it an insult to people like Lone Prophet, oaktown, the.killing.44 and even sailorseal that there is no mention of their names on the map. It is one thing to put some work into a map in order to help push it over the finishing line; something else to claim responsibility for the whole journey.dolomite13 wrote:Would these be the correct credits?
Created by Unit_2
XML by Orange-Idaho-Dog
Cartography by Dolomite13

Little did he know…oaktown on June 9th, 2009, 12:44 am wrote:geez, at this point so many people have worked on this map I think we should just call it a group project and slap a generic "Foundry" sig on it!![]()
I simply asked if it was correct. Instead of being an ass about it why don't you try helping by creating a correct list of credits.MrBenn wrote:I take issue with this, and consider it an insult to people like Lone Prophet, oaktown, the.killing.44 and even sailorseal that there is no mention of their names on the map. It is one thing to put some work into a map in order to help push it over the finishing line; something else to claim responsibility for the whole journey.dolomite13 wrote:Would these be the correct credits?
Created by Unit_2
XML by Orange-Idaho-Dog
Cartography by Dolomite13
The other thing to consider is that there is a maximum limit of two medals per map. While the map looks good, I think it would be difficult for any of you to claim ownership of the project. At this moment in time, I would argue that the three names you listed are not the three people who have invested the most effort into getting the map thus far.
I see names in his post. Do you not? Instead of taking it personally, why don't you try reading more carefully.dolomite13 wrote:I simply asked if it was correct. Instead of being an ass about it why don't you try helping by creating a correct list of credits.MrBenn wrote:I take issue with this, and consider it an insult to people like Lone Prophet, oaktown, the.killing.44 and even sailorseal that there is no mention of their names on the map. It is one thing to put some work into a map in order to help push it over the finishing line; something else to claim responsibility for the whole journey.dolomite13 wrote:Would these be the correct credits?
Created by Unit_2
XML by Orange-Idaho-Dog
Cartography by Dolomite13
The other thing to consider is that there is a maximum limit of two medals per map. While the map looks good, I think it would be difficult for any of you to claim ownership of the project. At this moment in time, I would argue that the three names you listed are not the three people who have invested the most effort into getting the map thus far.
=D=
Sounds good ... I toned it down a bit...the.killing.44 wrote:Title - too blaring. Tone down the colors, opacity, and blending mode.
Agreed... how does this look?the.killing.44 wrote:Water - too uniform. I think you used a pattern overlay—try smudging all around (what I did on Greenland, though you can tone down the strength)
Okie dokie hows this look?the.killing.44 wrote:Font - too "bleh," also too bright and big. Go back to a serif font, lower the size by 2pt, and make the color more of a gray. The same goes for the legend font.
Donethe.killing.44 wrote:Legend - like I said, change the font. also, add a hyphen or colon between the names and numbers, and make the glow to the outside much less sharp.
Going to need help with that as American English is my only language. But I changed that accent... let me know if I missed any please.the.killing.44 wrote:Also, get the accents right. Lanaudiére should be Lanaudière, etc. Looks good though.
the.killing.44 wrote:I see names in his post. Do you not? Instead of taking it personally, why don't you try reading more carefully?

