But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
Reagan VS. Clinton
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
AlgyTaylor
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Neither.
But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
-
Phatscotty
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Yes, the spawn of satan, cuz we all know, Reagan had a hard time keeping it in his pants.....ya know!AlgyTaylor wrote:Neither.
But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
If adultery makes you the spawn of Satan, we're absolutely fucked. And have been for possibly 90,000 years. Which brings your entire thesis into question.Phatscotty wrote:Yes, the spawn of satan, cuz we all know, Reagan had a hard time keeping it in his pants.....ya know!AlgyTaylor wrote:Neither.
But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Yer, cus its not like any Republicans have been having their bit on the side...Phatscotty wrote:Yes, the spawn of satan, cuz we all know, Reagan had a hard time keeping it in his pants.....ya know!AlgyTaylor wrote:Neither.
But I'd go for Clinton I guess ... cos, ya know ... he's not the spawn of satan.
And since when did getting a blojob make you the spawn of satan? I thought supporting dictatorships was much more evil then one of lifes great pleasures.
-
thegreekdog
- Posts: 7246
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
-
thegreekdog
- Posts: 7246
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
What hypocrisy? I mean, I certainly hope people don't think Reagan is better because he didn't get a BJ from an ugly intern. If that is their reason, I'll join in the mocking of them.Titanic wrote:Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Which hypocricy would that be?Titanic wrote:Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
The hypocrisy of idealising him and criticising others when a lot of his policies were not too different.Woodruff wrote:Which hypocricy would that be?Titanic wrote:Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
You mean like how you criticized him for supporting dictatorships while overlooking the fact that almost every President we've had in the modern era has done the same?Titanic wrote:The hypocrisy of idealising him and criticising others when a lot of his policies were not too different.Woodruff wrote:Which hypocricy would that be?Titanic wrote:Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
To be fair, you don't find me (or Titanic) defending a whole lot of American presidents. Sure, there's that one, but saying he's not a Communist (I wish!) is a weak compliment, if it even is one. Carter gets a bad rap. I'd probably stick Reagan on my list of least favorite Presidents, but it's kind of a long list.Woodruff wrote:You mean like how you criticized him for supporting dictatorships while overlooking the fact that almost every President we've had in the modern era has done the same?Titanic wrote:The hypocrisy of idealising him and criticising others when a lot of his policies were not too different.Woodruff wrote:Which hypocricy would that be?Titanic wrote:Not saying he didn't, I just hate the hypocrisy of the Reagan worshippers.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, good thing President Clinton supported no dictatorships.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Re: Reagan VS. Clinton
Exactly, our opinions of the presidents are fairly equal/logical (especially when the policies are the same). There are a lot of people who are too partisan or not critical enough for some of them.spurgistan wrote: To be fair, you don't find me (or Titanic) defending a whole lot of American presidents. Sure, there's that one, but saying he's not a Communist (I wish!) is a weak compliment, if it even is one. Carter gets a bad rap. I'd probably stick Reagan on my list of least favorite Presidents, but it's kind of a long list.