Moderator: Cartographers



Then the map name ought to be changed (e.g. like what was done with the China-map), don't think there are any reasons to imply anything not true in the map/map name etc. or change the name to "The Falkland Islands (the U.K.)".skeletonboy wrote:I know that it isnt part of Argentina, and thats why it has no bonus. It also relieves the bottle neck in Patagonia. I have thought quite a lot about it, and I think that it adds to the map instead of detracting from it.alstergren wrote:Indeed. The Falklands is not part of Argentina and should thus not be in a map named "Argentina". I don't see why CC maps should be used to make a political point, touvh upon border dispute issues etc. Doing that, well, it would just go downhill from there. Factual correct is just the way to go I think.Industrial Helix wrote:The Falklands isn't recognized as part of Argentina. Perhaps it could have some special designation.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.

In addition to the unique area, something like this might help to differentiate the gameplay from other small maps?MrBenn wrote:I was just looking at the Argentine Tourist Board website, and I noticed that each region has it's own shield/coat of arms - could you incorporate them somehow? They might seem more suitable than the Brazil flag?
The tourist board region guides seemed to include some of the 'territories' within two regions... I wonder if you could do something similar here?? It would help differentiate the gameplay a little bit more?
